Rob Singer sightings...

[Alan Mendelson]

Let's return to the basic question. There was an allegation that Rob Singer had no respect for the math. In truth from the very start of my interviews with Rob he always referred to the math and even admitted his special plays were at a mathematical disadvantage.

Redietz made false statements about Rob and the math.

Everything else is a side issue.

[mickeycrimm]

Mickey are you now willing to be on TV?

How much are you willing to pay? If I'm going to be spilling the beans to a mass audience I demand to be paid well.

What guarantee do you give that you will perform as expected?

Remember that $10,000 bet I tried to make with Singer? He ran for the hills. Do you think I would put $10,000 up if I wasn't guaranteed to win?

[mickeycrimm]

Fuck off, douchenozzle.

I don't post at GF, I care little as to what goes on there.

Alan left and returned to protect his buddy, who cannot post here because he is nuked.

Fair is fair.

It's Singer's fault that he was nuked. What? We're supposed to shut up because he got himself nuked? If he wasn't such a deushbag he would still be posting here.

[mickeycrimm]

Fuck off, douchenozzle.

I don't post at GF, I care little as to what goes on there.

Alan left and returned to protect his buddy, who cannot post here because he is nuked.

Fair is fair.

I wouldn't say I'm protecting Rob. Rather, I think I'm reminding everyone just what Rob has said about the math of video poker including that he follows the math of the game and plays the games with the best returns and that he acknowledges that his special plays are at a mathematical disadvantage to the conventional plays. Now I think everyone understands that and if you still don't understand that then watch the videos on my website and watch Rob say those things.

Rob does not play the best paytables possible.

[Alan Mendelson]

Let's talk about this mickeycrimm because I'm going to propose this to several of the TV stations I work with. So please answer these questions:

1. What will be your starting bankroll?
2. What game or games will you be playing?
3. How much money do you guarantee you will win?
4. How long will it take you to win that amount?

I will take your answers to the TV stations to see if there's interest in a program.

Personally, if you told me that you had a starting bankroll of $50 and could turn it into $500 within 8 hours guaranteed I think there would be high interest.

Rob on the other hand said with $55,000 he could make something like $3,000 and frankly that wouldn't excite anybody.

[redietz]

Let's return to the basic question. There was an allegation that Rob Singer had no respect for the math. In truth from the very start of my interviews with Rob he always referred to the math and even admitted his special plays were at a mathematical disadvantage.

Redietz made false statements about Rob and the math.

Everything else is a side issue.

See, for a statement to be false, it has to be false. Argentino has never reported his royals per number of hands or his four of a kinds per number of hands. In fact, he claims such statistics are unnecessary to evaluate his system(s).

So Mr. Mendelson, why don't you explain what false statements Argentino made?

How about that I am texting him?
That I keep my girlfriend away from his due to his ten inches of manhood?
That I was never married?

Shall I go on?

Argentino's math is the side issue. The main issue is his character, and your character for defending him, popularizing him, and failing to disengage from a racist, homophobic, ranting, slandering quack.

That is the main issue. You should be ashamed. Anyone who interacts with you should be ashamed. Anyone involved with you from a business perspective needs to be informed of your associations.

[Alan Mendelson]

Fuck off, douchenozzle.

I don't post at GF, I care little as to what goes on there.

Alan left and returned to protect his buddy, who cannot post here because he is nuked.

Fair is fair.

I wouldn't say I'm protecting Rob. Rather, I think I'm reminding everyone just what Rob has said about the math of video poker including that he follows the math of the game and plays the games with the best returns and that he acknowledges that his special plays are at a mathematical disadvantage to the conventional plays. Now I think everyone understands that and if you still don't understand that then watch the videos on my website and watch Rob say those things.

Rob does not play the best paytables possible.

Sorry, but in my interviews he said he plays the best pay tables available.

Perhaps you're confused with his other statement that he can win on lesser paytables?

Singer says his primary game is 8/5 Bonus.

[Alan Mendelson]

Let's return to the basic question. There was an allegation that Rob Singer had no respect for the math. In truth from the very start of my interviews with Rob he always referred to the math and even admitted his special plays were at a mathematical disadvantage.

Redietz made false statements about Rob and the math.

Everything else is a side issue.

See, for a statement to be false, it has to be false. Argentino has never reported his royals per number of hands or his four of a kinds per number of hands. In fact, he claims such statistics are unnecessary to evaluate his system(s).

So Mr. Mendelson, why don't you explain what false statements Argentino made?

How about that I am texting him?
That I keep my girlfriend away from his due to his ten inches of manhood?
That I was never married?

Shall I go on?

Argentino's math is the side issue. The main issue is his character, and your character for defending him, popularizing him, and failing to disengage from a racist, homophobic, ranting, slandering quack.

That is the main issue. You should be ashamed. Anyone who interacts with you should be ashamed. Anyone involved with you from a business perspective needs to be informed of your associations.

I don't recall Dancer or Grochowski reporting their royals per number of hands either.

[mickeycrimm]

I wouldn't say I'm protecting Rob. Rather, I think I'm reminding everyone just what Rob has said about the math of video poker including that he follows the math of the game and plays the games with the best returns and that he acknowledges that his special plays are at a mathematical disadvantage to the conventional plays. Now I think everyone understands that and if you still don't understand that then watch the videos on my website and watch Rob say those things.

Rob does not play the best paytables possible.

Sorry, but in my interviews he said he plays the best pay tables available.

Perhaps you're confused with his other statement that he can win on lesser paytables?

Singer says his primary game is 8/5 Bonus.

8/5 Bonus is a 99.17% game. Nowhere close to the best payscales in video poker.

[jbjb]

Actually, if you can find the 35/8/5 BP where all quads pay 175, that's a 99.6613% game.

[regnis]

Seems like Rob Singer should be the one to respond to this. I don't recall him invoking the 5th. Let's hear his testimony.

Dan???

[Alan Mendelson]

Seems like Rob Singer should be the one to respond to this. I don't recall him invoking the 5th. Let's hear his testimony.

Dan???

Dan won't reinstate Singer. That leaves redietz to attack me, as if I'm Singer and I'm responsible for everything Singer has said.

[kewlJ]

as if I'm Singer and I'm responsible for everything Singer has said.

No, no no! You don't get to say this. Your actions of not only defending but enabling Singer's "alternative reality" nonsense, both as this forums owner and later as a participant means you have forfeited that right. And your own admission that you returned from "retirement" JUST to defend Singer, only confirms that you still adhere to this agenda.

You simple don't get to stand there and cry that you are innocent of robbing the bank, while the dye from the exploding dye pack is still on your hands.

[Alan Mendelson]

I returned from "retirement" to set the record straight. All along Singer has been concerned with and followed the math of video poker. The other statements about Singer ignoring the math were lies.

[redietz]

I guess today's question is whether assembling Mr. Mendelson's own words, putting them in columns parallel to Argentino's postings, and distributing them to those who have contact with Mr. Mendelson and his family is "attacking" someone.

Seems like a stretch to use someone's own words as an "attack." No editorializing, no interpretations, and no additions are even necessary. Just letting people know who associates with whom. Seems like a public service to me.

[redietz]

I returned from "retirement" to set the record straight. All along Singer has been concerned with and followed the math of video poker. The other statements about Singer ignoring the math were lies.

Incorrect. I have asked Rob many times what the fail points of his systems are. Is it 98% return vp, 95%, 94%, 80%? When do the systems fail? Rob says there is no fail point. That is completely ignoring the math. Not reporting one's own statistical results is also ignoring the math.

I'd say "good try, Mr. Mendelson," but actually your apologetics are pretty pathetic.

[Barney]

This is Barney,

I greatly appreciate strategies of both the Singer and the Mickey. The Singer strategies have been hit and misses but the LID has made much monies to help me obtain the bestest casino dates. The Mickey slut machine devices strategy is much more consistent and provides free monies for gas and buffets. Both of these young gentleman should be applauded for sharing their most greatest wisdom.


Thank you very much

[Alan Mendelson]

I returned from "retirement" to set the record straight. All along Singer has been concerned with and followed the math of video poker. The other statements about Singer ignoring the math were lies.

Incorrect. I have asked Rob many times what the fail points of his systems are. Is it 98% return vp, 95%, 94%, 80%? When do the systems fail? Rob says there is no fail point. That is completely ignoring the math. Not reporting one's own statistical results is also ignoring the math.

I'd say "good try, Mr. Mendelson," but actually your apologetics are pretty pathetic.

Rob has said he can win on any pay table. Why? Because of his money management -- not the pay table.

While you are fixated on paytables, Rob counts credits and heads for the exit.

[jbjb]

And it's been said millions of times before, money management can't win against a house edge. If you want to be delusional and believe him, go for it. We need the suckers in casinos!

[Alan Mendelson]

And it's been said millions of times before, money management can't win against a house edge. If you want to be delusional and believe him, go for it. We need the suckers in casinos!

Since I've never had a profitable year gambling shouldn't you be arguing this with Singer? I can only repeat what he told me in my interviews with him.