I found this video of Rob and Alan.
At about the 1 minute mark, Rob started talking about video poker games not being random.
If that belief is still true, I don't see the point in arguing.... You either believe you are playing a fair game and side with the math people (i.e. MC) or you believe it's not random and you side with... I'm not even sure what to call it... (I.e. Rob).
If there is not alignment on whether the deal and draw are random, there is no basis for a conversation. All you have left at best is a debate or a argument on whether games are or are not random. Am I right?
I want to assume it is a debate and the goal is to influence the audience on who is right and who is wrong. I know what I think...
Or maybe this is just an argument where the goal is nothing more than to hurt or diminish the other person?
The most baffeling thing here is both people claim to be making a mint... Defense and prosecuting attorneys both join the same country clubs and doctors and business men. Each one of them had different paths to success... But somehow, gambling is different I guess.