Kewlj, why don't you call Rob Singer a con man and a nut job to his face?
Oh, and by the way don’t forget everything you say is a matter of concrete fact.
The concrete proof you have is your endless bullshit that you print of how you and your pals are killing the dumb casino operators counting cards in Las Vegas for what now, ten years straight? Even when you lose 10K playing BJ, the math says you really won 6K. Sad part is you don’t even realize how stupid you sound, then still try to convince everyone else their the idiot.
The only people your fooling are newbies. You certainly can’t pull your nonsense on veterans. Card Counting Black-Jack for a living today in Las Vegas. Are you fucking kidding me? It must have been the advantage game changes they made for the players over the past years.
I don’t think you’re like all the other hustling AP’s on this site, you’re just a fool crying for some type of attention. Your past postings and endless crying like a bitch confirms that diagnosis, and I’m not even a doctor.
You know things can’t be right when your upset about being banned from an idiot like Mike and carry on about it like a bitch still today.
I’m going to plead to Dan for your banning, on the grounds of you whining like a bitch with mans genitalia.
Why anyone would defend the loser POS is beyond me, but let’s face it, anyone who has watched your show would understand. You were a legitimate reporter years ago, no doubt, but now you will take the cash and push almost any business using your old credibility.
Add the fact that you are concerned about Singer shows there is more to this relationship than meets the eye.
Who had the under 6 months on Alan coming back?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
A $2000 bankroll. I don't know what game or games I will be playing. It depends on what's showing advantage on the particular day. I'll turn the $2000 into $2500 in a sixteen hour window. It won't take that long but I don't want to put any pressure on myself.
Now here is a bit of advice, Alan. Do you know how easy it is to set things up where you or anyone else see's me win $500 a day? Everyday? I have no chance to lose because you and your film crew are all suckers. I'll set you assholes up. And you and your crew won't figure things out until after it's over with and I have your money pocketed. Send that to the TV producers.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Obviously there will be no TV show with mickeycrimm.
Good, I'm glad that's settled. I don't want to be on a damn TV show anyway. But anyways, I'll give you guys a clue on how easy it is to set up a win. There are several ways. But I think the one that is most funny to me. I'm LMAO thinking about you guys standing there watching me and YOUR money on the line. I simply make a deal with an agent to create multipliers for me on Ultimate X. Just two machines needed. He creates multipliers on several games then cashes out. I slip in the seat and clean the multipliers up. He creates multipliers on several games on the machine beside it then cashes out, then I clean up those multipliers. And we go back and forth until I have produced the $500 earn.
Alan, I've exposed the hustle to you but it would have been funny, funny, funny as hell watching your jaw drop while I pulled that shit on you.
It doesn't matter I've exposed this one way to do it. I have others. So long sucker. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
How can you say that Singer has a basis in math when you yourself say he is doing a fair amount of "hoping". He sometimes uses math and sometimes breaks from the math and "hopes for good luck". What total crap that is. Casinos thrive on gamblers who " try to get lucky"...whether its throwing a 100 dollar chip on the horn or going for a bigger hand on poker like you explained. Those are suckers. The ones dealing with :hope" and "luck". Those are your words. I contend that no gambler is successful in the long run depending on luck and hope. You need something more concrete to hang your hat on.
The first time I played BJ when resorts international opened in AC late 70's...I didnt know what the fuck I was doing and I split any 10 value card...to the groans of the table as I did it. I turned 100 into 300 in 45 min doing that. It was all hope and luck. I didnt play based on the reality of the math. Call it beginners luck. Call it good fortune. Whatever the fuck you want.....but I learned real fast I couldnt sustain that in the long run.
And if Singer plays with some math and other times tosses it our the window,,,,,he is just as proficient as I was when I played on BJ with great "hope" and in search of "luck"
LarryS I suggest you watch the videos with Singer. The information is there about what he does. But to summarize: Rob Singer follows the math of video poker the same way Dancer and Grochowski and all the APs do. But that gets lost in everything else he says.
Ya know, 10% of what Rob says is good info and 90% is flack. You're all caught up on the flack.
You don't deserve a response, but I will give one. When I share my blackjack results, no they are "concrete" as you say, meaning backed up by documentation. People including yourself are free to believe or not believe me. BUT, the difference between that and Singer's claims are that mine are mathematically possible, while his 100% go against the mathematical possibility.
I don't claim to have run a 2 minute mile, or jumped so high that I couldn't breath for lack of air, or seen 18 y.o's in a row or made a million dollars grinding away at negative EV video poker play. ALL of which are mathematically impossible! I claim to be grinding away a small advantage playing blackjack, something hundred of players still do, because despite what you have decided, it is still quite possible. Harder than it used to be, but still VERY mathematically possible.
And this show who you really are. Incapable of discussion or making your points and/or arguments without personal attacks like a 6 year old.
Last edited by kewlJ; 04-03-2018 at 07:30 PM.
Mr. Mendelson is actually the dangerous part of this duo, as nobody buys Argentino's stuff anymore without somebody credible backing him up. I find it hard to believe Mr. Mendelson glances away as Argentino, on the idiot GF site, rants about:
1) I am texting him or have people texting him. That is seriously delusional. It suggests real mental illness -- paranoia.
2) I was never married. That is fascinating, and I do not know how or why he drew that conclusion, but again -- why would he decide to obsess on my late wife? Some kind of sickness, once again.
3) He ignores every link, every reference to a number to call to verify anything I've done, has ignored offers for me to hand deliver a bio package to him, and just insists I'm not who I say I am.
These are three separate cues to some serious mental illness. I suspect his fixation on mickeycrimm's drinking has to do with Argentino's own issues with the bottle and addiction in general.
And yet, Mr. Mendelson thinks this is someone with whom to associate and from whom to take gambling advice. That is so irresponsible, it's ridiculous.
Fortunately we live in an era wherein associations have risk and reward.
I am over my banning at WoV. I don't think I could participate at that site, with what it has become, if I was invited too. While I really no longer care, unfortunately, I HAVE to keep bringing up every few months. It's a promise I made (remember the so called "threat") to Mr Shackleford and I intend to keep it. I think I said 40 years. 2 down...38 to go.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)