Originally Posted by
kewlJ
You don't have to prove anything. I am not doubting you. I am saying what you described is very, very rare. No offense (<-lol), but it sounds like a local type place, dealing with a local player, small stakes, you may or may not have been friendly with management and they said "what the hell, he isn't costing us anything". That is very, very different from how Las Vegas casinos handle things and especially higher end players. They bar these players for a reason, because it has been determined they are a threat and the player doesn't talk them out of it.
Very, very different. Night and day. But you saying it can happen provides credibility for Mdawg and his minions. In this case when someone that knows how things work, says that is not the way it works, about this particular part of Mdawgs "fable", coach belly has already come back twice with, "mission says it happens".
I think that what you have said is precisely correct. I only took umbrage with the word, "Never," used without qualification. I tend to be very precise when I make claims, but I understand that other people aren't the same way. You wouldn't believe some of the minute points that I've been called out on---though I always try to speak with precision as it is.
Given that you know where I live, of course it was a local place dealing with a local player. I'm definitely a small stakes guy. They almost certainly looked at it and said, "He's not actually hurting us." I mean, they got hurt on the play that led to my 86'ing...that's for damn sure! But, just my individual play, right.
It probably helped that the casino is under different ownership now, of course, that didn't help when I was in Magistrate Court getting found guilty on defiant trespass charges. That judge was an asshole, though. He wouldn't even let me cite the code, kept telling me to shut up, so I couldn't even present a defense. How can the owners have possibly banned me when they don't own the place anymore and I am specifically welcome at all properties with the new ownership?
Anyway, if I see something said that is factually wrong, then my natural tendency is to correct it regardless of the context. I wasn't specifically taking a side on that one.