If the roll is determined by computer, how are the dice controlled? Are there strings or magnets? Please be specific with your answer.
If the roll is determined by computer, how are the dice controlled? Are there strings or magnets? Please be specific with your answer.
I don't know. I am perfectly comfortable with saying that I don't know. And by the way....this is one of many things in life I don't know and to be honest don't even care that much about. But, I don't need to make thing up and state them as definitive fact as you do.
Does this mean that the results of the dice "rolls" are not random, but are determined by the player bets and the casino hold?
If yes, then can a player fully hedge the e-craps games by betting both lines simultaneously?
How can the casino hold be achieved under those circumstances?
KJ who said this?
I too want to know how the machine supposedly makes the dice land per the RNG. I'm not buying it. I think there's enough shaking, vibrating and poping that the dice end up being as random as it can get.
The RNG does not tell the dice how to land IMO.
Even if it did, just like in VP, they can't adjust the RNG to determine the desired hold(I believe that's what Travis is claiming about the craps?) they would have to change the payouts.
Agian,
from my understanding, per Nevada Gaming, anything using dice or cards must be random and represent real dice outcomes. If that's the case, it would not make sense, at least here in NV that machine percentages could be adjusted using the RNG, they would have to change the payouts.
I have already touched on that using roulette as an example. It's a good question, however, most people don't bet that way. If the machine is self-adjusting to get the desired hold would it would have to target individual bettors after they made their bets. I'm fairly certain this would be Illegal cheating by the casino.
Alan, I'm not arguing with you about how the machines work. IIRC you didn't think they were considered slots in the first place. I don't know, perhaps you just wanted to prove someone wrong as per your "investigation".
I think KJ's post to you using what TM said was jumping the gun.
In the past, I was thinking about linking you to some stuff online(one was about a 150% loss rebate). I just figured you would dispute if it was legitimate or not.
So I'm just curious when you link to articles online whats the determining factor if that article is correct or not?
Do you get to pick and choose if the information is correct or not depending if it hurts or helps your argument?
Personally, I try to find multiple sources(that's not always available), and then I try to determine what sounds reasonable and logical.
My understanding is that roulette can not be fully hedged, that there is no combination of bets that are guaranteed to return 100%
for every outcome.
Can e-craps be fully hedged, with a combination of bets that are guaranteed to return 100%?
If yes, can one player make those bets from the same position?
There is no mystery as to how the game works. I will get the official answer from either the company or the Technology Department at the NGC. Contrary to the claims of a certain forum members these things are not secrets.
So the way to go about things then is to simply go to a crowded (but with one empty seat) communal Interblock station consisting of civilians, sit down in the empty seat, and then bet a smaller, mutually exclusive bet (with respect to what the civilians are betting) and profit. The machine will choose the path of highest Casino EV. Simple example: the aggregate civilian Pass Line Bet is ~$3000, so the non-Civilian bets $2995 (assuming it's below the table max) on the don't side . . .
I agree that could work in theory. I have yet to hear anyone claim that's whats happening. Not even Travis who has supposedly investigated this extensively. Here is what he said....
"An Aruze (a Philipines company BTW) maintenance mechanic verified to me that the big red dice have an RFID chip and showed me the inside of the big red dice. He also showed me the DOS looking program that reads the RFID chip so that they know when to replace die A or die B if it is not getting the wanted results"
Let's pretend they do use magnets, and they do alter the outcomes to achieve the desired HA. Do you think this would be considered cheating?
Just got off the phone with the Technology Department of the NGC.
1. The RNG is called a "mechanical RNG" and while I never heard that before it simply means it controls the bouncing and vibration of the table that propels the dice.
2. There is no computer controlling the dice and the dice are random. There are sensors in the dice that tell the game how the dice land.
3. Yes the game must meet the theoretical 75% return and this is determined both by looking at the available bets and pays but also by monitoring machine performance. If a machine falls out of this 75% return they will examine the machine for any possible problems such as wear on the dice.
As I said all along this game was all about a vibrating and bouncing table platform propelling the dice.
If you don't believe me call the NGC yourself.
Would you be willing to prove this claim to him privately?
If you do have his address, I have to assume you estimated when he may have looked at your website and used his IP to determine his address?
I would NOT want to go to your website knowing you might use it to obtain someone's address, no matter what the reason may be.
I would suggest everyone stay away from your website if that's the case.
Axel I questioned whether the game was a slot because I knew slots had to have the 75% theoretical return. The game does indeed have to meet the 75% theo return. See my post above.
At a real craps table no one is monitoring for a 75% return, theoretical or otherwise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)