RS, I can see by your post....short but I believe sincere in your concern, that I am not the only one that wonders if Alan isn't experiencing some sort of mental crisis or breakdown. Maybe, but hopefully not...some sort of stroke, or dementia kicking into high gear or something.Originally Posted by RS__
U ok?Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Oh shut up LarryS. Nobody cares. Nobody gives a shit about you or what you think. You are totally irrelevant. Just another mental patient sitting in the corner in his soiled diaper mumbling incoherently to himself, reminiscing about the good old days... of washing balls for a living.Originally Posted by LarryS
AlanOriginally Posted by Alan MendelsonShow the math. Include the $8500 loss. Ready? Go.Originally Posted by Prozema
The point is IT HAS NEVER BEEN EXPLAINED. NEVER. I WANT TO SEE IT. I HAVE SEEN COMMENTS ABOUT HATE, COMMENTS ABOUT HITLER, NAZIS, BEING A SHYSTER, BUT KEWLJ HAS NEVER EXPLAINED HOW HE COMES OUT AHEAD AFTER AN $8500 LOSS.
I was wondering and I ask this seriously. There have been books and at least one movie based o a true story about people using math principles to take down big cashes at casinos.I think maybe from M.I.T.
So am I to assume you think thats all false. A fable . And if THAT is true.....then you know its possible, and you probably realize that the math is way over the head of you and me....so asking for it worthless
Its like you being prescribed an anti-rejection drug by your doctor, and you saying:I dont believe it works....please provide me the chemical formula used to produce it"
Even if he did provide that...your eyes would glaze over and you wouldnt be able to make sense of it.
And thats what would happen to you or me when presented with the math behind this stuff.
youcant expect people on this board to give you a tutorial on statistics
kewlj and the others continue to talk about kewlj's "long term" but the long term is not the issue.
The issue is and always has been, on a day when kewlj lost $8500 he called it the best day of the year.
My question has always been how is losing $8500 of real money the best day of the year?
Kewlj still hasn't answered it. Prozema hasn't answered it. Redietz hasn't answered it.
Come on guys he LOST $8500. Do that math please.
I have had days when I lost $8500 and I also had days when I won $100,000 or more. I would never call a day when I lost $8500 a good day and I certainly wouldn't call it the best day of the year even if I had been playing a +EV video poker game.
kewlj I am going to ask you one more time: explain how losing $8500 on one day makes that day the best day of the year which is what you claimed on this site.
I'm not wasting my breath anymore. I honestly don't give a fuck if you get it or not Alan.
Alan, you are exhibiting very clear signs of dementia/alzheimers. I am not joking or trying to insult you when I say this. You repeatedly ask the question. I answer. Others answer. And you come back with the exact same question. It isn't just me that sees this. Several people have the same concern. I wish you well Alan.
Give it up, Alan. Let this forum die. The hardcore AP people drain and suck the life out of any normal community. That is a given. The reason that had to throw most of them out from the Wizard's. Dan made his choice to run this place the same way the guy is at www.GamblingForums.com . Into the ground. You can't fight it at both ends. Nothing good lasts forever, except the lives we might make for ourselves. Stop feeding the "psychos". At some point, it must be cruel to do so.
Adios. Thanks. Enjoy your life.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Aw, I envy some their certainty and arrogance. I read Sherwood Anderson's "Winesburg, Ohio" when I was 15, and came to realize "normal communities" might be very rare things. I've yet to discover one.
Now that may be because I don't where to look. Or it might be because I don't know how to define one.
But at least I know that.
Last edited by redietz; 06-05-2018 at 04:29 PM.
High, Mr. V.Originally Posted by KeystoneIt always makes my day when little fairy bitches like Mrv and Alan start cursing like some tough kick ass brawlers....lolololololololololololol....more pleaseOriginally Posted by Alan MendelsonDear piece of shit: you still haven't explained how losing at your +EV game gives you some advantage. Frankly you can't. Fuck off asshole.Originally Posted by kewlJ
This is just not that complicated. This is supposedly a gambling forum. Hense the name Vegas Casino Talk.
So you have a player, who has supported himself...now for 15 years from mostly blackjack play (and a bit of other AP activity). Winnings of over $920,000 from blackjack, well of a million dollars overall. And he (I) shares some of his experiences, techniques and wisdom of how he plays. None of which is unique to him....all came from successful and smarter players before him.
And then you have a guy, a shyster, a snake oil salesman (for a living), challenging everything the player using proven techniques says. EVERYTHING! The shyster pretends he doesn't understand because he doesn't want to understand. So he ignores the facts, and twists and manipulates everything else. He SHYSTERS!
So I ask....as I always do. Who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking? The player who has earned over a million dollars from casinos, $920,000 from blackjack? Or the shyster, the dishonest salesman, who has been laughed off every gambling forum because he refuses to acknowledge that he didn't see lightning strike 18 times in a row?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Alan, you are intentionally misrepresenting what KJ said. He said it was his BEST DAY FOR EV. See if you can get that thru your thick head.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
BEST DAY FOR EV
BEST DAY FOR EV
BEST DAY FOR EV
Keep repeating it until you get it. No that won't work. You are either to stupid or to intransigent. Take your pick.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Keystone is v?
No, he just wishes he were.Originally Posted by Prozema
Can't blame him, either: must suck to be him.
What, Me Worry?
No. Mr. V, blocked Keystone because he couldn't get the best of him. So I quote Keystone's posts when I see them so V has to look at them anyway. LOL!Originally Posted by Prozema
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Hilarious!Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNo. Mr. V, blocked Keystone because he couldn't get the best of him. So I quote Keystone's posts when I see them so V has to look at them anyway. LOL!Originally Posted by Prozema
Thanks for nothing, Mr. Crimm: and I mean that in the literal sense of the word.
I blocked that twit because life is too short to have to put up with hemorrhoids like him.
You think he "got the best of" me, do you?
LOL
Wanna buy a bridge?
What, Me Worry?
yet MrV is asking if people want nathan to be nuked.....in a poll.
but he does know how to block individuals it seems and it works for him.
curious, why wouldnt it work for nathan
isnt life too short to worry about nathan and if he needs to be banned?
For all you bromance lovers.
Mickeycrimm, if kewlj really meant that losing $8500 was his best day for EV, then what would be his worst day?
If you walked into a bank and asked for a mortgage and said "I lost $8500 but I'm way up on EV" do you think you'd get the mortgage?
Wait, don't answer that. You'd say yes.
More cheap shots from the peanut gallery.Originally Posted by Prozema
That's OK; I wouldn't expect some of the board members here to understand notions of altruism and empathy; for them jerking off into their hand and then eating it is an advantage play.
What, Me Worry?
Sir, I hardly know you but that is sound advice.Originally Posted by Bill Yung
There are currently 417 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 417 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
