Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 64

Thread: Why Waste Time with Video Poker if Win Goals, Loss Limits and Martingale Progressions Work?

  1. #41
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Haha! Why in the world would I EVER! come out to your hillbilly slum!? So why wait??
    Yes, why would you when you much prefer hiding in the basement of your tenement shack watching child porn.

  2. #42
    mickey you seem to have a fascination with the word "ass" when you get into your tough guy talk. Could it be because you're living with your daddy? Should mommy be jealous??

  3. #43
    This is the best creative writing class I've ever attended.

  4. #44
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    This is the best creative writing class I've ever attended.
    I take it you've never read the soliloquies of Dan Druff's main nemesis on the PFA forums, then.

  5. #45
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    You might want to ask yourself why this LoneStar gambling genius has not yet learned that you never bet the ML against the Patriots.
    This is how dumb of a gambler Rob is. It depends on what the money line is. If you would have gotten an average of +310 against the Patriots this year in the regular season you would have showed a profit.

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    This is the best creative writing class I've ever attended.
    I was more a numbers guy than a creative writing guy. So help me here redietz---who is the protagonist in this story??

  7. #47
    Originally Posted by regnis View Post
    I was more a numbers guy than a creative writing guy. So help me here redietz---who is the protagonist in this story??
    Not sure about that, but when reading the posts this proverb comes to mind: The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

  8. #48
    Originally Posted by regnis View Post
    I was more a numbers guy than a creative writing guy. So help me here redietz---who is the protagonist in this story??
    I'm going to wing this without looking stuff up, but I seem to recall that a protagonist should be the person whose point of view commands the story or the character with which we are supposed to identify.

    Rob's point of view doesn't really command the storyline here, but there is a certain pathos that draws the reader in with Rob. Kind of like Frankenstein's monster. You feel for him, even though he's strangling the villagers. And when a blind guy takes him in (no Alan, I'm not referencing you -- it's actually in the story), the monster gets along swell. Until he throws the little girl in the lake, although that may have been an analogy for the times that 57K goes down the Martingale River.

    Rob probably sees himself more as a latter day Dexter. I only saw that show a couple of times, but I got the drift. A serial killer who kills serial killers. Kind of like somebody who uses 95% AP strategies, but goes around killing AP's because they're evil.

    I expect a Pulitzer to go with my MacArthur for what I just wrote, by the way.
    Last edited by redietz; 01-23-2016 at 10:59 PM.

  9. #49
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    This is the best creative writing class I've ever attended.
    There is nothing more fun that a "who's got the biggest dick" fight on the internet. I can't wait to see the next installment of threats and chest thumping.

  10. #50
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I'm going to wing this without looking stuff up, but I seem to recall that a protagonist should be the person whose point of view commands the story or the character with which we are supposed to identify.

    Rob's point of view doesn't really command the storyline here, but there is a certain pathos that draws the reader in with Rob. Kind of like Frankenstein's monster. You feel for him, even though he's strangling the villagers. And when a blind guy takes him in (no Alan, I'm not referencing you -- it's actually in the story), the monster gets along swell. Until he throws the little girl in the lake, although that may have been an analogy for the times that 57K goes down the Martingale River.

    Rob probably sees himself more as a latter day Dexter. I only saw that show a couple of times, but I got the drift. A serial killer who kills serial killers. Kind of like somebody who uses 95% AP strategies, but goes around killing AP's because they're evil.

    I expect a Pulitzer to go with my MacArthur for what I just wrote, by the way.


    I don't care who you are. That's funny right there!

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by james40 View Post
    There is nothing more fun that a "who's got the biggest dick" fight on the internet.
    Mine ain't no bigger around than a beer can....but it's long and lean.

  12. #52
    I think it's beneficial to discuss the anatomy of winning plays, the anatomy of a winning strategy, and the anatomy of a casino winner. But that should exclude the actual human anatomy. Thank you.

  13. #53
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think it's beneficial to discuss the anatomy of winning plays, the anatomy of a winning strategy, and the anatomy of a casino winner. But that should exclude the actual human anatomy. Thank you.
    No,. Thank you!
    Take off that stupid mask you big baby.

  14. #54
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think it's beneficial to discuss the anatomy of winning plays, the anatomy of a winning strategy, and the anatomy of a casino winner. But that should exclude the actual human anatomy. Thank you.
    This just got funny.

  15. #55
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think it's beneficial to discuss the anatomy of winning plays, the anatomy of a winning strategy, and the anatomy of a casino winner. But that should exclude the actual human anatomy. Thank you.
    But how will we know who the "bigger" man is?

  16. #56
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    It IS fun, isn't it.

    You might want to ask yourself why this LoneStar gambling genius has not yet learned that you never bet the ML against the Patriots.
    What do you have to say about not betting against the Patriots on the money line now, boob?

  17. #57
    They didn't cheat enough.

  18. #58
    No way they're cheating themselves to a win this time around. (I'm not saying they've ever cheated though)
    Take off that stupid mask you big baby.

  19. #59
    Somebody has them at 14-1 to win the thing.

    What was interesting was that, while the Patriots drew spread money the last 24 hours, moneyline money came in on the Broncos at the end.

  20. #60
    Originally Posted by slobdinger View Post
    What do you have to say about not betting against the Patriots on the money line now, boob?
    You're contradicting yourself again. First it's a "long-term" thing then it's not. I guess the bottom of the bottle didn't have the right message.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •