Rob Singer has taken his act on the road again.

[Alan Mendelson]

Bill this quote you posted above is ridiculous. The way I read it, this guy LarryS is criticizing Rob for making overnight trips to Vegas? And from what Rob told us he made one trip a week? And this guy Larry thinks Rob would have been better off living in Vegas instead of living in Phoenix?

I'm sure Rob would like to comment on this himself but it seems to me that Rob didn't want to live in Vegas -- period. And he drove to Vegas for one overnight trip a week. My understanding is Rob didn't go to Vegas for extended stays and he talks about how he would sometimes go there, hit his win goal and then leave without even staying the night in the hotel.

To me this LarryS criticism is just another reach -- trying to find something to criticize Rob about.

In regards to those who Rob trained or said he trained: I have no idea how many there were. But I am going to guess that very few if any had Rob's budget and therefore had to change from Rob's model play. Even if Rob sat with me and taught me his method, I couldn't play his model because I don't have a $57,000 budget. Even after I hit that $100K royal I didn't have a $57,000 budget (because I paid taxes, ex wife, lawyers).

[slingshot]

Bill this quote you posted above is ridiculous. The way I read it, this guy LarryS is criticizing Rob for making overnight trips to Vegas? And from what Rob told us he made one trip a week? And this guy Larry thinks Rob would have been better off living in Vegas instead of living in Phoenix?

I'm sure Rob would like to comment on this himself but it seems to me that Rob didn't want to live in Vegas -- period. And he drove to Vegas for one overnight trip a week. My understanding is Rob didn't go to Vegas for extended stays and he talks about how he would sometimes go there, hit his win goal and then leave without even staying the night in the hotel.

To me this LarryS criticism is just another reach -- trying to find something to criticize Rob about.

In regards to those who Rob trained or said he trained: I have no idea how many there were. But I am going to guess that very few if any had Rob's budget and therefore had to change from Rob's model play. Even if Rob sat with me and taught me his method, I couldn't play his model because I don't have a $57,000 budget. Even after I hit that $100K royal I didn't have a $57,000 budget (because I paid taxes, ex wife, lawyers).

Starting at 50c, you only need $3,500 to go to $5 level on his most popular artt strategy for one session. I know the 50c level is a hangup, but you don't stay there.

[Bill Yung]

Even if Rob sat with me and taught me his method, I couldn't play his model because I don't have a $57,000 budget. Even after I hit that $100K royal I didn't have a $57,000 budget (because I paid taxes, ex wife, lawyers).

You and Singer just have to iron out a craps system for the masses. An undeniable combination?

Somehow, I bet book to follow - about the system in the making - would be another huge success.

[Alan Mendelson]

There is no craps system. Just hope the dice show the numbers you bet.

[Bill Yung]

There is no craps system. Just hope the dice show the numbers you bet.

Looking (beyond pure system play) sure beats the hell out of arsing around with the stunts the AP's "think" they're pulling. I thought I had seen just about everything out of those smarty pants over the years, until the Wuz banned four of them last week for flagging to erase a post which might have been of only questionable marginal value to the public. How far off the radar does one have to become to worry about, nay, insidiously plot to prevent a meaninglessly few harmless people on an over-the-hill gambling forum - fewer still in Vegas - from availing also themselves of a bit casino offer? OMG!

Shackleford was angry because he, like the casinos, needs the "ploppies" (I call 'em AP's "ploopies" over there, idiots with two o's instead of one.) I guess that makes RS__, for one there, a real turd scumbag revealed. A real rodent.

[RS__]

Shackleford was angry because he, like the casinos, needs the "ploppies" (I call 'em AP's "ploopies" over there, idiots with two o's instead of one.) I guess that makes RS__, for one there, a real turd scumbag revealed. A real rodent.

How am I a "real turd scumbag" or a "real rodent"?

[Rob.Singer]

Of course not, Arc. The expected return is based on the pay table. Anything else you are doing simply guesses at what Rob might do and what might happen as Rob plays.

I am 1000% positive that Rob will NEVER claim he has a better ER than what the paytable says the ER is. I am 1000% positive that Rob only looks at one thing: how much cash he has when he leaves.

What you seem to be missing is that sometimes the math does not apply to the result. DI does not change the odds in craps. And Rob's method does not change the ER in video poker.

Of course you're right Alan, and arci's only claiming these things because his agenda is one that's based on lies concerning everything about me. That's why he's been made to suffer so much in life--karma.

My strategy focuses on one single point: to give good luck (ie, a large, potentially session-ending winning hand) more opportunity to show up. And that's done by increasing denomination, increasing game volatility, playing games like SDBP that pay a whopping 600 credits for quad face cards, 400 for 2's thru 4's, 800 for Aces, and either 300 or 400 for the SF. It DOES NOT claim to advance the ER of the game prior to playing it, in fact, it claims to do the exact opposite if anyone remembers watching the videos Alan put up. It DOES increase the ACTUAL RETURN vs. the ER of the game, and significantly so.

No one has all the info needed to do a factual, accurate simulation of SPS. Whatever arci claims on this is a result of his only trying to look good here. And the wizard has the same problem--he never wanted to sit with me and understand it fully enough to be able to do a credible sim. If he's claiming he couldn't run one because I told him the machines aren't random, that's a lie also. I've told him face-to-face and said the same things the past 10 years--that although I may not believe that every machine is 100% random 100% of the time, everything about my strategy, approach & play assumes that they are. If he's saying that now then he's only trying to appease the collection of theory-driven armchair gamblers over there who have nothing nice to say about anybody unlike them.

Wise up guys....and stop making things up.

[redietz]

Karma is undoubtedly why Rob has won all of these years. It's undeniable.

[Bill Yung]

ro·dent

noun
plural noun: rodents

A gnawing mammal of an order that includes rats, mice, squirrels, hamsters, porcupines, and their relatives, distinguished by strong constantly growing incisors and no canine teeth. They constitute the largest order of mammals.

[Bill Yung]

Karma is undoubtedly why Rob has won all of these years. It's undeniable.

As far as these testimonials--I keep in touch with over a hundred people I trained. Through the years a number of them have come on different forums to explain their experiences, yet they ALWAYS get insulted/chased away by the envious and the haters. A favorite tactic is to claim they're me in alias form. So you can see why they choose to stay away from this stuff. I was prepared for all the BS from the start. Most of these people aren't. Understand that for almost 8 years, I put the weekly hurt on all the self-proclaimed vp "AP's" with my column in Gaming Today, and they will never get over it. So they attack anywhere they can to scratch that unattainable itch they have over me.

About the distance from the job: it wouldn't have been unusual to sell a house in one place and move close to where the work was. However, it was never really on the table because my wife had over 30 years with the aerospace co. she worked at, and it would not have made sense to mess up her continued employment, pension and other retirement benefits for what I was doing. And remember, living apart during the week or whatever was not an option, since us being together more often was one of the main reasons I changed careers in the first place.

[coach belly]

I wonder how many times Rob did win exactly $2,500? I'm going to guess he probably never did.

I agree...my point exactly...

Arc has cleared me to post the results from the four years of transcripts:

2012
won 4,000

2013
won 4,000

[Rob.Singer]

Quote Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
I wonder how many times Rob did win exactly $2,500? I'm going to guess he probably never did.

That is correct. It would also be correct to say that I have never won $2501, $2503, $2504, $2505, $2506 in any of my sessions. I believe I did win $2502 once and $2510 once. All the other wins were greater and/or much greater than $2500.

Those numbers arci claimed on his transcripts--you can tell when you go back thru his posts in those years that he's lying. Guess he didn't expect the scrutiny. After all, EVERYBODY wins an exact round amount.

I wonder if he's learned his lesson.....

[coach belly]

Those numbers arci claimed on his transcripts--you can tell when you go back thru his posts in those years that he's lying.

Pathological liars always think everybody else is lying...because lies are their frame of reference.

Acrid is a pathological liar.

I had him pegged from my day one...when he called me a liar...that was a red flag.

I was right about him, just like I was right about the donkey...and about the donkey's liitle ditz bird.

Wise up.

[arcimede$]

I see our two resident liars are projecting their own tendencies. Notice how they still can't point to a single lie I've ever made. All they can do is cry in their misery while refusing to place a mere $300 at risk to see my 2010 and 2015 results. LOL.

[Alan Mendelson]

I think it's very unusual that the reported wins on a tax return only include the W2G wins. That is not proper reporting.

[arcimede$]

I think it's very unusual that the reported wins on a tax return only include the W2G wins. That is not proper reporting.

Since I've already explained this before, I can only wonder why you bring it up again. The actual win is the difference between the W2G and the losses. I can only shake my head that you would repeat this nonsense.

[Alan Mendelson]

Since I've already explained this before, I can only wonder why you bring it up again. The actual win is the difference between the W2G and the losses. I can only shake my head that you would repeat this nonsense.

It's not nonsense. It's actually a violation of the IRS rules and procedures. What you are telling us via your tax returns is that you never had a winning day without a royal flush. Therefore you underreported your daily wins, which underreported your adjusted gross income, which altered your actual tax liability.

When I report my gaming results, I include net wins for each day even if I am a net loser for the year. Yes, my net wins do increase my adjusted gross income and that in turns lowers the value of my Schedule A deductions. But that's the way it is and that's what the rules say to do. Yes, I am penalized on my taxes even though I am a net loser.

[coach belly]

What you are telling us via your tax returns is that you never had a winning day without a royal flush.

acrid outed himself with those tax transcripts.

If he is willing to lie to the IRS under penalty of law,
then everything he has posted anonymously on the internet over the years is all bullshit.

He is a total fraud, a pathological liar, and an asshole to boot.

[Alan Mendelson]

I held back posting what I did about his tax returns. But he called Singer a liar one too many times.

[coach belly]

I held back posting what I did about his tax returns. But he called Singer a liar one too many times.

Yes you were much more diplomatic back in the day.