The WoV Thread

[kewlJ]

Mickeycrimm the me me me kid immediately launched his anti-AP tirade because he wouldn't, or couldn't, explain how losing so much money gave him his best gambling day. He still hasn't revealed his secret formula for claiming a win when he loses real dollars.

Anyone making such a claim needs to understand it will need a lengthy explanation. There was no explanation. I was just anti-AP.

At least he did explain his two table counting and conceded he couldn't see all the cards. I had hope for him there. But it was a false hope... I'm still anti-AP in his mind.

And you mickeycrimm? I still haven't said a bad word about you.

This is just not that complicated. This is supposedly a gambling forum. Hense the name Vegas Casino Talk.

So you have a player, who has supported himself...now for 15 years from mostly blackjack play (and a bit of other AP activity). Winnings of over $920,000 from blackjack, well of a million dollars overall. And he (I) shares some of his experiences, techniques and wisdom of how he plays. None of which is unique to him....all came from successful and smarter players before him.

And then you have a guy, a shyster, a snake oil salesman (for a living), challenging everything the player using proven techniques says. EVERYTHING! The shyster pretends he doesn't understand because he doesn't want to understand. So he ignores the facts, and twists and manipulates everything else. He SHYSTERS!

So I ask....as I always do. Who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking? The player who has earned over a million dollars from casinos, $920,000 from blackjack? Or the shyster, the dishonest salesman, who has been laughed off every gambling forum because he refuses to acknowledge that he didn't see lightning strike 18 times in a row?

[mickeycrimm]

Gosh mickeycrimm, I prefer my days playing negative EV and hitting a royal. The royal I can take to the bank. The positive EV I can't. I don't think I can even exchange it for Bitcoin.

Keep banking that positive EV though. They might monetize it someday. LOL

You continue to refuse to understand. Intransigence at its finest. All of the negative EV you've accumulated lifetime is the reason you've never had a winning year. Because of it you continue to pull money out of the bank and deposit it in the casino.

[kewlJ]

You continue to refuse to understand. Intransigence at its finest. All of the negative EV you've accumulated lifetime is the reason you've never had a winning year. Because of it you continue to pull money out of the bank and deposit it in the casino.

Intransigence. With one single word (which I had to look up), I have learned more from mickeycrimm today than Alan Mendelson in 15,900 posts.

Just imagine how much I have benefited from all Mickey's participation here and elsewhere. It is amazing what can happen when you are grounded in reality and are willing to learn. And sad when your mind is closed and you limit yourself to proven falsehoods like that the earth is flat (or 28 y.o.'s in a row).

[Alan Mendelson]

Mickeycrimm the me me me kid immediately launched his anti-AP tirade because he wouldn't, or couldn't, explain how losing so much money gave him his best gambling day. He still hasn't revealed his secret formula for claiming a win when he loses real dollars.

Anyone making such a claim needs to understand it will need a lengthy explanation. There was no explanation. I was just anti-AP.

At least he did explain his two table counting and conceded he couldn't see all the cards. I had hope for him there. But it was a false hope... I'm still anti-AP in his mind.

And you mickeycrimm? I still haven't said a bad word about you.

This is just not that complicated. This is supposedly a gambling forum. Hense the name Vegas Casino Talk.

So you have a player, who has supported himself...now for 15 years from mostly blackjack play (and a bit of other AP activity). Winnings of over $920,000 from blackjack, well of a million dollars overall. And he (I) shares some of his experiences, techniques and wisdom of how he plays. None of which is unique to him....all came from successful and smarter players before him.

And then you have a guy, a shyster, a snake oil salesman (for a living), challenging everything the player using proven techniques says. EVERYTHING! The shyster pretends he doesn't understand because he doesn't want to understand. So he ignores the facts, and twists and manipulates everything else. He SHYSTERS!

So I ask....as I always do. Who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking? The player who has earned over a million dollars from casinos, $920,000 from blackjack? Or the shyster, the dishonest salesman, who has been laughed off every gambling forum because he refuses to acknowledge that he didn't see lightning strike 18 times in a row?

Dear piece of shit: you still haven't explained how losing at your +EV game gives you some advantage. Frankly you can't. Fuck off asshole.

[Keystone]

Mickeycrimm the me me me kid immediately launched his anti-AP tirade because he wouldn't, or couldn't, explain how losing so much money gave him his best gambling day. He still hasn't revealed his secret formula for claiming a win when he loses real dollars.

Anyone making such a claim needs to understand it will need a lengthy explanation. There was no explanation. I was just anti-AP.

At least he did explain his two table counting and conceded he couldn't see all the cards. I had hope for him there. But it was a false hope... I'm still anti-AP in his mind.

And you mickeycrimm? I still haven't said a bad word about you.

This is just not that complicated. This is supposedly a gambling forum. Hense the name Vegas Casino Talk.

So you have a player, who has supported himself...now for 15 years from mostly blackjack play (and a bit of other AP activity). Winnings of over $920,000 from blackjack, well of a million dollars overall. And he (I) shares some of his experiences, techniques and wisdom of how he plays. None of which is unique to him....all came from successful and smarter players before him.

And then you have a guy, a shyster, a snake oil salesman (for a living), challenging everything the player using proven techniques says. EVERYTHING! The shyster pretends he doesn't understand because he doesn't want to understand. So he ignores the facts, and twists and manipulates everything else. He SHYSTERS!

So I ask....as I always do. Who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking? The player who has earned over a million dollars from casinos, $920,000 from blackjack? Or the shyster, the dishonest salesman, who has been laughed off every gambling forum because he refuses to acknowledge that he didn't see lightning strike 18 times in a row?

Dear piece of shit: you still haven't explained how losing at your +EV game gives you some advantage. Frankly you can't. Fuck off asshole.

It always makes my day when little fairy bitches like Mrv and Alan start cursing like some tough kick ass brawlers....lolololololololololololol....more please

[kewlJ]

Dear piece of shit: you still haven't explained how losing at your +EV game gives you some advantage. Frankly you can't. Fuck off asshole.

Remember all that bullshit you fed us about trying to honor the young girl that donated organs to extend your life? I am sure she feels so proud of you Mendelson.

[Alan Mendelson]

Listen shithead me me me. I'm not going to live in your fantasy world where losses add up to the best gambling days. A fucking loss is a fucking loss.

You may have conned others into believing your bullshit but you can't con me. Negative sessions do not add up into positive wins.

Now come up with another fairy tale.

[kewlJ]

Alan, I just feel sad for you. So bad in fact, that I am willing to spring for the headstone where your nasty, tired, old ass will soon be laying.

Here lies Alan "18 y.o.'s in a row" Mendelson.

Shyster. Conman. Dumber that a freaking door.

[Alan Mendelson]

Dear shithead me me me. Say what you want because there's no fucking way on earth you can convince anyone without fairy dust that losing will put you ahead. Now go cry yourself a river.

[Alan Mendelson]

Listen fairy dust spreader... I will NEVER post here again if you write in plain English how losing $8,500 made you better off while you "accumulated positive EV play."

Ready? Go.

[redietz]

I feel badly for Argentino. He must have died. Mr. Mendelson is channeling him.

[kewlJ]

Listen fairy dust spreader... I will NEVER post here again if you write in plain English how losing $8,500 made you better off while you "accumulated positive EV play."

Ready? Go.

Alan if your only play is to go low like your boyfriend Welfare Rob (who is off doing his community service), and you are going to continue with your homophobic hate, then don't go crying when I return volley, you big nosed, smelly Jew..

How about we bake us some Mendelbread. Hitler had the recipe down pat.

No offense to any of my Jewish friends. Comments directed only at Mendelson. From now on I return hate with hate.

[Prozema]

I believe I am capable of explaining how a small EV edge turns into guaranteed profit when enough trials occur, however it requires math and that probably doesn't meet the definition of "plain English".

[quahaug]

Does anyone think Alan really doesn't understand the difference between positive and negative ev and the effect of variance on a graph?

[RS__]

Dear piece of shit: you still haven't explained how losing at your +EV game gives you some advantage. Frankly you can't. Fuck off asshole.

U ok?

[Prozema]

Math is really hard for some people.

[RS__]

Does anyone think Alan really doesn't understand the difference between positive and negative ev and the effect of variance on a graph?

A lot of people don’t. Many people are willing to listen and learn. Alan, on the other hand, is stuck in his ways like a caveman “more money good, less money bad, so easy understand!”

[Alan Mendelson]

I believe I am capable of explaining how a small EV edge turns into guaranteed profit when enough trials occur, however it requires math and that probably doesn't meet the definition of "plain English".

You also have to account for the $8500 real loss. Now do the math.

[Prozema]

I just made up a game that pays 101% with a standard deviation of 4.447 (more variance than blackjack) and has a normal distribution. it's positive RTP to 3 standard deviations in about 1.78M trials. I'm sure someone here is capable of double checking my math... I did this pretty quickly. If a 0.5% chance of a negative result isn't good enough, we could add a couple more stand deviations where the chances of a loss is approximately equivalent to 30 yos in a row. This is how casinos make money. Lots of trials with an edge in their favor.

[Alan Mendelson]

Listen fairy dust spreader... I will NEVER post here again if you write in plain English how losing $8,500 made you better off while you "accumulated positive EV play."

Ready? Go.

Alan if your only play is to go low like your boyfriend Welfare Rob (who is off doing his community service), and you are going to continue with your homophobic hate, then don't go crying when I return volley, you big nosed, smelly Jew..

How about we bake us some Mendelbread. Hitler had the recipe down pat.

No offense to any of my Jewish friends. Comments directed only at Mendelson. From now on I return hate with hate.

I'm preserving this you Jew hater.