The WoV Thread

[mcap]

Upscale troll? Didn’t know there was such a thing. Is that sort of like “upscale sweats” that rap stars wear.

[kewlJ]

Are there upscale thieves, criminals, murderers?

And does that make these activities more acceptable?

[mcap]

Trolling is not crime. Never go full redeitz.

[kewlJ]

Trolling is not crime. Never go full redeitz.

Not saying it is a crime, although what starts as trolling can escalate to criminal, when someone takes their trolling offline into real life, showing up at someone's home, or distributing information to casinos. How many stalking cases, that escalate to murder begin as somewhat simple trolling?

Anyway, that was not my point. I just don't celebrate trolling and say things like "upscale" trolling or so and so is a top notch troll.

[Ozzy]

Trolls, socks and dupes are a very important part of an entertaining forum. Sure some dupes are repetitive one line warriors. Others are complex and very comedic. To all the QUALITY socks/dupes and trolls I salute you !

[accountinquestion]

Upscale troll? Didn’t know there was such a thing. Is that sort of like “upscale sweats” that rap stars wear.

lol. I was mostly being intentionally stupid but there are tons of not-funny trolls out there. Even pure mean trolls like Rob but without the humor. Maybe "mature trolls" would have been more accurate.

[jbjb]

I see Alan is making the same mistake about free play on video roulette I was. He's forgetting that the "even money" bets pay 2 FOR 1 and you get 2 credits back, not just 1.

[jdaewoo]

I see Alan is making the same mistake about free play on video roulette I was. He's forgetting that the "even money" bets pay 2 FOR 1 and you get 2 credits back, not just 1.

The 18 yo retard still can't wrap his head around mailers.

[tableplay]

I see Alan <snip>

Don't roll the dice if you can't pay the price - don't do it:

[Tasha]

I really don't think LCK2000 should have gotten a three day Suspension from WOV for talking shit about Slot Lady/Sarah. He would have assumed she was just another annoying YouTube Uploader. He is brand new and wouldn't have known she is a Member in Good Standing at WOV. Slot Lady hasn't posted in about 5 years. How would he have known he was talking shit about a Member in Good Standing? He wouldn't. Other People also talk about disliking Slot Lady and he would have thought he was just shooting the breeze with other People who dislike her too.

It would have been the same thing if SDGuy was a Member in Good Standing and People on WOV were like,"I don't like SDGuy videos. I find him annoying, and LCK2000 responded something like,"I don't like SDGuy videos either. I find him creepy." And he got the Suspension for calling SDGuy creepy when he thought he was just shooting the breeze with other people who admitted that they don't like SDGuy first. He should have been let off with a warning.

[jdaewoo]

Have you banned yourself from every casino yet you filthy degenerate?

[jbjb]

I like Alan's thoughts on UTH that you can't win at it.

[jdaewoo]

I like Alan's thoughts on UTH that you can't win at it.

The 18 yo retard thinks it's impossible to profit off mailers yet is convinced MDawg wins 116 of every 118 sessions. Of course he doesn't think anyone can have a winning session at a low house edge table game. If you even tried to describe the potential of HC the game to him he'd probably have a stroke, shit himself, and fall over dead on the ground.

[jbjb]

I like Alan's thoughts on UTH that you can't win at it.

The 18 yo retard thinks it's impossible to profit off mailers yet is convinced MDawg wins 116 of every 118 sessions.

Now theres a new guy wanting math info on HC'ing TCP. Mcallister gave the correct advice.....DON'T BOTHER. In the HC world, TCP is akin to counting cards in blackjack. Just a complete waste of resources and time for little money.

[jdaewoo]

Yeah, unless you have perfect 1 card knowledge and nobody is every going to glance at your folds. Even then 3%+ isn't anything to write home about unless you're playing heads up.

Now the 18 yo retard thinks "MIT" says dice throws aren't random. Hint retard, "MIT" isn't a person. If you're citing a research paper then cite the fucking paper, you cunt.

[jbjb]

Yeah, unless you have perfect 1 card knowledge and nobody is every going to glance at your folds. Even then 3%+ isn't anything to write home about unless you're playing heads up.

Now the 18 yo retard thinks "MIT" says dice throws aren't random. Hint retard, "MIT" isn't a person. If you're citing a research paper then cite the fucking paper, you cunt.

I'm not buying the "99% of gamblers are ahead" bullshit either.

[Alan Mendelson]

Now the 18 yo retard thinks "MIT" says dice throws aren't random. Hint retard, "MIT" isn't a person. If you're citing a research paper then cite the fucking paper, you cunt.

https://www.insidescience.org/news/d...pletely-random

[Alan Mendelson]

I'm not buying the "99% of gamblers are ahead" bullshit either.

[tableplay]

Now the 18 yo retard thinks "MIT" says dice throws aren't random. Hint retard, "MIT" isn't a person. If you're citing a research paper then cite the fucking paper, you cunt.

https://www.insidescience.org/news/d...pletely-random

The LID used this knowledge to decimate casinos across the world along with some strategic capping by Barney.

[MisterV]

I note that the dice throwing study did not result in any probability info which might be of use.

By that I mean we can only guess as to the "edge," expressed as a percent, that the result will be the top die.

Less than one-hundredth of one percent deviation from expected value perhaps?