Originally Posted by
tableplay
I believe it was under his LMR sock that he said he was leaving VCT (or words to that effect) but then came back and posted under his somewhat dormant account Garnabby. So actually Garnabby was an older sock account, but because of this sock's relative dormancy it was not banned and is now being used anew (I guess we could check on how old the account is, but I don't think either of us care enough to do that). A sure telltale sign of a Bill Yung sock is that, eventually, if not right away, the sock will start posting new age numerlogical gunk.
Ha, how easy to make up stuff, to fit your not-so-hidden "agenda", let alone about other posters, and, then, well, claim just that, "I guess we could check on how old the account is, but I don't think either of us care enough to do that." I guess that you've done the same with every thing else you've posted on line.
First off, there was no Garnabby account here, until a few months ago, when I signed up, with the same old IP I used for the other "socks", to note that I would put up the theory of everything here.
Secondly, "new age numerological gunk", as far as I know, has to do with trying to relate the numbers of famous person's recent deaths. This isn't mathematical numerology, which has to do with the overall numbers of overall real and actual mathematics and physics. Regardless, I didn't start to do anything with the latter, until about four years ago, as it surfaced vaguely in real time in the latter of the Bill Yung series of posts. When my theory of everything began to "spit" out numbers in general, and specific in the area such as 137, which is the integer approximation of the inverse of the electromagnetic fine-structure constant. Say, go find me a professional theoretical physicist who doesn't think that numbers like 137 lie at the heart of such a theory.
I worked on my own theory, for about thirty years. Every few years, I would go back to try to calibrate, etc, it with the elements of the chemical periodic table of elements. The whole point of my own theory wasn't to try to "force" it in any direction, so, these latest numbers could arise, or not, on their very own.
So, I am, on the fly, finishing up with piecing together also the "mathematical numerology" bits in my own theory of everything. There is an area of mathematics called recreational numbers. Some take it somewhat seriously, although, I guess, most don't. The mathematical numerology approach is one way to tie it in with regular mathematics.
When I begin to post up the theory, and, then, flesh it out some, it will become abundantly clear that it's based in real and actual mathematics and physics. Ha, I guess the thought of this scares the living daylight out of you. Another clear and present threat to yours, and the others', delusions about also gambling per se.
Thirdly, I already wrote, to specifically you, that the most of the numbers I've posted here were in good fun. But, for the obvious reason above, you have to tell yourself that I really and actually mean these as such, this type and degree of theory. Look, as far as the fun stuff went, these few numbers, you have to admit that the fun coincidences were beyond a reasonable doubt. Almost or totally inexplicable, if I do say so, myself.