Page 335 of 501 FirstFirst ... 235285325331332333334335336337338339345385435 ... LastLast
Results 6,681 to 6,700 of 10013

Thread: The WoV Thread

  1. #6681
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    I suspect that whomever MDawg works for, or whatever family member funds his vegas trips will look at this situation and fund MDawgs play in order to scoop up the 2k. Therefore, I think this is dumb and proves absolutely nothing other than the fact that even -EV gamblers can see when they are hit in the face with a valuable opportunity. Hell, there is no way to even know if it will be MDawg himself placing the bets. If it were me I would make sure it was in fact MDawg himself who was doing the playing. I would be suspicious if suddenly MDawg had a friend or family member with him.
    There is still a possibility that you are 100% right about Mdawg not being the person that bets and gets these comps and all, but instead is a friend , employee or family member of. While it looks a little less likely than say a week ago, you could still be 100% right and I wouldn't bet against you, because you are pretty good at the BS detection.

    BUT, there is also the possibility that Mdawg is basically who he says he is. (I don't believe the lawyer because even lowlife lawyers types don't act like he does), but he could be a guy with family money that is a somewhat highroller. In that case the part he is leaving out is all the losing, which qualified for the perks. I think this is a real possibility as well. But the story, the great fairytale as he tells it.....not a chance!
    ROTFLMAO. KJ please think back to all the crazy claimed he has mand and add some logic to that and tell me there's a chance.

  2. #6682
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    this won’t prove anything
    What if Mike's evaluation is damaging or negative, that whatever he
    witnesses doesn't confirm much or any of what MDawg has claimed?

    Then will you accept his evaluation?
    No because what I read, and I haven’t kept up on the exact details today, won’t prove anything I don’t already believe.

    I have made it clear before I believe MD is a rich guy, and much of what he says is semi true. I believe he is in Vegas playing at semi high stakes and is staying comped in suites..
    Name:  FP....JPG
Views: 375
Size:  60.3 KB

  3. #6683
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    this won’t prove anything
    What if Mike's evaluation is damaging or negative, that whatever he
    witnesses doesn't confirm much or any of what MDawg has claimed?

    Then will you accept his evaluation?
    Nothing negative will be reported. That's just not Mike's style, he will report what he had seen regarding the betting or whatever else MDawg wants him to believe. If Mike sees something super scammy or blatantly off I think he would report that, but I doubt MDawg is going to mess up that bad. I never thought MDawg was dumb.


    If Mdawg plays solo and places an average of 1k per hand over 57 hands then I will be more inclined to believe some of what he has been saying.

  4. #6684
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    People who brag about their (alleged) wealth to strangers on anonymous message boards obviously have issues with self esteem
    People who constantly criticize others also obviously have issues with self esteem.

    For someone with low self-esteem, lashing out or becoming aggressive towards others
    is a defense mechanism.

    Insecure people often use criticism of others as a way to feel better about themselves.

    So there's that.
    Indeed, that can certainly be the case.

    Take your comments for example: they are typically critical of others as well as quite aggressive.

    Not that that actually PROVES anything, just "food for thought."
    What, Me Worry?

  5. #6685
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    this won’t prove anything
    What if Mike's evaluation is damaging or negative, that whatever he
    witnesses doesn't confirm much or any of what MDawg has claimed?

    Then will you accept his evaluation?
    Nothing negative will be reported. That's just not Mike's style, he will report what he had seen regarding the betting or whatever else MDawg wants him to believe. If Mike sees something super scammy or blatantly off I think he would report that, but I doubt MDawg is going to mess up that bad. I never thought MDawg was dumb.


    If Mdawg plays solo and places an average of 1k per hand over 57 hands then I will be more inclined to believe some of what he has been saying.
    Sounds like you kind of agree and disagree with me, and what KJ suggested. With no clue how this ends up, I’m not sure what’s in it for MDawg if he can’t at least “prove” he plays high stakes, or have the cash to do it for this exercise. So if he does as you say and he bets close to 1K for 57 hands, it still doesn’t prove much to me in regards to his claims of wins.

    It might show he is the rich guy I believe he is, or at least is acting like he is. And most people couldn’t pull this kind of bankroll trick off, and the bigger question is why would they even try? Not sure what’s in this for MD other than more attention.

    I personally hope it happens, but you, I and others will still have more questions then answers. But even with all my issues with Mike, I do believe he will at least be able to confirm there is someone willing to admit they are MD and they have access to substantial funds and are willing to wager them.

  6. #6686
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Not that that actually PROVES anything, just "food for thought."
    Agreed...regarding my posts, it doesn't prove anything.

    Regarding your posts...your insecurity and self esteem issues are obvious.

    Don't accept that?...just go back and review your posting history.

    Hostility is the prevailing theme...that PROVES something.

  7. #6687
    Betting 1k avg bet over 57 hands, doesn't require that big of a bankroll. Once again proves NOTHING. If he were to bet 5x-10x that over the same span, thats a little different. With his "funds" he shouldn't sweat that action in the least bit.

  8. #6688
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    But even with all my issues with Mike, I do believe he will at least be able to confirm there is someone willing to admit they are MD and they have access to substantial funds and are willing to wager them.
    MDawg can only present casino records as evidence of his past wins,
    Mike can report on what he believes that the records prove.

    But some have insisted that the entire Adventures of MDawg are totally fabricated,
    that those aren't his photos, that he's not a H/L bac player, he has no line of credit,
    he hasn't visited LV for weeks at a time, he hasn't been comped weeks-long stays in suites,
    that he's not even in Vegas right now.

    Mike's examination should reveal how much of all that is true.

  9. #6689
    Originally Posted by Ozzy View Post
    Betting 1k avg bet over 57 hands, doesn't require that big of a bankroll. Once again proves NOTHING. If he were to bet 5x-10x that over the same span, thats a little different. With his "funds" he shouldn't sweat that action in the least bit.
    Which leads to the question many of us have had from the start....Why isn’t someone who can win at will as he claims, never loses and is with an almost limitless bankroll NOT betting 5x-10x that as you ask?

  10. #6690
    Originally Posted by Ozzy View Post
    Betting 1k avg bet over 57 hands, doesn't require that big of a bankroll.
    My understanding is the required bankroll can be mathematically determined.

  11. #6691
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Which leads to the question many of us have had from the start....Why isn’t someone who can win at will as he claims, never loses and is with an almost limitless bankroll NOT betting 5x-10x that as you ask?
    Originally Posted by darkoz
    Because I am a human being of free will who can make those choices

    Why do people who vomit the day after they drink heavy still do it?

    Why do people who know smoking causes lung cancer still do it?

    Human choice, what an interesting foible

  12. #6692
    Originally Posted by coach belly
    Agreed...regarding my posts, it doesn't prove anything.

    Regarding your posts...your insecurity and self esteem issues are obvious.

    Don't accept that?...just go back and review your posting history.

    Hostility is the prevailing theme...that PROVES something.
    Pot ---> kettle ---> black

    Your posts are much more hostile than mine, generally speaking.

    Oh sure, I get ramped up on a few issues, such as DoofDawg's claim that he never loses and drove his daddy's Rolls to a nightclub when he was a teen, but most of my posts are actually NOT hostile.

    Think it over, coach: you are in somr sort of serius denial if you cannot see yourself as a hostile poster.
    What, Me Worry?

  13. #6693
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Your posts are much more hostile than mine, generally speaking.
    I'll return whatever instigators initiate that's directed towards me,
    but generally I make statements or ask questions without hostility.

    On the other hand, most of your posts are unprovoked attacks.

    Review your posting history, it's filled with vile name-calling and hatred.

    Like I pointed out earlier, you returned from a 21-month hiatus
    and began posting unprovoked insults towards other members
    within the first 5 days back.

    Nobody comes close to posting as much worthless filth as you do.
    Last edited by coach belly; 04-06-2021 at 04:49 PM.

  14. #6694
    ^^^^^ No contest who the winner of hostility is. Its like asking someone who's a better poster Monet vs Tasha........gee I wonder. LANDSLIDE

  15. #6695
    Perhaps, but only on a limited basis as to limited posters and issues.

    I swear, as do others: Crimm is as bad or worse, for example.

    Many of my posts are "happy" and actually gambling related, whereas you seem to always post under a dark cloud.

    Review your posting history, it could be an eye opener: you are way too disputatious, stirring the pot just to stir it.
    Last edited by MisterV; 04-06-2021 at 04:54 PM.
    What, Me Worry?

  16. #6696
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    you are way too disputatious, stirring the pot just to stir it.
    Many members here are argumentative.

    I'm among the few that advocate for the minority viewpoint,
    so my arguments may be viewed as disputatious.

    But the discussions only become heated due to the hostility
    of those who will not respectfully consider minority viewpoints,
    those who advocate that the minority should be insulted.

    You are among those who do that.
    You're hostile, you initiate hostility.

    Your hostility gave rise to this discussion.

    Go review your posts just for this month,
    you'll recognize your own hatred within your words.

  17. #6697
    Hatred?

    Pshaw.

    Dislike, yes; hatred, no.

    To hate I'd have to take someone or something here seriously and I do not.
    What, Me Worry?

  18. #6698
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Hatred?

    Dislike, yes; hatred, no.
    OK...we get it...you dislike cancer.

    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    his purpose is to tarnish and hopefully destroy these forums:
    that's what these rejected, loveless trolls want, given their
    lack of meaning, importance, and connection to the real world.

    Just pull the plug ... free yourself from this cancer.

  19. #6699
    I hate cancer.

    I dislike DoofDawg, whom I compared to a cancer.

    I don't hate the guy, he's just words on a screen to me.

    Ridiculous words, but still just words.
    What, Me Worry?

  20. #6700
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    I hate cancer.
    I dislike DoofDawg, whom I compared to a cancer.
    You didn't compare him to a cancer, you called him cancer.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 96 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 96 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Genealogy Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 04-27-2018, 06:29 AM
  2. Closed Thread
    By coach belly in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-30-2017, 08:29 PM
  3. Sportsbetting ONLY thread
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM
  4. A thread for losses.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-26-2014, 02:01 AM
  5. The Kicker Thread
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 02:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •