Originally Posted by
Alan Mendelson
Originally Posted by
arcimede$
As usual when Alan is made to look foolish he tries to change the subject. You supported Regnis statement so please explain to everyone how the peeker could know "at least one die is a 2" when he doesn't see both of the die.
Are you fucking insane? He only has to see ONE die to make the statement "at least one die is a two." You don't have to see both dice. And in the question it is stated that the "peeker" truthfully says one die is a 2.
So what the fuck is your problem?
Once again, of course one die has to be a 2 in order to make the statement "at least one die is a 2."
Arc is again trying to twist words. We went through this before.
This is Arc's routine. Ive seen it for years through his battles with Singer.
Well, the problem is if the peeker looks at the first die and it is a 1,3,4,5, or 6, which most of the time it will be one of those numbers, he has to look at the other die to see if it is a 2. Duh!