The WoV Thread

[jbjb]

Dawg should just stay at gamblingforums. He'll get many more suckers there.

[kewlJ]

Oh ah dunno, KewlJ said things at WOV like "There is going to be no opportunity for collusion with casino personnel favorable to you. No opportunity to stage anything." meaning that he thinks it's possible to make sure you win with some kind of arrangement,

and DarkOz said things at WOV like "More to the point, changing what marketing shows in their computers is precisely a common inside job that occurs."

so - yes - there ARE supposed "professionals" out there who believe that a casino would cheat, collude and alter just to make MDawg a happy winner. Damn powerful that MDawg must be to have internet people think that he could possibly wield that sort of clout.

So here's what is funny. Not haha funny, but sad, inconsistency, bullshit funny. MDawg;s whole "fantasy" revolves around showing us all the special treatment that he receives as a high rolling LOSING player. Showing just how far the different casinos will go to make him happy (so that he continues to lose money)

So now at the suggestion that they would provide a phony statement showing phantom wins, all of the sudden MDawg is arguing they would never do such a thing because they are "professionals". There is nothing illegal about providing a phony win statement for a high roller. It's not a legal document. This wouldn't even be considered a big favor. Casinos and particularly casino hosts will do almost anything to keep big losing players happy. I once heard a casino allowed a player to get married at the craps table.

Now, while I have you here MDawg....YOU ARE A LIAR! I am allowed to say that on this forum. You can try crying to Dan Druff via PM, like you do Wizard, but it isn't going to work.

[MDawg]

You couldn't be that dense. The supposed "professionals" are YOU and DarkOz. In case you need further explication, meaning that you two are jokes (lacking even, as jdaewoo put it, a brain cell), and not professionals, to have such ridiculous thoughts.

[kewlJ]

You couldn't be that dense. The supposed "professionals" are YOU and DarkOz. In case you need further explication, meaning that you two are jokes (lacking even, as jdaewoo put it, a brain cell), and not professionals, to have such ridiculous thoughts.

"Lacking a brain cell". Wow, good comeback.

Look this really isn't personal with me. Yeah, I just called you a liar because you got me suspended with your crybaby antics for calling you a liar at WoV, when I did no such thing. I have tried to give you the benefit of doubt since I first read your claims. I repeatedly have stated "defies math, as claimed", and have repeatedly asked you if you are doing something or getting something special like a loss rebate that you aren't telling us. (Even a loss rebate wouldn't result in the winning every session that you claim though).

But like I say, it isn't personal with me. You are claiming something that defies math. The Onus is on you to explain that. You haven't, can't, and won't. Instead, like almost everyone that makes such claims, you challenge people to a wager, with unrealistic terms, that you know no one will agree to.

[MDawg]

There are different things going on here. One is that you and DarkOz apparently think that the casino would collude with me to make sure I win, or alter the stats as reported (or alter the hotel folio) to make me happy. I can't fathom anyone who is actually involved with mainline gambling or resort travel really believing such absurdity.

[kewlJ]

There are different things going on here. One is that you and DarkOz apparently think that the casino would collude with me to make sure I win, or alter the stats as reported to make me happy. I can't fathom anyone who is actually involved with mainline gambling really believing such absurdity.

No, not collude to allow you to win. THAT would be illegal. But this could be set up as a demonstration or exhibition, rather than a real gambling session and they could agree to allow you to win that "demonstration". THAT would not be illegal.

Furthermore, you could have private associations or relationship with say a dealer, that you collude with outside of the casinos knowledge to allow you win. While THIS would be illegal, it isn't out of the realm of possibility with a large sum of money bet involved.

All I want to do is make sure there is Zero possibility of any kind of rigging of a high end bet. Your reluctance to accept those kind of terms speaks volumes to me.

[MDawg]

I suppose I should be flattered that anyone would think I wield that kind of clout at the casinos.

[kewlJ]

I suppose I should be flattered that anyone would think I wield that kind of clout at the casinos.

Like I said earlier, your whole "case" is predicated on convincing everyone what clout and special treatment you do have. If you need proof, I refer you to 200+ pages of pictures of everything from high end suites, to asparagus. Now you want to flip and say, I am just an innocent guy that doesn't have that kind of clout. YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!

And by the way, you are a Lawyer, so I put nothing past you, including illegal actions of collusion.

[MDawg]

Just as you pointed out that no one with any sense would believe that the motor home parked in the dealer's lot was Singer's, no one with any sense would believe any of that collusion and conspiracy nonsense.

[Pitboss1]

Duplicate printed

[Keystone]

I suppose I should be flattered that anyone would think I wield that kind of clout at the casinos.

Like I said earlier, your whole "case" is predicated on convincing everyone what clout and special treatment you do have. If you need proof, I refer you to 200+ pages of pictures of everything from high end suites, to asparagus. Now you want to flip and say, I am just an innocent guy that doesn't have that kind of clout. YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!

And by the way, you are a Lawyer, so I put nothing past you, including illegal actions of collusion.

Seriously don`t get why some of you pay this guy(?) the attention that you do...everyone with 1/2 a brain knows that if someone was winning like this, they would do it in silence, not blabbing it out on some board where 15 people post...besides, if it makes him feel good who really gives a fuck?.....we understand Coach wants to suck him off, that`s why he gives the attention. Not sure why anyone else does

[Pitboss1]

I read this thread today. Interesting to say the least. Personally I would have to say that the OP seems legit and most of the attacks seem out of either unfamiliarity with higher limit gaming protocols or just picking a fight. The OP does not appear to be fabricating anything imo.

[The Boz]

The bigger issue is perhaps MD IS a lawyer and rich, which I believe is possible. It has been suggested he was born into money, which is also probable and never worked an honest day in his life. Explains a lot, wife fucking him (and others while he is at the tables) all the time, no responsibility in life and losing more than most make in a year on many trips to Vegas. Being treated like a king by Vegas casinos, which we all know happens all the time. It’s why they build the things, that fact never changes.

That all said I recently hit a $649,000 progressive jackpot on a $4 bet on a Buffalo Diamond at Harvey’s Tahoe. Same odds as MD being truthful in his claims. Only difference is Harrahs and Harvey’s posted it on their Facebook page.

We knew the guy would show back up here. The act is wearing thin at WoV with all his crying to Mike and threats of lawsuits. Just shows how pissed he is no one believes him.

[The Boz]

I read this thread today. Interesting to say the least. Personally I would have to say that the OP seems legit and most of the attacks seem out of either unfamiliarity with higher limit gaming protocols or just picking a fight. The OP does not appear to be fabricating anything imo.

Uh, Mickey Crimm is the OP jackass.

Just another MDawg sock and buddy. I always call The Wiz little man but it’s obvious this MDawg creation is much smaller of a man in many ways. As others has said, this has been a hoax from the start, granted an elaborate one, but still a hoax.

Only reason is why?

Come on “MDawg”, show how tough a lawyer you are and sue someone for insulting an unknown fictional character on an Internet forum. Make daddy proud for once in your life little man. Obviously he isn’t proud of the gambling degenerate you have become with his money.

[BoSox]

I read this thread today.

Wow, that's pretty good. If you don't mind how long did take you to read 6 thousand and seventy-three posts?

[Ozzy]

Quite the timing, that psychopath "Wynn" gets the boot, and new member " Pitboss" signs up. We get so many new members, signing up here on a regular basis Also Dog was very silent while " Wynn" was here, but comes back, after he gets the axe. Interesting to say the least.

[The Boz]

Quite the timing, that psychopath "Wynn" gets the boot, and new member " Pitboss" signs up. We get so many new members, signing up here on a regular basis Also Dog was very silent while " Wynn" was here, but comes back, after he gets the axe. Interesting to say the least.

Just say it, unlike Mike the Wizard who is afraid of being sued by a fictional internet character, we need to say what we think. Like him, we are all anonymous posters on an Internet forum. Like him, we can claim anything.

Unless he comes out like Alan did, we are making accusations toward a fictional person. He claims to beat the game of baccarat at will. We know he is a little dicked insecure possible male or transgender post op male making claims of beating the game and reading the cards at will.

At least Christopher Mitchell posts who he is. This guy doesn’t even have the balls to that under his own name.

[Pitboss1]

You guys are really not super friendly here. But I'll tell you I did not say I read every single post I read through the thread. I thought the high-limit baccarat player was the OP big deal, I made a mistake. I will tell you it sure looks pretty honest posting to myself and I am a seasoned floor supervisor. Far as all of the sexual talk I am at a loss for words but you guys carry on.

[Keystone]

You guys are really not super friendly here. But I'll tell you I did not say I read every single post I read through the thread. I thought the high-limit baccarat player was the OP big deal, I made a mistake. I will tell you it sure looks pretty honest posting to myself and I am a seasoned floor supervisor. Far as all of the sexual talk I am at a loss for words but you guys carry on.

Welcome Spitboss

[mickeycrimm]

I read some of that website about the Wizard of Nothing and whatever that guy did or does doesn't gibe with WynnPleasure775, who isn't asking for anything from anyone here.

You've read Wynn775's posts here. If you are defending him after what he wrote here there is something wrong with you.