Doxxing in the news:
Oregon has an anti-doxxing law, and I read that Washington state is also considering a bill to make doxxing a crime.
The net tightens ... Any motherfucker who doxxes me will face criminal prosecution.
Nevada also has an anti-doxxing law. so what are you waiting for, KJ?
Call the cops and file a doxxing complaint if you feel aggrieved.
Last edited by MisterV; 02-01-2022 at 04:48 PM.
What, Me Worry?
Wise up.
The rules prohibit personal insults...calling someone a liar is a personal insult, especially when it's just opinion that he's a liar.
It's evident that the hosting admin, who has met with and witnessed MDawg play, doesn't consider him to be a liar...
...so he's not inclined to permit forum members to call MDawg a liar on his forum.Originally Posted by Wizard
I suspect if proof that MDawg has been lying is presented,
then the admins will concede that MDawg is a liar,
and maybe then they'll permit name-calling and insults.
I've read that that some members claim to have proof that MDawg is lying in their possession.
Perhaps they should put up, or shut up with their insinuations and their whining about fairness.
Come, on dude. The man posted almost daily for 7 straight months accounts of his play that totaled 500k or more in winnings and then in one single line "that wizard and I have gone over my records and I am about even for this trip" those 7 months of lying claims disappeared. There is no further proof of lying necessary. That is equivalent to video of the guy standing over the body holding the murder weapon.
Last edited by kewlJ; 02-01-2022 at 05:48 PM.
Exactly what damages are there here to this Mdog person? I see a guy on the internet claiming to be an attorney and offering legal advice and council to people. His credentials to do so should be revealed.
So again, where are there any damages? The only possible damage would be to his credibility because people could then look into who he is and his claims and see they were not true. So I guess maybe his ability to continue to lie and deceive was damaged. MrV, is that a thing? a legit damage?
Now, I actually have easily documented and provable damages. However, it is not in my best interest to pursue anything like that right now. I suppose this person was counting on that fact.
Actually, ALL of my Accounts at WOV are banned and my IP Address is permanently blocked from making new Email Addresses after making excessive new Email Addresses in order to make WOV Accounts. I got a message saying something like,"This IP Address has generated an excessive amount of Email Addresses. This IP Address is permanently blocked from making new Email Addresses."
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7
Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.
Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.
Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!
KJ, I believe that your claim for damages far exceeds his, were he to bring one.
You rely on anonymity to make a living; douchedawg personifies the schmucky lawyer who brays "There's no such thing as bad publicity."
What, Me Worry?
Tasha, not trying to be mean to you, but nobody cares that WoV FINALLY blocked your ability to make new accounts. THAT should have been done years ago. And they haven't really blocked that ability anyway. Just at the lowest most elementary level. Everyone understands this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I would like to get back to the proposal I made earlier today. I know coach belly wants to hijack and deflect and take us down an unrelated rabbit hole, but I am going to keep coming back to this:
After a year of these claims by Mdog of winning that defy math and claims of living in a high end comped suite for a solid year, I think it is time to get to the bottom of this once and for all. Wizard did several interviews with Singer attempting to get to the bottom, I don't see why this should be any different. Unfortunately, Wizard's protecting this Mdog and his claims for the last year and his own admission that he signed an agreement to not voice his opinion have disqualified him from that role.
But there are others qualified to do so. I mentioned Munchkin earlier and an interview on GWAE. Munchkin would definitely ask the right questions. I am sure Richard knows of the situation and claims, maybe not followed along every step, but he knows the general situation.
But there are still other possibilities. Dan Druff does some sort of podcast doesn't he? I am sure it is on the topic of poker, but being an AP that understands the math, he could do an interview with Mdog and ask the necessary questions.
Next possibility, Eliot Jacobson. Eliot has done video power points on this very subject. I am a little concerned Eliot wouldn't want to get into the questioning of someone, the confrontational aspect though.
Another possibility would be James Grosjean. James certainly would ask the right questions. James has a blog that almost every legit AP reads, perhaps he could tie an interview into his blog. James may want it to be an audio only interview understandably.
There are a number of possibilities of legitimate AP's and Gambling math experts that could ask the questions necessary to finally, after a year, get to the bottom of this situation of claims that defy the gambling mathematics. Isn't it time for something like this?
Mdog you are welcome to have some input and say as to what you would require from such an interview. And a NDA of the person questioning is off the table.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7
Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.
Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.
Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!
Top interviewers to question Michel would be in order 1- Druff 2- James Bigjohn 3-Little Munchkin 4-Jacobsen....Last but not least one of the biggest forum legends of all time and biggest punching bag, the one and only Alan "Andrew" "Mendelbread" Mendelson
No to Alan. He lacks the gambling math expertise, IMO. 18 y.o in row.... enough said. I am not aware of any expertise or even much knowledge about Alan and baccarat. I guess if Alan wanted to act as host or moderator or something, but there would have to be someone of gambling math expertise and baccarat knowledge and expertise involved.
I like the idea of Munchkin and GWAE, but would welcome Dan Druff in this role.
I am not looking for a battle royale. That is your kind of thing. I want to fairly get to the bottom of claims that defy math and reality that have been repeated almost daily for a solid year now. I welcome Mdogs input so as to try to make this as fair as possible.
Shackleford should have been the ideal candidate as he has played this role before, most recently with Rob Singer. It was over a year ago that Shackleford said "it was time for Mdawg to put up or shut up", meaning time to get to the bottom of this. Unfortunately, Shackleford disqualified himself by agreeing to a NDA (and possibly money changing hands as part of that), that guaranteed he would NOT get to the bottom of this.
So I just want to go back to the original premise, with someone else that is qualified that hasn't disqualified themselves and finally get to the bottom of this.
I will tell you what would be a good interview for Alan to do, would be to interview a top strip casino executive and find out just what it would take, what kind and level of play it would take for a player to be comped a high-end suite for a solid year. And whether it would make any difference if that player won hundreds of thousands of dollars over that year rather than losing the required amounts.
I may have a better idea, since a casino exec might balk at spilling any "proprietary information."Originally Posted by kewlJ
Have you read Steve Cyr's "Whale Hunt in the Desert?"
He's still in Las Vegas, but he's an independent, specializing in the care, feeding, and harpooning of whales, such as douchedawg claims to be.
Drop Cyr a line, see if he'll help ...https://www.facebook.com/steve.cyr.1...=browse_search
What, Me Worry?
Steve Cyr is a cold hearted Jerk. He helped cause the Suicide of Multiple Whales and he'd be like,"Tommy drove off a cliff on purpose and died after losing his entire Family's Inheritance by Gambling. Oh well. This is just business and Tommy was an Adult who didn't have to lose his entire Family's Inheritance by Gambling. No skin off my nose," was seriously Steve's demeanor when speaking about his Whales' Suicides when he helped cause their Suicides. So damn cold hearted and sad.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7
Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.
Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.
Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!
There are currently 91 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 91 guests)