In another thread, Singer said:
To be clear, Singer, that I think you have a basically okay life and don't really need these forums other than to agitate from time-to-time doesn't change that you're still a worthless fucking idiot.
You think you're making a point, but I literally stipulated pretty much precisely what you said in a post before that:
See? Already acknowledged. If I am not going to read things critically and make my own decisions from that, then why would I even post here or anywhere? Of course I don't claim to 100% know that KewlJ's stories are true.
I didn't say, "No inconsistencies," I said, "Remarkably consistent." I could see how those two statements might read the same to someone with very limited intellectual faculties, such as yourself.
And, I would say to people with similar intellectual limitations just to assume that every single person is lying about every single thing and not to believe a single thing said on ANY message board. If you're not smart enough to critically examine statements, then best just to believe everything is a lie.
"No inconsistencies," would mean that I have read every post of his and there are no inconsistencies. Start with I have not read every post of KewlJ's, perhaps 25% of them just on the forums we share which ignores that he posts on forums upon which I have read 0% of his posts as I have never been there.
"Remarkably consistent," just says that I have read enough posts over a long enough period of time that, if he were substantially lying, (rather than substantially telling the truth, because I don't think anyone tells the truth 100% of the time) I would be shocked not to run into a bigger and more blatant contradiction.
Do you want me to put a number on it? Okay, I am 80% confident that KewlJ's stories and existence as a Las Vegas card counter are basically true.