Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 51

Thread: Why is Rob allowed to post here?

  1. #21
    Trying something that won't work is ignorant and stupid.

    Btw, an easy way to breathe underwater without using a scuba tank, snorkel, etc. is to close your eyes and count backwards from 100. Don't go using some theoretical mumbo jumbo saying you'd drown/die, just try it for yourself.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Trying something that won't work is ignorant and stupid.

    Btw, an easy way to breathe underwater without using a scuba tank, snorkel, etc. is to close your eyes and count backwards from 100. Don't go using some theoretical mumbo jumbo saying you'd drown/die, just try it for yourself.
    Oh- I forgot one! You just reminded me. Twisted logic.

  3. #23
    Rob had his "students" use his card in the machine. That's the bottom line. That's what his "system" is based on.
    Take off that stupid mask you big baby.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    I'm still wondering why Rob Stringer is allowed to post here...
    You and me both RS.
    You both advocate censoring Singer, but offer no opinion on Biloxi Bill?

    That's some serious AP BS right there.

  5. #25
    Let me correct one point. Rob filed bankruptcy as a conventional video poker. He says when he switched to his system he won the million dollars.

    Regarding why I never learned Rob's system: I didn't avail mylf of the opportunity. I still don't understand it and I would have to sit with him to learn it.

    My videos with him were just about special plays. Frankly I reject most of them but not all.

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    I'm still wondering why Rob Stringer is allowed to post here...
    You and me both RS.
    You both advocate censoring Singer, but offer no opinion on Biloxi Bill?

    That's some serious AP BS right there.
    Maybe because I don`t screw with anyone here or get too involved with threads unless you or your jackoff idol are in there acting like total dickwads to people...

    You and Singer are mental midgets and intellectual dwarfs compared to someone with a high IQ like myself....cutting both of you to bits requires very little effort on my part...

    both of you know this, and why you both don`t engage me...that and the obvious fact you`re both internet pussies

    I told you a few things when I first joined here a year and a half ago, and you accused me of being someone else after my first post...One, I told

    you I was in the jackoff extermination business...you and your hero are obvious candidates....and two, after you were so rude to me and tried to punk me out, I told you i would be your worst nightmare on this board, and I believe in being a man of my word

    I`ve seen you for a year and a half try and come on here like a wise ass trying to punk various people out .....that won`t and never did fly with me boy, so run along back to the boys locker room and stay there

  7. #27
    I don't mind if Rob gets in the mud and argues with the various people here. There's plenty of fighting on this forum without Rob. It won't be peaceful a this place even if I ban Rob.

    However, Rob does tend to derail threads with pointless trolling, and that's what I want to see stopped.

    I might just try banning him from specific threads if he shows up and causes them to get derailed.
    Check out my poker forum, and weekly internet radio show at http://pokerfraudalert.com

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    The way I remember it.
    1. There was a period of time when his strategy was discussed-and the posts are on this forum.
    2. Then there was a period where "math" and derogatory remarks were used to downplay and "disprove" the strategy.
    3. Now when the tables turn, no one wants to hear what they once were guilty of- filthy, stupid, senseless remarks.
    Sling, you need a double shot of a good dose of reality. Singer's bs has been going on in the forums for 15 years. Go read the early days of FREEvpFREE or LVA Sports or WoV where Rob is involved. Countless individuals have tried to debate with Rob over the merit's of Rob's tactics at video poker. It starts along the lines of "Mr. Singer, I disagree with your tactics at video poker and here is why...." and Rob's response is along the lines of "You filthy disgusting addicted gambler...."

    Rob has made countless attacks on Bob Dancer and Jean Scott over the years calling them filthy disgusting addicted gamblers. But have you ever read anything from them attacking him. No, you haven't. A prime example is kewlj, a new member here. Without provocation Rob made a gratuitous blistering attack on him.

    Sling, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee. You need to start dealing with reality. Singer's system should of made you rich by now if it really works. Instead of doing it once a week like Rob said he did you could do it once a day, twice a day, and in short order you should have parlayed up to the 1/2/5/10/25/100 level that Rob said he played at. And then hit the big time. But you haven't done that have you?

    Sling, do you have any bankroll at all? What did you say Singer has done for you?

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    both of you know this, and why you both don`t engage me
    Stop...I already buried you back when you used to call yourself LoneStarHorse.

    90% of your posts are one-liners that show you are mentally ill, if anyone is on the chopping block around here it's gotta be sicko Biloxi Bill.

    Once Dan started talking about banning people, then all of the sudden you start posting more than one stupid sentence at a time...so now you post multiple stupid sentences at a time.

    You are your parents' worst nightmare boy, not mine.

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    both of you know this, and why you both don`t engage me
    Stop...I already buried you back when you used to call yourself LoneStarHorse.

    90% of your posts are one-liners that show you are mentally ill, if anyone is on the chopping block around here it's gotta be sicko Biloxi Bill.

    Once Dan started talking about banning people, then all of the sudden you start posting more than one stupid sentence at a time...so now you post multiple stupid sentences at a time.

    You are your parents' worst nightmare boy, not mine.
    You didn`t burn anything but your tongue on Rob`s ass, you miserable puke....I doubt anyone has ever seen a man crush like you have on Singer....pathetic, and kinda creepy at the same time....like I said, it`s clear you are a little keyboard pussy who latched on to another man to validate himself.....get back to that peephole that connects from your janitors closet to the football teams shower......boy

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    I'm still wondering why Rob Stringer is allowed to post here...
    You and me both RS. I get that some people want a forum where people are free to post whatever is on there mind, free of censorship. In theory, that is great. But there is a difference in people having differing opinions (good), and someone who's only intention is to be disruptive and as nasty as they can possible be (bad), Allowing these types of troll and there is no other word for these bitter old men, only diminishes any site and discourages growth and new members. Every site seems to have a couple of these bitter old guys lately.

    It confuses me as to what this site is supposed to be? Dan Druff seems like a reasonable guy. He explained the history of the site, that it started as Alan's site related to his infomercial business, but most of the conversation turned to gambling topics. I guess Alan had an anything goes policy. But when Someone else takes over and renames the site "Vegas Casino Talk", it would seem like the intent was to turn the page and have a legitimate site about gambling and AP topics. But that doesn't seem to be the intent. There doesn't seem to be any turning the page or interest in growth. Just a few bitter old trolls doing their thing....being nasty and disruptive and discouraging any kind of possible growth and/or new members.
    waaa....waaa....sniffle sniffle Poor twinkle toes is beside himself.

    What you might ponder over more than your obsession with me, is why you just had to come here and spew your lies about being some phony bj (and I mean Blackjack--not what you're disgustingly really into) "pro" and having the ability to simultaneously count tables next to you that you can't even see the cards on.

    Wise up.

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by quahaug View Post
    The problem is there is no context to Robs insulting posts. Since no one is really engaging him on his level it's taken the wind out of his sails. If you go back a ways he was entertaining in a way when Arci and him were going back and forth for instance. The last thing I chuckled at was Micky's drunken responses to him but Micky's now on the wagon (good for you) so that's the end of that.I think he's finally run his course.
    Mickey's on the wagon? Was it his latest DUI that triggered it??

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by bocce ball View Post



    Alan is correct.

    I don't see anything ban-worthy about Rob's behavior. His post volume is frequent but not excessive. Usually he makes his points concisely. His personal insults are sometimes amusing, and always harmless.

    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Rather than an outright ban how about just deleting the bs?
    Or move to a containment thread if it's considered intolerable in the place where it was posted. But it's not desirable to completely eliminate the BS. Perhaps a warning could be added, advising people not to wear their good shoes inside the forum.

    Bocce, really, if you were posting under your real name and Rob said your gambling addiction had ruined your marriages (without data or examples or evidence), or that you were guilty of identity theft and/or you were a drug addict, would you consider that "harmless?"
    Red, absolute evidence or a court verdict is not needed when it comes to internet discussions--esp. about social problems as it relates to gambling. Ever hear of the saying "if it quacks like a duck then it's a duck"? We'll, when someone who's a very nice person and has a decent job, and at the same time spends what amounts to an inordinate amount of time gambling and discussing gaming--and has one failed marriage after another after another after another--then you need not consult an encyclopedia, a group of mensas, or some know-it-all library university professor, to understand where the problem truly lies.

    A good education would have taught you that.

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    Just wondering why math and disprove are in quotation marks, as opposed, say, to "strategy."
    Simple. No one tried any of the strategies or met with Rob to actually post results but instead used theoretical formulas and percentages that "proved" their rebuttal. And dollar amounts are no excuse as they can be tried at any denomination(s). Even Alan, who sometimes watched his play never sat for a learning session.
    Actually, it doesn't matter anymore as I grew weary of checking in so often and left feeling I was in a prison of homos, drunks, and murderers. To wit, my respect for Arci grew because of his silence and restraint.
    He went bankrupt...that`s all anyone needs to know
    Very good Bill--in 1996....when I was an AP.

    So how's that fit into your silly narrative....

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Trying something that won't work is ignorant and stupid.

    Btw, an easy way to breathe underwater without using a scuba tank, snorkel, etc. is to close your eyes and count backwards from 100. Don't go using some theoretical mumbo jumbo saying you'd drown/die, just try it for yourself.
    Explain how you "know it won't work". It works for me--far beyond whatever you say works for you.

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    both of you know this, and why you both don`t engage me
    Stop...I already buried you back when you used to call yourself LoneStarHorse.

    90% of your posts are one-liners that show you are mentally ill, if anyone is on the chopping block around here it's gotta be sicko Biloxi Bill.

    Once Dan started talking about banning people, then all of the sudden you start posting more than one stupid sentence at a time...so now you post multiple stupid sentences at a time.

    You are your parents' worst nightmare boy, not mine.
    You didn`t burn anything but your tongue on Rob`s ass, you miserable puke....I doubt anyone has ever seen a man crush like you have on Singer....pathetic, and kinda creepy at the same time....like I said, it`s clear you are a little keyboard pussy who latched on to another man to validate himself.....get back to that peephole that connects from your janitors closet to the football teams shower......boy
    Lonestarhorse is forever agitated over how I took him out to the woodshed multiple times exposing his silly claims, and then how he cowardly would not meet me inside the HRH garage. It doesn't take much to understand why he dances around as bill, trying very unsuccessfully to bother me. I simply laugh at him after pointing out what a failure he's been.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 09-01-2017 at 03:31 PM.

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Sling, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee. You need to start dealing with reality. Singer's system should of made you rich by now if it really works. Instead of doing it once a week like Rob said he did you could do it once a day, twice a day, and in short order you should have parlayed up to the 1/2/5/10/25/100 level that Rob said he played at. And then hit the big time. But you haven't done that have you?

    Sling, do you have any bankroll at all? What did you say Singer has done for you?
    Mickey, the silence from these two fools (Slingshot and Shit Slinger) speaks volumes!

    THEY'RE BOTH 100% FULL OF SHIT LIARS!!!!!!!!!

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I have been considering what to do about this.

    Originally I wanted to run the forum mostly in the "spirit" of the original Alanbestbuys forum, and that included allowing Rob to continue to exist here.

    But if he's just going to ruin every thread with pointless trolling, I might have to revisit that.
    Where else you gonna get a thread like this, and where else you gonna get somebody who doesn't accept everyone else's fantasy version of casino knowledge and gambling....

    The problem with these WoW strays and even redietz is they came here or became obnoxious out of total frustration with Alan's rightful conclusion about the dice question, and their first order of business as always been to argue with Alan over the most stupid of issues. Ever hear of someone who claims to be a winning AP but can't tell anything about it? Ever hear someone say they'd accept a challenge (from coach) then claim to be busy in his hometown FOR THE ENTIRE WEEK OF THE VISIT? And ever heard someone try to make others believe he can count two tables simultaneously and accurately (which is the only way it's worth being done) as if he were trying to persuade a kindergarten class?

    Alan shouldn't have to put these fools in their place all by himself. So if you cave into pressure from these clowns then I'll certainly try to keep busy elsewise

    I'm still trying to process mickey not drinking any longer. Is there an over/under on that?

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    The way I remember it.
    1. There was a period of time when his strategy was discussed-and the posts are on this forum.
    2. Then there was a period where "math" and derogatory remarks were used to downplay and "disprove" the strategy.
    3. Now when the tables turn, no one wants to hear what they once were guilty of- filthy, stupid, senseless remarks.
    Sling, you need a double shot of a good dose of reality. Singer's bs has been going on in the forums for 15 years. Go read the early days of FREEvpFREE or LVA Sports or WoV where Rob is involved. Countless individuals have tried to debate with Rob over the merit's of Rob's tactics at video poker. It starts along the lines of "Mr. Singer, I disagree with your tactics at video poker and here is why...." and Rob's response is along the lines of "You filthy disgusting addicted gambler...."

    Rob has made countless attacks on Bob Dancer and Jean Scott over the years calling them filthy disgusting addicted gamblers. But have you ever read anything from them attacking him. No, you haven't. A prime example is kewlj, a new member here. Without provocation Rob made a gratuitous blistering attack on him.

    Sling, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee. You need to start dealing with reality. Singer's system should of made you rich by now if it really works. Instead of doing it once a week like Rob said he did you could do it once a day, twice a day, and in short order you should have parlayed up to the 1/2/5/10/25/100 level that Rob said he played at. And then hit the big time. But you haven't done that have you?

    Sling, do you have any bankroll at all? What did you say Singer has done for you?
    I thought you were on the wagon??

    Your problem with what sling does us you can't separate someone who's addicted to the machines like you are, from someone who does it only for low-level entertainment when they have the time to do it. Yet at the same time you readily deflect the fact that I indeed worked the strategy very successfully for ten years, and I've done even better since then by using ARTT.

    Your a bad apologist for Dancer and now Jean Scott. They've both spewed lies about me many times on various forums. Only difference? Dancer's were gate & envy-based; Jean's were dunce-like. You know, sort of like the nonsense you come out with---drunk OR sober.

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill View Post
    both of you know this, and why you both don`t engage me
    Stop...I already buried you back when you used to call yourself LoneStarHorse.

    90% of your posts are one-liners that show you are mentally ill, if anyone is on the chopping block around here it's gotta be sicko Biloxi Bill.

    Once Dan started talking about banning people, then all of the sudden you start posting more than one stupid sentence at a time...so now you post multiple stupid sentences at a time.

    You are your parents' worst nightmare boy, not mine.
    This is funny stuff!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Huffington Post -- too slow to bother with
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Movies, Media, and Television
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2014, 07:46 PM
  2. Caesars sent me a post-trip survey
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-09-2014, 10:59 AM
  3. How To Post Photos
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-24-2014, 07:12 PM
  4. After Christmas 2012 Sales -- Post them here!
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Money, Shopping, Real Estate, Investing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-23-2012, 04:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •