Originally Posted by
redietz
I think closing this book would be splendid; it's a complete waste of time, other than the whole paranormal claim angle. Unfortunately, Rob keeps inserting references in this thread and that regarding his alleged history and systems. So anybody sitting down and reading Dan's forum for the first time is going to be exposed to Rob's suggestions that his is the way to win. If Rob just laid out his alleged personal history as evidence for his claims, fine. That would be like a brokerage service advertising last quarter's results. Rob, however, never adds "past results are no guarantee of similar future success." He doesn't claim to have won for a stretch in time; he claims to have solved negative video poker.
As a respected journalist, you should be on board with pointing this out at every opportunity.