Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 48

Thread: What gives?

  1. #1
    What ever happened to Redietz`s package that he sent?.....obviously nutless wonder Rob knows the content as he has suddenly developed a severe case or laryngitis on the subject and moved on to Micky`s drinking again.....but what about Alan (I pay lease on an office space in Los Angeles, but haven`t been there in over a month) Mendelson?......I thought this was supposed to be some subjective "reporter"?......Alan is never shy to ask for things (a picture of Micky personally, Micky`s road trip pics, anyone to post photos of BJ tables next to them, etc)....never shy of posting proof of himself (his and his GF`s royals, his slew of lady hags, and pictures of a revolving door,food, etc)....but he also seems to have the same case of laryngitis his butt pal Singer has......oh, but wait....he hasn`t gone to his office in over a month .......some low moral fortitude all the way around if you ask me

  2. #2
    It's still at the office. I have a partner in the office. I don't need to be there except for once or twice a month. There's been no reason for me to go.

    I never asked redietz to send it. He confirmed that. Sorry I'm not making a 20 mile one way trip for just the package.

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    It's still at the office. I have a partner in the office. I don't need to be there except for once or twice a month.
    On Thursday, July 27, you posted that you had received the package. That is 5 weeks ago today. If you go to the office once or twice a month...then what's going on?

    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    There's been no reason for me to go. I never asked redietz to send it. He confirmed that.
    You may not of asked redietz to send the info. But challenges were made of redietz. Based on you constantly touting your integrity as a reporter, redietz chose YOU, to be that objective reporter to settle the matter. And you have and continue to fail big time based on your now 5 weeks worth of delays. It is more than obvious to everyone interested that these delay tactics are an effort hoping this will all go away to avoid embarrassment to Rob, who you oddly seem to admire and support. What you have done is show your complete lack of integrity by this now 5 week delay tactic.

    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Sorry I'm not making a 20 mile one way trip for just the package.
    20 miles?....big deal. If I remember correctly, you jumped up in the middle of the night at 3am, and ran to the strip to take blurry pictures of empty blackjack tables (from the wrong seats and angles) attempting to prove me wrong. You proved nothing except that you don't understand and can't comprehend...but that is besides the point. The point is you went out of your way at 3am, hoping to prove your point, but here when you know that the redietz information is damaging to challenges made by someone you support, you are dragging your feet. You continue to look dishonest and like a man with zero integrity to me.

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

    On Thursday, July 27, you posted that you had received the package. That is 5 weeks ago today. If you go to the office once or twice a month...then what's going on?



    You may not of asked redietz to send the info. But challenges were made of redietz. Based on you constantly touting your integrity as a reporter, redietz chose YOU, to be that objective reporter to settle the matter. And you have and continue to fail big time based on your now 5 weeks worth of delays. It is more than obvious to everyone interested that these delay tactics are an effort hoping this will all go away to avoid embarrassment to Rob, who you oddly seem to admire and support. What you have done is show your complete lack of integrity by this now 5 week delay tactic.

    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Sorry I'm not making a 20 mile one way trip for just the package.
    20 miles?....big deal. If I remember correctly, you jumped up in the middle of the night at 3am, and ran to the strip to take blurry pictures of empty blackjack tables (from the wrong seats and angles) attempting to prove me wrong. You proved nothing except that you don't understand and can't comprehend...but that is besides the point. The point is you went out of your way at 3am, hoping to prove your point, but here when you know that the redietz information is damaging to challenges made by someone you support, you are dragging your feet. You continue to look dishonest and like a man with zero integrity to me.
    He said he needed gas LOL

  5. #5
    What's going on is that I don't need to go to the office. Thank you for your interest.

  6. #6
    Redietz I'm going to tell Tony in my office to send the envelope back. I never wanted it. Is the correct mailing address on it?

  7. #7
    Nice reporter....guess only if the facts don`t suit you and your buddy, you just won`t report it.....WEAK
    Last edited by Biloxi Bill; 08-31-2017 at 04:07 PM.

  8. #8
    That's some real good reporting you're doing there, Alan. Next time you're going to call yourself a reporter with credibility, care about the truth, and being honest, etc etc......just don't, as lying is dishonest. I figured you were in Vegas for a few weeks when the package first arrived so didn't want to accuse you of being unfair, lazy, poor reporter, etc.....but now you're stopping pretty low. It's pitiful.

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Redietz I'm going to tell Tony in my office to send the envelope back. I never wanted it. Is the correct mailing address on it?
    It would be just as easy for him to forward it to your residence. Your great, wonderful friend, that no one likes but you, goaded redeitz unmercifully over this. You sending the package back will just give Rob the ammuntion back to go after redietz again. Hey, no sweat off your back though, right? It's unbeivable how you continue to protect and enable Rob.

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    It would be just as easy for him to forward it to your residence.
    It would be just as easy...even easier...to post whatever he sent to Alan right here on this forum.

    That could have been done days, weeks, months, and years ago.
    Last edited by coach belly; 08-31-2017 at 08:00 PM.

  11. #11
    Are you serious Alan? You now have lost any credibility that you had. You have zero credibility!

    You guys make these challenges (and even if you didn't in this case, you often do, so I am lumping you in with the others), and when someone like Redietz provides proof, which in my opinion was against better judgment, what do you do....can't be bothered even looking at the proof. Redietz trusted you to be fair and objective and you failed big time!

    I suspected both you and Singer wouldn't have accepted anything redietz could have provided, but I didn't expect you to sink to this level. You have really shown your character on this one and it isn't pretty.

    I've tried to be respectful and give you the benefit of the doubt, but you are a joke. You have proven once again to be a rather dishonest person, in my book, and basically on the same trolling level as Singer.

  12. #12
    In fact I asked redietz to post everything here on the forum and he didn't want to. I made no promises to him about his package.

    Many people remember me from when I was a consumer reporter and an investigative reporter. I still get letters and emails and calls to the office asking me for help. But now CBS isn't paying me to do it. Nor is Fox. Nor is CNN.

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    In fact I asked redietz to post everything here on the forum and he didn't want to. I made no promises to him about his package.
    You want someone to post personal information and data on a public forum to satisfy some anonymous naysayer/hater? You have completely lost touch with reality.


    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Many people remember me from when I was a consumer reporter and an investigative reporter. I still get letters and emails and calls to the office asking me for help. But now CBS isn't paying me to do it. Nor is Fox. Nor is CNN.
    And this has what to do with what? You are really baffling.

  14. #14
    One more thing and this should end this: I don't doubt redietz at all. I told him he didn't have to prove anything to me. But kewlj you have to prove to me you can count cards at two tables.

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    But kewlj you have to prove to me you can count cards at two tables.
    ahhh...NO...I don't!

    I don't have to prove anything to you sir and frankly there is no benefit to me attempting to do so. You are free to believe whatever you like. Whatever you chose to believe is completely irrelevant. It isn't going to effect me, my life, or livelihood one bit.

  16. #16
    That's fine. But so far no one here has said they could go to a casino and read the cards on a nearby table... just as I showed in my photos. You don't have to prove your super vision or x-ray vision. If you have it good for you.

    Back to redietz. I never doubted him. Why he cares about Rob is beyond me.

    Meanwhile Rob is having the laugh of a lifetime right now. Do you know what he's thinking? He's thinking "even when I say nothing I'm the most talked about gaming expert in the world."

    Yes you made him a giant.

  17. #17
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    You don't have to prove your super vision or x-ray vision. If you have it good for you.
    I don't have super or x-ray vision. But I can identify the value of cards from 6-8 feet away.

    I think most of us can identify the value of different cards from 20, 30 feet away.

    Here is a simple experiment I want you to try. Take a deck of cards and shuffle them. Select 3 cards from the middle of the deck with out looking at them. Place them on the floor face up without looking at them (looking away). Walk 10 feet away and turn and tell me what the cards are. If you can't see the value of the cards, I think we have identified what your problem is.

  18. #18
    You can't see thru people, can you?
    You can't see cards in play at a second table when you're looking at your own table. There are too many holes.

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    That's fine. But so far no one here has said they could go to a casino and read the cards on a nearby table... just as I showed in my photos. You don't have to prove your super vision or x-ray vision. If you have it good for you.

    Back to redietz. I never doubted him. Why he cares about Rob is beyond me.

    Meanwhile Rob is having the laugh of a lifetime right now. Do you know what he's thinking? He's thinking "even when I say nothing I'm the most talked about gaming expert in the world."

    Yes you made him a giant.
    I remember someone caring about Rob enough to post on other sites that he had a legal plan in place for Rob and Gaming Today if Rob went ahead and mentioned him as an addict in a GT article. The article, of course, never happened. So some people are sensitive when others libel them online and in print.

    Meanwhile, the majority of what I sent to Alan was copyrighted. I already said this ages ago multiple times, but you can't just post copyrighted material online unless you abide by "fair use" rules, which usually apply to reviews, criticism, or parodies. Since the material quoted would or could be construed as advertising for me, it is also not considered for non-profit educational use. I'm pretty sure it also wouldn't be considered a scholarly article (I could be wrong), so that's out, too. I find it ridiculous that people think they can just plop copyrighted material down online with no thought to the owners of the material.

    I'm gonna give Rob some credit here. He was probably hoping I'd post copyrighted material so my ass would be in a sling. That's why he pushed so hard for it.

    Alan, I suggest, since you have Dan's address, that you just send the stuff on to Dan. I figured this was a likely outcome, but I wanted to see it play out.
    Last edited by redietz; 08-31-2017 at 11:00 PM.

  20. #20
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    You can't see thru people, can you?
    You can't see cards in play at a second table when you're looking at your own table. There are too many holes.
    I don't have to see thru people. Sitting in the center of the table, which provides for an easy view of the next table with minimal effort, you can only be possibly blocked from seeing the playing surface (felt) by one seat at each table. That would be the 4 th seat to the table to the right and the second seat to the table to the left. And often but not always, just a slight shift (and that means shifting your body, not the chair) a few inches and you can still see what you need to see. Not always....but often!

    You don't want to grasp this concept because....well....you don't want to grasp this concept. You have made up your closed mind, so let's drop it. Life is too short to go over and over the same shit. Believe the earth is flat if it makes you happy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •