Is it just me or do a significant amount of people seem a bit bipolar on the forums?
Is it just me or do a significant amount of people seem a bit bipolar on the forums?
KJ, I don't dislike you; I don't know you.
All I know of you is what you've written on message boards.
What I dislike about your posts is how "you wear your heart on your sleeve."
I'm not homophobic, but one thing you gays do that goes against the grain of manliness is to act feminine via venting, emoting, and pulling your hair out while listing ad nauseum all the slights others hurl your way.
Why not just cowboy up and move on?
This nonsense about you being banned at WoV is a prime example: you just won't shut up about it, and drag out that hoary chestnut whenever the opportunity arises.
I read it once: that was enough.
The AP / anti-AP discussion should be a walk in the park for you, yet you let it derail you; why?
It's all just shits and giggles, isn't it?
What, Me Worry?
I would never let this crap derail me, especially to the point it has others. But, I can see how it can get very exhausting and frustrating having to respond to all the haters who love to troll. It's one thing if you have to respond to a few skeptics here and there, but It's hard to ignore people attacking and challenging everything you say every step of the way.
Look at the BS Alan pulled with me regarding me being ruffed up in a casino. He kept asking questions about the situation, and I explained. It was fairly obvious what the situation was. It was obvious I was not claiming casino security guards just go around beating up VP players at random. Once he realized that there was evidence to what I was saying, he tried to play childish word games.
You got guys like Rob Singer making up complete lies. He was claiming he had someone investigate and follow me around the casinos or some BS like that. I wasn't even posting here at the time he said that shit.
That's exactly right. It's most likely the same spiel Alan gave Dan. Feigning he is in fear for his life and afraid to post until KJ is banned. And if KJ were banned Alan would happily return. That's a joke. If Alan had a real reason to be afraid it wouldn't matter whether KJ were banned or not. If Alan does stop posting here its because he's pissed he can't get his buddy Singer back on the site....even as a sock puppet.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Alan's gonna quit posting here or something? Good.
Good riddance.
You'll find him posting his ever pithy and piquant observations about gambling at eighteenyosinarow.com.
What, Me Worry?
Agreed. What does Alan have to be afraid off me. I didn't even address him yesterday. This is Alan manipulating as he always does. Same as he did with the tracking two blackjack tables thing. Same as he did with Axel's machine backoff/barring. Same as he did with the whole redietz package thing. And same as he has done with just about everything involving Singer. Alan is a manipulator. He plays games... period. Including playing dumb when it serves him. And now he is playing "scared"....he is afraid of KJ, who said absolutely nothing to him yesterday.
If Alan wants to leave, the he should leave. I hope he doesn't, but that is his call. I can't say the same for blackhole. I hope blackhole does leave. The difference in my mind is I have never seen blackhole post anything that was useful or meant as a positive contribution. All he does is attack and tear down others. I mean blackhole goes as far as to repeatedly state that Axel contributes nothing useful to the site. How ridiculous is that? A guy that would even make such a statement has a completely alterior motive and agenda.
Alan on the other hand, is anti-AP, but that is not ALL he is about. He makes some positive contributions. As I think mickey said this morning, their is some weird connection between Alan and Singer. And simple friendship doesn't explain it. Mickey suggested some kind of money connection? I have no idea about something like that. Seems like speculation, but I think it is fair to say there is something more to this connection than meets the eye.
And I want to repeat one more time, that while I hope Alan decides to continue participating, if he honestly <- feels he and I can not co-exist, I will leave it up to the membership to decide which off us should step aside and will abide by that decision, which I suspect may not favor me. I am not going to initiate the poll. If Alan decides he wants to, or someone else feels they want to on his behalf, fine.
Correction: It was Axel who suggested some monetary connection between Alan and Singer, not mickey as I mistakenly suggested. Sorry, mickey.
Last edited by kewlJ; 10-25-2017 at 07:23 PM.
Maybe he is going back to Wov. How would you feel about that?
Is Alan actually banned at wov or did he leave of his own accord? I was somehow under the impression he just left on his own after members were frequently giving him a hard time about the 18 straight yo's. I suspect I was there at the time but I do not remember. I just didn't pay much attention to the craps threads.
I think I was the one who suspected there was a monetary connection. Perhaps its something as simple as Alan thinking he brings traffic to his site or whatever.
Don't forget his repeated nonsense related to the two dice problem and the fact that he basically claims there is not much, if any, value in a loss rebate and his nonsense about free play. It's just his annoying endless contradictory stance when it comes to anything AP related. He tries to set people up while useing or creating loopholes and technicalities.
Yes, he left on his own accord after catching a raft full of well-deserved shit for his now infamous claim of watching eighteen yo's rolled in a row at Caesars.
He can return there at any time, but the Wiz has since adopted a rule that says if you voluntarily resign you cannot change your mind and join again until at least thirty days have passed.
What, Me Worry?
yes, in re-reading, I caught that it was you that suggested a possible monetary link. I edited that just a few minutes prior to this post. I am sorry I didn't give you credit for this "conspiracy theory".
"Setting people up"," loopholes" and "technicalities" is exactly what I am referring to when I say manipulates. Manipulates just covers a broader base.
He left WoV on his own accord. And, KJ, his statement that he is afraid of you is as phony as a three dollar bill. It's just a convenient pretext for him to boycott the site. He wants you off this site because you are way to good at describing his flaws/faults. He's really got the red ass over it.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Mister v. You are well within your right to feel how ever you like about anyone, including categorizing of groups you aren't comfortable with or dislike. And you don't have to explain that to me or anyone.
However....are you sure you don't want to re-think this phrase (regardless of what followed).
"I am not homophobic, but here is my problem with you gays". regardless of what follows you are categorizing a group of people, based on a stereotypical characteristic that you dislike. Mister v, that is the definition of prejudice, including racial, homophobic or other prejudices.
I mean lets change the words just a bit and maybe you will see what I am saying.
"I am not a racist, but I just don't like the way blacks are lazy".
or how about " I am not racist, but I just don't like the Latinos because they commit a lot of crime. (geez this one sounds like a Donald trump line).
With your actual statement it is "you are not homophobic but you just don't like the way you gays act feminine".
Do you see what I am saying. Initial statement says I am not this or that. Followed immediately by a prejudice thought completely contradicting that first disclaimer and completely proving how you are racial, homophobic or otherwise prejudice. (in this actual case homophobic).
Again, I am not challenging what you believe or feel or your right to believe or feel that way. I am simply pointing out that your statement as written, actually proves the very thing that you claim you are not.
I disagree with your analysis, KJ.
Femininity is a quirk of gays that I have observed over my lifetime: it is what it is.
I put up with it; it is not what I consider "normal" male behavior, i.e. straight male behavior.
Perhaps I should have clarified: I am referring to gay men, not women.
Those bull dykes are an entirely different bottle of mustard.
What, Me Worry?
Being aware of our differences doesn't make someone racist, sexist, homophobic, or any other buzzword. Racism is when you think one race is superior to another. Sexism is when you think one sex (gender) is superior to another. Homophobia is when you dislike gay people.
If I need a dog sitter, I'm probably not going to ask the black guy, because they are usually scared of dogs.
https://www.snopes.com/racial/humor/fearmost.asp Usually I trust snopes, but on this one....not so much. LOL @ registered mail
Some good reading here, too, especially the comments: https://verysmartbrothas.theroot.com...ked-1799387087
Last edited by RS__; 10-26-2017 at 02:16 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)