The WoV Thread

[Pitboss1]

You guys are really not super friendly here. But I'll tell you I did not say I read every single post I read through the thread. I thought the high-limit baccarat player was the OP big deal, I made a mistake. I will tell you it sure looks pretty honest posting to myself and I am a seasoned floor supervisor. Far as all of the sexual talk I am at a loss for words but you guys carry on.

Welcome Spitboss

[The Boz]

You guys are really not super friendly here. But I'll tell you I did not say I read every single post I read through the thread. I thought the high-limit baccarat player was the OP big deal, I made a mistake. I will tell you it sure looks pretty honest posting to myself and I am a seasoned floor supervisor. Far as all of the sexual talk I am at a loss for words but you guys carry on.

Welcome Spitboss

Wow. Who else often posted YouTube clips as a response to comments.

Come on, you have to be smarter than this.

And let me guess, Dan will come here and say there is no match.

As always, clowns get off on fucking with this site and it’s members thinking it bothers us.

[coach belly]

What size bribe would casino staff at the Wynn accept to cheat so that the player wins,
and how many staff members would the player need to bribe?

Not a single solitary person with a brain cell suggested this.

I won't argue with you over whether or not tewlj has any brain cells...

this could be set up as a demonstration or exhibition, rather than a real gambling session and they could agree to allow you to win that "demonstration".

you could have private associations or relationship with say a dealer, that you collude with outside of the casinos knowledge to allow you win. While THIS would be illegal, it isn't out of the realm of possibility with a large sum of money bet involved.

I submit that it is out of the realm of possibility for any of the proposed bets.

How could a dealer on a H/L Bac table at Wynn allow a player to win, and not get caught?

[Darkoz]

I won't argue with you over whether or not tewlj has any brain cells...

this could be set up as a demonstration or exhibition, rather than a real gambling session and they could agree to allow you to win that "demonstration".

you could have private associations or relationship with say a dealer, that you collude with outside of the casinos knowledge to allow you win. While THIS would be illegal, it isn't out of the realm of possibility with a large sum of money bet involved.

I submit that it is out of the realm of possibility for any of the proposed bets.

How could a dealer on a H/L Bac table at Wynn allow a player to win, and not get caught?

Crime in the USA would be totally eliminated if people were concerned about getting caught.

Most criminals in prison will tell you they thought they were going to get away with their crimes

[monet]

Crime in the USA would be totally eliminated if people were concerned about getting caught.

Most criminals in prison will tell you they thought they were going to get away with their crimes

Personally, I don't know anyone in or that went to prison so I will have to take your word for it.
I'm sure you know plenty with all your criminal activity.
Thanks for the information and dropping that knowledge on us.
Now get back to wearing masks and preaching your fear about Covid while you hustle up forum members to watch you crush the Casinos.
You might even get a Free Dinner to go along with catching the Chink Chang Chong Shivers.
Get some T-Shirts printed up that say: DarkOz Challenge 2020
You might catch Corona but you will be able to follow the most feared AP on the East Coast, discuss his plays and eat take out dinner!

[Tasha]

I too, find it INTERESTING that Wynnpleasure got banned YESTERDAY and Pitboss just happens to join the VERY next day! AND claims that be read over 6,000 posts in just ONE day! It's MIND BOGGLING!

[coach belly]

Most criminals in prison will tell you they thought they were going to get away with their crimes

I was asking about the mechanics of this cheat-for-player-to-win operation at a Wynn H/L Baccarat table, that your betting syndicate imagines is possible.

What could the dealer do to allow the player to win that the supervisors wouldn't pick up on?

[Darkoz]

Crime in the USA would be totally eliminated if people were concerned about getting caught.

Most criminals in prison will tell you they thought they were going to get away with their crimes

Personally, I don't know anyone in or that went to prison so I will have to take your word for it.
I'm sure you know plenty with all your criminal activity.
Thanks for the information and dropping that knowledge on us.
Now get back to wearing masks and preaching your fear about Covid while you hustle up forum members to watch you crush the Casinos.
You might even get a Free Dinner to go along with catching the Chink Chang Chong Shivers.
Get some T-Shirts printed up that say: DarkOz Challenge 2020
You might catch Corona but you will be able to follow the most feared AP on the East Coast, discuss his plays and eat take out dinner!

Lol, I suppose some broke hick like yourself can't afford cable.

.just watch a few episodes of LOCKUP, real interviews with inmates in prison.

Of course, your unimaginable ass can't believe someone actually watches cable

[kewlJ]

I was asking about the mechanics of this cheat-for-player-to-win operation at a Wynn H/L Baccarat table, that your betting syndicate imagines is possible.

What could the dealer do to allow the player to win that the supervisors wouldn't pick up on?

Coach belly, you have zero credibility because you have now taken the supportive side of several different people that have made claims that defy math. And THAT is the standard. It isn't whether you, I or anyone believes this person or that person, including me and my claims. The first bar that has to be cleared is "is this claim possible". And to that, I am pretty certain, that even you don't really believe the claims you have supported. You just like to take the contrarian point of view as you play the instigator role that you so often play.

Now to that I shouldn't respond to this trollish statement, but I will. No one, myself included, has said there would be collusion. I would hope the casino would not go along, even if it was proposed as a demonstration rather than actual play, which would not be illegal. But and here is the part, you play dumb with, such a large wager involving a high roller type player, that casinos like to do everything they can for, opens the door for the possibility, not likelihood, but possibility of such collusion. Anyone accepting such a wager is going to want to eliminate that possibility. So stop turning it into more than that.

Anyway, looks like this whole MDawg fiction "adventures of Huckleberry Finn", I mean MDawg has played itself out as Wizard now wants proof for this charade to continue.

[coach belly]

you have now taken the supportive side of several different people that have made claims that defy math.

Quote the claims that MDawg has made that defy math, and produce the math that prove the claims impossible.

If you're wrong, I will explain to you why you are wrong, not in support of MDawg, but to reveal the fallacy of your claim...not his.

No one, myself included, has said there would be collusion.

You have implied that casino personnel could or might collude with MDawg and cheat for him to win. That's the reason why you insist on picking the casino.

It's ridiculous to think that a casino would cheat for a player to win at Bac. How would they cheat? What could the mechanics of the cheating be, especially with witnesses right there wagering that MDawg will lose?

And, you are clueless if you even consider the possibility that MDawg would risk his own money playing high-limit Baccarat at a casino not of his choosing.

It's mind-boggling how idiotic that thinking is.

As daewoo pointed out, before he knew what you wrote on WOV...you're an imbecile...a low IQ pinhead with no brain cells.

[BoSox]

No one, myself included, has said there would be collusion.

Coach belly wrote

"And, you are clueless if you even consider the possibility that MDawg would risk his own money playing high-limit Baccarat at a casino not of his choosing.

It's mind-boggling how idiotic that thinking is. "



Just why is it mind-boggling? The rules are exactly the same everywhere. The only difference would be in the listed minimum and maximum allowable bets.

[coach belly]

The rules are exactly the same everywhere.

I'm not sure that's true...are you sure that it is?

In any case, it's mind-boggling because it's an obvious dealbreaker, he won't agree to that condition.

The reason could be as simple as he prefers not to play at a casino that's not of his choosing.

I understand that mindset. I prefer not to even enter any premises that's not of my choosing, let alone gamble in a casino that's not of my choosing.

[mickeycrimm]

you have now taken the supportive side of several different people that have made claims that defy math.

Quote the claims that MDawg has made that defy math, and produce the math that prove the claims impossible.

If you're wrong, I will explain to you why you are wrong, not in support of MDawg, but to reveal the fallacy of your claim...not his.

No one, myself included, has said there would be collusion.

You have implied that casino personnel could or might collude with MDawg and cheat for him to win. That's the reason why you insist on picking the casino.

It's ridiculous to think that a casino would cheat for a player to win at Bac. How would they cheat? What could the mechanics of the cheating be, especially with witnesses right there wagering that MDawg will lose?

And, you are clueless if you even consider the possibility that MDawg would risk his own money playing high-limit Baccarat at a casino not of his choosing.

It's mind-boggling how idiotic that thinking is.

As daewoo pointed out, before he knew what you wrote on WOV...you're an imbecile...a low IQ pinhead with no brain cells.

Now, let's see. According to Coach:

"It's ridiculous to think that a casino would cheat...."
and....
"you are clueless if you even consider the possibility that MDawg would risk his own money in a casino not of his choosing?"

Yep, according to Coach, casinos don't cheat....but MDawg doesn't want to risk his money in the wrong casino because they might cheat. Makes sense.

[BoSox]

The rules are exactly the same everywhere.

In any case, it's mind-boggling because it's an obvious dealbreaker, he won't agree to that condition.

The reason could be as simple as he prefers not to play at a casino that's not of his choosing.

I understand that mindset. I prefer not to even enter any premises that's not of my choosing, let alone gamble in a casino that's not of my choosing.

MDawg, should never be able to choose the casino, as he already has a huge advantage already "LOL" namely inside knowledge of "what he is up to" that no one else is privy to. Especially, if he is willing to make a bet for 50K. If he is in fact legit "LOL" and has some unknown real AP skill that will deliver him the win he should be more than willing to literally throw a dart on a board with every spot covered by different casinos listed, one minute before the bet begins, and only seen by the two bettors themselves. If the bet is for his play in more casinos than one the dart should not be re-thrown until completion of the previous casino. Both bettors based on the bet rules should travel together with chosen witnesses to the casinos all without cell phones during the bet. Lamers should be used to halt play during restroom breaks that are witnessed, seriously LOL.

[The Boz]

It’s obvious MD is backing down on his claims now and is unwilling to wager on his “abilities” or any future bets. So all this discussion is worthless as many of us said all along.

Props, yes I’m giving the Wizard props, for semi calling MDawg out and saying he doesn’t believe his claims. It’s all a few of us asked because he has always called out claims that don’t make mathematical sense.

It seems MD is down to wanting to hustle a sucker with claims, pictures and the testimony of others who have a great reason to play along withhim. Along with trying to prove something we all know, players who play negative games at the levels he claims get comped like kings. It’s casino 101, and we all get it.

Nothing much to see here, we will still get crazy claims but he doesn’t have many defenders left, others than one that will argue the sky isn’t blue and 1+1 doesn’t always equal 2.

[Ozzy]

It’s obvious MD is backing down on his claims now and is unwilling to wager on his “abilities” or any future bets. So all this discussion is worthless as many of us said all along.

Props, yes I’m giving the Wizard props, for semi calling MDawg out and saying he doesn’t believe his claims. It’s all a few of us asked because he has always called out claims that don’t make mathematical sense.

It seems MD is down to wanting to hustle a sucker with claims, pictures and the testimony of others who have a great reason to play along withhim. Along with trying to prove something we all know, players who play negative games at the levels he claims get comped like kings. It’s casino 101, and we all get it.

Nothing much to see here, we will still get crazy claims but he doesn’t have many defenders left, others than one that will argue the sky isn’t blue and 1+1 doesn’t always equal 2.

I'm very surprised, that Alan the GOAT of all forum punching bags, has been very quiet, about all of Dogs bullshit claims. You would think, he would be in there, joining in with his asinine comments. I'm afraid, he must be in severe decline, he's a shell of his former self.

[Keystone]

It’s obvious MD is backing down on his claims now and is unwilling to wager on his “abilities” or any future bets. So all this discussion is worthless as many of us said all along.

Props, yes I’m giving the Wizard props, for semi calling MDawg out and saying he doesn’t believe his claims. It’s all a few of us asked because he has always called out claims that don’t make mathematical sense.

It seems MD is down to wanting to hustle a sucker with claims, pictures and the testimony of others who have a great reason to play along withhim. Along with trying to prove something we all know, players who play negative games at the levels he claims get comped like kings. It’s casino 101, and we all get it.

Nothing much to see here, we will still get crazy claims but he doesn’t have many defenders left, others than one that will argue the sky isn’t blue and 1+1 doesn’t always equal 2.

Or ones that are hoping to get into his pants like the "Coach"

[Darkoz]

Looks like dawg being taken to the pound. Gonna put that mutt to sleep

[coach belly]

Yep, according to Coach, casinos don't cheat....but MDawg doesn't want to risk his money in the wrong casino because they might cheat.

Casinos don't cheat for the player to win, you edited that from my quote.

The challengers are claiming that the casinos might cheat,
but I missed where MDawg wrote that a casino might cheat him.

Was that on another forum?

[coach belly]

Especially, if he is willing to make a bet for 50K.

You're all mixed up...the $50K bet is that the doubters can't disprove
his reported claims from the last trip, through examination of documents
and in-person interviews with casino personnel.

The Wizard listed some documents that he wants to see,
implying that those documents are legit and acceptable proof.

If he is in fact legit "LOL" and has some unknown real AP skill

When did he claim to have AP skill?

I don't recall him ever claiming that he has a mathematical edge,
he consistently acknowledges that he's playing a -EV game.

But the fact that he's played Baccarat doesn't prove that he hasn't won.