Page 13 of 17 FirstFirst ... 391011121314151617 LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 328

Thread: Rob Singer sightings...

  1. #241
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Coach is seeking those who will support your sports betting accomplishments
    I'd like him to post anything that supports his sports betting claims.

    He hasn't done that...he expects me to search for the info.

    That's too much work, I'm not investigating him, it would be quicker and easier if he just posted the stuff here.

    But he won't. So how is this different than Singer refusing to send his info?

    How are the ditz's CFO & VP different than Singer's mathematicians?
    You will never get a straight answer from redietz and unfortunately Rob is also lacking in straight answers.

    Actually the only one who has made sense is kewlj who said something like why bother to tell the truth on an anonymous message board.

    As I said in a post to mickeycrimm this forum should be retitled Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves. LOL

    I can't take anything here seriously anymore and neither should you.

  2. #242
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Coach is seeking those who will support your sports betting accomplishments
    I'd like him to post anything that supports his sports betting claims.

    He hasn't done that...he expects me to search for the info.

    That's too much work, I'm not investigating him, it would be quicker and easier if he just posted the stuff here.

    But he won't. So how is this different than Singer refusing to send his info?

    How are the ditz's CFO & VP different than Singer's mathematicians?
    You will never get a straight answer from redietz and unfortunately Rob is also lacking in straight answers.

    Actually the only one who has made sense is kewlj who said something like why bother to tell the truth on an anonymous message board.

    As I said in a post to mickeycrimm this forum should be retitled Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves. LOL

    I can't take anything here seriously anymore and neither should you.
    Nor should any of us take you seriously. You said you were gone from here, obviously didn’t stay that way. While you won’t admit it, your show hurts your credibility as a reporter. And the Yo’s, even if you still believe you saw it, nothing more needs said.

    But maybe that is your point, you are just like how you see everyone else.

  3. #243
    The Boz let me give you a simple and straight answer: I've been in the TV and radio advertising business since October 2006.

    Quite honestly I'm proud not to be part of the news business now. You call that shlock "news"?

  4. #244
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    The Boz let me give you a simple and straight answer: I've been in the TV and radio advertising business since October 2006.

    Quite honestly I'm proud not to be part of the news business now. You call that shlock "news"?
    There is no more “news”. It’s now all ideological war fare.

  5. #245
    That seems true with the major internet purveyors, Fox and CNN, but the news seems to be less slanted with the big 3 traditional outlets: NBC, CBS and ABC.
    What, Me Worry?

  6. #246
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    That seems true with the major internet purveyors, Fox and CNN, but the news seems to be less slanted with the big 3 traditional outlets: NBC, CBS and ABC.
    Really?

  7. #247
    Originally Posted by dannyj View Post
    the illegal practice of trading on the stock exchange to one's own advantage through having access to confidential information.
    Exactly Danny. Another great example is when cooking magnate Martha Stewart did this by dumping her pharmaceutical shares so that she would profit while bankrupting a large number of other people. I think she now has a very successful cooking show with Snoop Dogg, whereas someone who is not above the law would be rotting in prison.

  8. #248
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    That seems true with the major internet purveyors, Fox and CNN, but the news seems to be less slanted with the big 3 traditional outlets: NBC, CBS and ABC.


    Last edited by tableplay; 04-05-2018 at 07:03 PM.

  9. #249
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post

    But if I do that, then you'll owe me a favor, and I don't trust you not to welsh.
    Do you mean welsh like your lover rob?
    I don't know Rob Singer, but my recollection of the exercise was that Singer did not welsh.

    Acrid certainly had the opportunity to meet Singer's conditions and corner him, but he outright refused to meet the terms of the bet, and the chance to corner Singer was lost.
    That was Singerwelsher's lying cover story for welshing the bet.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  10. #250
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    It's hard to be a loser at VP after hitting three $100k royals. (Yes, it's now three.)
    You'll find a way.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  11. #251
    Originally Posted by dannyj View Post
    the illegal practice of trading on the stock exchange to one's own advantage through having access to confidential information.
    You have to be in Congress to get away with it.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  12. #252
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    So that I know what I'm looking for, can you please provide an example of a fail point, and how it would apply to Singer's systems?.
    For conventional video poker players the "fail point" would be 99.9999999% payback. They would be predicted to lose money at that percentage. But Singerwelsher refuses to say what the "fail point" is for his tactics. I personally think it's the same as the above.

    Sportsbettors with a 60% win record would have a huge edge. I think the "fail point" would be laying -151.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  13. #253
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Mickey, since your picture has been posted several times by you and everyone knows what you look like, why don't you post a picture of you holding a W2 with one of those 10K must wins after you hit it?
    We don't have must hits in Montana. I've been working out of state for about a year now. I made a quick study of the 10K must hits. They are in lots of casinos. I haven't found a playable number ($9800) yet but I'm prepared to throw down on one if I do. This is not a play one is going to find dozens of times a year. Then their is the competition factor. Some guys will throw down on them at $9700. I won't play that low. And I have seen poor schmucks get trapped on them by playing them low then getting in way more than the meter pays but they can't quit as long as they still have money. When a play goes tits on you, that is, you wind up with more money in the machine than what the meter is going to pay, the cheapest way out of it is to play until you take the meter off. You have to do that no matter what happens. The poor schmucks that play them low then get stuck big time look demoralized as they sit their playing. That's not going to happen to me.

    I do take a look at all the 10K's in a casino and I will throw down if I ever find a playable number. And I'll post the W-2G up here.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-06-2018 at 04:53 AM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  14. #254
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    So blackhole and coach belly, feel free to educate us. I'm sure you two have understandings and explanations that go far beyond the abilities of simple gambling folks like myself and mickeycrimm to grasp. But please give it a try.
    You must have me confused with an alleged AP hustler. Did you forget I'm just an uneducated idiot unloading boatloads of cash to casinos so the AP's could pick off my loses. In fact I've been thanked several times from alleged forum AP hustlers right here for my donations. Not once was I accused of ever knowing anything about hustling AP math nor would I ever say I do. The real truth is I couldn't care less about it.

    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    6) I could demonstrate six digit wins at a handful of offshores, but you'll never know if there were six digit losses at others. Only the people in my group know. And my group isn't recruiting. Blackhole, take note here. We are not recruiting.
    Please explain to me how you got six digit ($000,000.00) sums to off shore illegal online casinos to bet with without raising any banking red flags? Please explain to me how off shore illegal online casinos got you several six digit wins back to you? What was the max weekly amount they would send, and how did they send the payments?

    Another quick story I'll throw at you. In the early 2000's I was gambling and playing poker online. I had a good friend who ran a novelty shop and did western unions. I was able to call him with the info of who and where to send the W.U.'s without payment and settle up daily and or weekly. I always sent $500.00 increments. In the middle of 2006 I get a phone call from Western Unions security department. They want to know why I sent over 100k in the past year to several different people in several different countries. I knew I had one of those W.U. cards in my name I used every time for discounts. I also realized there was no denying I sent them.

    I processed quickly what was going on and said it was for gambling. I said me and a few of my friends gamble online and use my accounts to play on. I was thinking if a couple of people were involved maybe 100k wouldn't sound or look so bad. I wasn't sure where this was heading but was concerned the IRS would get called in. All they said to me was to stop and I would no longer be authorized to send Western Unions to foreign countries. I don't know if I could send any in the USA, because since that call I never sent another one. Ironically, a couple months later the congress passed the UIGEA law.

    I also had a few wins during that time playing online. They were always by checks usually from Canada, were never allowed to exceed 10k and many casinos had weekly limits much smaller than 10K, but none were ever more than 10K. These checks also took several weeks to clear my banks.

    So, please explain how you were able to move safely these 6 digit numbers back and forth to off shore online casinos.

    Also, when I say illegal online offshore casinos, I mean illegal banking transactions which of course need to take place to gamble.

    In addition, I'm certain all your withdrawals were kept under 10K, but a bunch of them would eventually lead to an STR being filed. Please share some banking tricks with us.
    Last edited by blackhole; 04-06-2018 at 05:31 AM. Reason: Add text

  15. #255
    Just to add to the above post, a couple of years ago some legal firm contacted me about a class action motion against W.U. and that western union owed me several thousand dollars. Apparently, if money you sent isn't actually claimed W.U. must hold it, but W.U. never contacted me they even had unclaimed monies. Whenever I sent money I would just call the casino with the numbers confirming I sent the money and was always credited immediately. Guess they picked it up later. Remember this is all from a decade ago.


    I signed the legal paper work and eventually received two checks. One for over 6K and one for over 3K. I hit a royal with interest lol.
    Last edited by blackhole; 04-06-2018 at 05:08 AM.

  16. #256
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Just to add to the above post, a couple of years ago some legal firm contacted me about a class action motion against W.U. and that western union owed me several thousand dollars. Apparently, if money you sent isn't actually claimed W.U. must hold it, but W.U. never contacted me they even had unclaimed monies. Whenever I sent money I would just call the casino with the numbers confirming I sent the money and was always credited immediately. Guess they picked it up later. Remember this is all from a decade ago.


    I signed the legal paper work and eventually received two checks. One for over 6K and one for over 3K. I hit a royal with interest lol.
    To make deposits at one online poker site I sent money W.U. to a name in Costa Rica. The name would be something like Francisco Diego Garcia. Each deposit had a different name to send the money to.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #257
    While I know of many big betters that use offshore accounts, I also know of several who were stiffed. So I won't use them anymore. I was giving my friend horses to play at Woodbine in Canada and the offshore refused to pay him alleging "inside info". The amounts were not anything big--but the sudden concentration of his bets on one track and the sudden wins somehow alarmed them.

    I did get him paid eventually but there really is no recourse if you're stiffed.

  18. #258
    Too bad the books in Nevada are not allowed to legally accept and pay off bets from out of state bettors via internet or telephonic communication.

    I see no reason to prohibit it.
    What, Me Worry?

  19. #259
    Originally Posted by regnis View Post
    While I know of many big betters that use offshore accounts, I also know of several who were stiffed. So I won't use them anymore. I was giving my friend horses to play at Woodbine in Canada and the offshore refused to pay him alleging "inside info". The amounts were not anything big--but the sudden concentration of his bets on one track and the sudden wins somehow alarmed them.

    I did get him paid eventually but there really is no recourse if you're stiffed.
    Regnis -- I assume all experienced horse players know this, but my friend in the NHC did not, so I'll mention it. I think some offshores may treat Woodbine in a squirrely fashion because back in the day (not sure about now) Woodbine was on a delay that few people knew about. So broadcasts were 20 seconds or so off. If bettors concentrated on Woodbine, the books would figure you were hip to the delay or sharp in general, neither of which they appreciate.

    I owe the knowledge of this to the girlfriend. I was completely ignorant.

  20. #260
    Originally Posted by dannyj View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    The Boz let me give you a simple and straight answer: I've been in the TV and radio advertising business since October 2006.

    Quite honestly I'm proud not to be part of the news business now. You call that shlock "news"?
    There is no more “news”. It’s now all ideological war fare.
    you forgot the quotes around "warfare" the CNN Democrats vs FOX Republicans feud is about as real as WWE

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •