Page 5 of 17 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 328

Thread: Rob Singer sightings...

  1. #81
    Originally Posted by Barney View Post
    This is Barney,

    I greatly appreciate strategies of both the Singer and the Mickey. The Singer strategies have been hit and misses but the LID has made much monies to help me obtain the bestest casino dates. The Mickey slut machine devices strategy is much more consistent and provides free monies for gas and buffets. Both of these young gentleman should be applauded for sharing their most greatest wisdom.


    Thank you very much
    See Mendelson, THIS is what you have tied yourself to, through your association, and support of a con man / nut job. You must be very proud.

  2. #82
    Kewlj, why don't you call Rob Singer a con man and a nut job to his face?

  3. #83
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Kewlj, why don't you call Rob Singer a con man and a nut job to his face?
    Good lord, what the fuck is the matter with you Mendelson?

  4. #84
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    For those following along with this drama, you can flip over to GF to see this Rob Singer person respond. But note his response will not include anything concrete that disputes anything I have said, but rather, personal attacks against my sexuality or god knows what. Nothing concrete, because there is nothing concrete. His whole thing is an alternative fantasy world.
    Oh, and by the way don’t forget everything you say is a matter of concrete fact.

    The concrete proof you have is your endless bullshit that you print of how you and your pals are killing the dumb casino operators counting cards in Las Vegas for what now, ten years straight? Even when you lose 10K playing BJ, the math says you really won 6K. Sad part is you don’t even realize how stupid you sound, then still try to convince everyone else their the idiot.

    The only people your fooling are newbies. You certainly can’t pull your nonsense on veterans. Card Counting Black-Jack for a living today in Las Vegas. Are you fucking kidding me? It must have been the advantage game changes they made for the players over the past years.

    I don’t think you’re like all the other hustling AP’s on this site, you’re just a fool crying for some type of attention. Your past postings and endless crying like a bitch confirms that diagnosis, and I’m not even a doctor.

    You know things can’t be right when your upset about being banned from an idiot like Mike and carry on about it like a bitch still today.

    I’m going to plead to Dan for your banning, on the grounds of you whining like a bitch with mans genitalia.

  5. #85
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    You appear to be supporting the rambling lies of a racist, homophobic, martingale quack. You seek to make him credible, as if your association with him isn't going to follow you, your former business, and your son.

    It's a brave new world, Mr. Mendelson. Your business and your family are entwined with Mr. Argentino and everything he says and does. It's just a matter of publicizing that to the correct people.
    No. I'm pointing out what Rob Singer told me in the interviews. I suggest you read again what was written starting with the very first paragraph explaining what my purpose was.
    What you state as a purpose is irrelevant. People state purposes all of the time. Stating a purpose doesn't relieve anyone of responsibility for consequences. What matters are the consequences of your support for a ranting, racist, homophobic martingale quack who slanders people on a regular basis.

    Your taping of him, your support of him, your friendship of him reflects on you, your business, and whoever currently runs your former business. You are associated with him. You have propped him up repeatedly, and you are largely responsible for any credibility he currently has.

    People should know these things about you, your family, and your business. And they will.
    Not cool redietz. Your fight is with Rob.

  6. #86
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickey are you now willing to be on TV?
    How much are you willing to pay? If I'm going to be spilling the beans to a mass audience I demand to be paid well.
    What guarantee do you give that you will perform as expected?
    Probably the gayest thing ever said.

  7. #87
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    How much are you willing to pay? If I'm going to be spilling the beans to a mass audience I demand to be paid well.
    What guarantee do you give that you will perform as expected?


    Remember that $10,000 bet I tried to make with Singer? He ran for the hills. Do you think I would put $10,000 up if I wasn't guaranteed to win?
    Sure you would, as would most of us if we had a decent advantage, even without a guarantee. And you have a bankroll more than most of us. You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.

  8. #88
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I returned from "retirement" to set the record straight. All along Singer has been concerned with and followed the math of video poker. The other statements about Singer ignoring the math were lies.
    Why anyone would defend the loser POS is beyond me, but let’s face it, anyone who has watched your show would understand. You were a legitimate reporter years ago, no doubt, but now you will take the cash and push almost any business using your old credibility.
    Add the fact that you are concerned about Singer shows there is more to this relationship than meets the eye.

    Who had the under 6 months on Alan coming back?

  9. #89
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Kewlj, why don't you call Rob Singer a con man and a nut job to his face?
    I never want to meet Singer because if I do he'll get beat half to death and I'll wind up in jail.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  10. #90
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Let's talk about this mickeycrimm because I'm going to propose this to several of the TV stations I work with. So please answer these questions:

    1. What will be your starting bankroll?
    2. What game or games will you be playing?
    3. How much money do you guarantee you will win?
    4. How long will it take you to win that amount?

    I will take your answers to the TV stations to see if there's interest in a program.

    Personally, if you told me that you had a starting bankroll of $50 and could turn it into $500 within 8 hours guaranteed I think there would be high interest.

    Rob on the other hand said with $55,000 he could make something like $3,000 and frankly that wouldn't excite anybody.
    A $2000 bankroll. I don't know what game or games I will be playing. It depends on what's showing advantage on the particular day. I'll turn the $2000 into $2500 in a sixteen hour window. It won't take that long but I don't want to put any pressure on myself.

    Now here is a bit of advice, Alan. Do you know how easy it is to set things up where you or anyone else see's me win $500 a day? Everyday? I have no chance to lose because you and your film crew are all suckers. I'll set you assholes up. And you and your crew won't figure things out until after it's over with and I have your money pocketed. Send that to the TV producers.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  11. #91
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Now here is a bit of advice, Alan. Do you know how easy it is to set things up where you or anyone else see's me win $500 a day? Everyday? I have no chance to lose because you and your film crew are all suckers. I'll set you assholes up. And you and your crew won't figure things out until after it's over with and I have your money pocketed. Send that to the TV producers.
    Huh?

    Does not compute.
    What, Me Worry?

  12. #92
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Sure you would, as would most of us if we had a decent advantage, even without a guarantee. And you have a bankroll more than most of us. You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.
    With Singer involved failure is not an option. There is no way I would give him the chance to gloat over me getting beat.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  13. #93
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Now here is a bit of advice, Alan. Do you know how easy it is to set things up where you or anyone else see's me win $500 a day? Everyday? I have no chance to lose because you and your film crew are all suckers. I'll set you assholes up. And you and your crew won't figure things out until after it's over with and I have your money pocketed. Send that to the TV producers.
    Huh?

    Does not compute.
    V, I'm an advantage player on machines. I know how those advantages get created. Put up some money and I will produce a $500 win in short order right in front of your eyes. I'll even tell you how I did it. That is, after I fleece you first.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  14. #94
    Obviously there will be no TV show with mickeycrimm.

  15. #95
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Obviously there will be no TV show with mickeycrimm.
    Good, I'm glad that's settled. I don't want to be on a damn TV show anyway. But anyways, I'll give you guys a clue on how easy it is to set up a win. There are several ways. But I think the one that is most funny to me. I'm LMAO thinking about you guys standing there watching me and YOUR money on the line. I simply make a deal with an agent to create multipliers for me on Ultimate X. Just two machines needed. He creates multipliers on several games then cashes out. I slip in the seat and clean the multipliers up. He creates multipliers on several games on the machine beside it then cashes out, then I clean up those multipliers. And we go back and forth until I have produced the $500 earn.

    Alan, I've exposed the hustle to you but it would have been funny, funny, funny as hell watching your jaw drop while I pulled that shit on you.

    It doesn't matter I've exposed this one way to do it. I have others. So long sucker. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  16. #96
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    This was enough to bring me out of forum retirement. Some of you have taken some cheap shots at Rob knowing he can't respond.

    I'm not going to defend everything about Rob's claims and I can't because I'm his biggest critic over his tax manipulations.

    But I have to make this clear: Rob follows the math of video poker, and makes adjustments to conventional strategy in an attempt to get lucky.

    Redietz: Rob would tell you the same thing Dancer or Grochowski would tell you about the chances of getting a royal or quads. Rob even spelled it all out in my videos with him on www.alanbestbuys.com with the math. But Rob will sometimes drop a full house to draw for quads hoping to get lucky. And sometimes he will drop trips hoping to get lucky and hit a royal.

    Rob never claimed to beat a negative expectation gsme, but he did say that with some luck you can have some big winning hands that will let you walk out as a winner.

    You can twist and turn his comments all you want to but that's the truth about the Rob Singer system. It's that simple.
    How can you say that Singer has a basis in math when you yourself say he is doing a fair amount of "hoping". He sometimes uses math and sometimes breaks from the math and "hopes for good luck". What total crap that is. Casinos thrive on gamblers who " try to get lucky"...whether its throwing a 100 dollar chip on the horn or going for a bigger hand on poker like you explained. Those are suckers. The ones dealing with :hope" and "luck". Those are your words. I contend that no gambler is successful in the long run depending on luck and hope. You need something more concrete to hang your hat on.

    The first time I played BJ when resorts international opened in AC late 70's...I didnt know what the fuck I was doing and I split any 10 value card...to the groans of the table as I did it. I turned 100 into 300 in 45 min doing that. It was all hope and luck. I didnt play based on the reality of the math. Call it beginners luck. Call it good fortune. Whatever the fuck you want.....but I learned real fast I couldnt sustain that in the long run.

    And if Singer plays with some math and other times tosses it our the window,,,,,he is just as proficient as I was when I played on BJ with great "hope" and in search of "luck"

  17. #97
    LarryS I suggest you watch the videos with Singer. The information is there about what he does. But to summarize: Rob Singer follows the math of video poker the same way Dancer and Grochowski and all the APs do. But that gets lost in everything else he says.

    Ya know, 10% of what Rob says is good info and 90% is flack. You're all caught up on the flack.

  18. #98
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Oh, and by the way don’t forget everything you say is a matter of concrete fact.

    The concrete proof you have is your endless bullshit that you print of how you and your pals are killing the dumb casino operators counting cards in Las Vegas for what now, ten years straight? Even when you lose 10K playing BJ, the math says you really won 6K. Sad part is you don’t even realize how stupid you sound, then still try to convince everyone else their the idiot.

    The only people your fooling are newbies. You certainly can’t pull your nonsense on veterans. Card Counting Black-Jack for a living today in Las Vegas. Are you fucking kidding me? It must have been the advantage game changes they made for the players over the past years.
    You don't deserve a response, but I will give one. When I share my blackjack results, no they are "concrete" as you say, meaning backed up by documentation. People including yourself are free to believe or not believe me. BUT, the difference between that and Singer's claims are that mine are mathematically possible, while his 100% go against the mathematical possibility.

    I don't claim to have run a 2 minute mile, or jumped so high that I couldn't breath for lack of air, or seen 18 y.o's in a row or made a million dollars grinding away at negative EV video poker play. ALL of which are mathematically impossible! I claim to be grinding away a small advantage playing blackjack, something hundred of players still do, because despite what you have decided, it is still quite possible. Harder than it used to be, but still VERY mathematically possible.

    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I’m going to plead to Dan for your banning, on the grounds of you whining like a bitch with mans genitalia.
    And this show who you really are. Incapable of discussion or making your points and/or arguments without personal attacks like a 6 year old.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 04-03-2018 at 07:30 PM.

  19. #99
    Mr. Mendelson is actually the dangerous part of this duo, as nobody buys Argentino's stuff anymore without somebody credible backing him up. I find it hard to believe Mr. Mendelson glances away as Argentino, on the idiot GF site, rants about:

    1) I am texting him or have people texting him. That is seriously delusional. It suggests real mental illness -- paranoia.
    2) I was never married. That is fascinating, and I do not know how or why he drew that conclusion, but again -- why would he decide to obsess on my late wife? Some kind of sickness, once again.
    3) He ignores every link, every reference to a number to call to verify anything I've done, has ignored offers for me to hand deliver a bio package to him, and just insists I'm not who I say I am.


    These are three separate cues to some serious mental illness. I suspect his fixation on mickeycrimm's drinking has to do with Argentino's own issues with the bottle and addiction in general.

    And yet, Mr. Mendelson thinks this is someone with whom to associate and from whom to take gambling advice. That is so irresponsible, it's ridiculous.

    Fortunately we live in an era wherein associations have risk and reward.

  20. #100
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    You know things can’t be right when your upset about being banned from an idiot like Mike and carry on about it like a bitch still today.
    I am over my banning at WoV. I don't think I could participate at that site, with what it has become, if I was invited too. While I really no longer care, unfortunately, I HAVE to keep bringing up every few months. It's a promise I made (remember the so called "threat") to Mr Shackleford and I intend to keep it. I think I said 40 years. 2 down...38 to go.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •