Why would I try Rob's strategies? What I'm doing already works and I make more money than I would playing Rob's strategies (with significantly-less/no risk). And there is absolutely nothing that backs up Rob's system. I mean, Rob hasn't even showed a single finding he has had when he came up with his strategy, and I suspect we will never get that information. Based on Rob's research (NOT HIS "RESULTS"), what is his average win, loss, and frequency of each? There's nothing to back this data up.
I know if I go to a casino and play X amount on Y machine and get Z back in FP/cash/etc., I can determine what my EV is, how frequently I'll end up a winner/loser and by how much.
I know if I put in X hours of BJ (card counting) how much I'm expected to make on average, how much I can lose and how much I can win and the probability of each.
I can do these things because it can be figured out using simple math or simulation. When looking at my results, they line up with the theoretical results (both in expected result ~= actual result, and frequency of wins/losses based on math line up with the theoretical figures).
It's obvious Rob has never done the proper research and figured out this kind of information for his system. Without doing that, you can't know if it's a winning strategy or not.