The Reinstate Argentino Thread

[redietz]

Redietz, the $30 to $35 Super Bowl error was suppose to be 30k to 35k, correct? I thought you just said you don't wager in those amounts.

Please point to any posts Boz made here with useful information, not a wise crack.

Your good bye to Boz was obvious an attempt for Dans attention. Look Dan, your losing Boz, and all his valuable inside information from decades of gambling experiences he endlessly shares with your readers.

Blackhole, I'm done with you after this last post. I never said I don't wager in those amounts. And thanks for the opportunity to blow my own horn again. I would never wager 30k to 35K on a Super Bowl unless it was a futures hedge or unless...I won the Heritage Sports Race to the Super Bowl Contest (against thousands of entrants) and won 25K in bets that had to be used on the Super Bowl. Mr. Mendelson actually saw the link with my name winning the thing, and you can call Heritage to verify, but we know you won't because you're a lazy boy. Now, because I would never risk 25K on a game with no meaning to me, I had to counter that 25K with an additional 12.5K wagered the other way as I took roughly 40 attempts at middling various props. Ergo the 30K to 35K figure.

Thanks for the opportunity to report my having won that contest. I appreciate the "advertising." (See what I did there?)

[Rob.Singer]

The only one of Argentino's many fascinating statements I wish to correct is the one where he says that I am calling him every week to sell him something. That's a really weird blatant lie.

I have never done phone solicitation in my life. Never. Not once. Not when I started at 21. Not in the 40 years since. And I certainly never called Argentino.

So whatever the truth value of Argentino's other statements, I have to call him out as baldly lying for some blessed reason about that one. Maybe it's an attempt to procure my phone number to check against whatever number's calling him. I have no idea what the rationale is, but it's an odd thing to throw out there in his first post because it almost assuredly requires me to respond.

If anyone has any theories as to why he would claim this, now's the time to let me know.

Would you mind quoting Rob's post where he allegedly says you call him? I can't seem to find it and since this is so crucial we should all see it.

The only reference to contact I saw was when Rob posted this:

"...so he can try and sell them his picks like he does me EVERY SINGLE WEEK,..."

There is no reference to a phone call or phone calls. Redietz might you use emails? Or ads sent to Rob through various websites?

Here is the full reference written by Rob and again I see nothing about phone calls:

" Several posters here have already done a nice job exposing his silly intentions, his non-stop self-advertisement and his weasel-wording people into getting in touch with him so he can try and sell them his picks like he does me EVERY SINGLE WEEK, his refusals to post anything he claims about himself, and they've taken him to extreme task for becoming the troll that he now is known for being. Nuff said. "

In the GF exchange between us over on www.gamblingforums.com, Argentino mentions that I am texting him. I am not. It made me feel like there is a real mental issue with Argentino.

I have not emailed anyone any ads. I don't do bulk email ads, or individual email ads. I did not advertise "through various websites." I did not advertise at all this past season. I haven't advertised at all in roughly a decade.

What is really bizarre is that Argentino says I am trying to sell him picks "EVERY SINGLE WEEK." That is really, really strange for reasons that are obvious to anyone who knows me.

It's pretty weird for someone who gets reinstated to immediately lie about something like this.

It's even stranger when Argentino doesn't reply, but Mr. Mendelson is first at bat. Since Mr. Mendelson was, by his own admission, in touch with Argentino during the last 24 hours, I would think he was aware of the GF exchange and the texting comments.

Argentino comes back, and in his first post lies about something like this. What a credible dude. And as hot as Argentino was to post when he returned, when I call him out on this lie, there is no response from him. Just from Mr. Mendelson. Obviously, if Argentino had ads or emails from me soliciting him, they would have been posted already. Very strange. Why lie when you're going to be called on it? Maybe something is really wrong with Argentino. Or it's tough to deviate from SOP.

It doesn't surprise me--or probably even anyone--that the denials are flowing from red when it comes to "Argentino". I imagine it'll go down as just another claim being made by a known person against an anonymous one. Oh wait!----that's backwards! Or is it....

[redietz]

Argentino, why did you lie about my trying to sell you stuff? You come back here and lie through your teeth to get things rolling. Why would you do that?

[Ozzy]

Over/Under amount of days before Singer/ LarryS heat things up?

[mickeycrimm]

Over/Under amount of days before Singer/ LarryS heat things up?

Singerwelsher ran for the hills the last time he got questioned by Larry.

[blackhole]

Blackhole, I'm done with you after this last post.

Of course your done with me, your side stepping is being exposed.

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...ll=1#post62637

[Bill Yung]

LarryS is "the smoking man".

[Rob.Singer]

Smoking cigarettes is only done by illiterate, confidence-lacking people. Smoking pot is only done by extremely stupid people. Neither cares a lick about their own bodies or health.

Are you saying Larry us one of these? I would think a pharmacist would know to stay away from this stuff.

[Rob.Singer]

Over/Under amount of days before Singer/ LarryS heat things up?

Singerwelsher ran for the hills the last time he got questioned by Larry.

Mickey, it stands to reason in the non-alcoholic world, that after an explanation is given three times and the other keeps making the same comments, that nothing more can be done. You're kinda like that, only you approach issues from the two-bit bum perspective, while Larry uses a bit more finesse.

[MisterV]

Smoking pot is only done by extremely stupid people. Neither cares a lick about their own bodies or health.

I've smoked weed pretty regularly since I was in high school, and neither I nor those who know and deal with me would ever consider me to be "extremely stupid."

I work out and exercise daily (calisthentics, pilates, yoga, weights, walking) and take a variety of vitamins / minerals / supplements.

My health is fine.

Swing and a miss there, Rob: swing and a miss.

[Rob.Singer]

The mere fact that you've smoked weed puts you into my "stupid" category--at least on that issue. Putting any kind of smoke into the human body is very counterproductive and dangerous to a life. It's fine that you became involved with activities that are considered healthy. But to me, it only makes sense to do the things that are proven to be beneficial to our amazing bodies, and reject anything that is proven unhealthy.

[mickeycrimm]

The mere fact that you've smoked weed puts you into my "stupid" category--at least on that issue. Putting any kind of smoke into the human body is very counterproductive and dangerous to a life. It's fine that you became involved with activities that are considered healthy. But to me, it only makes sense to do the things that are proven to be beneficial to our amazing bodies, and reject anything that is proven unhealthy.

Which is why you've been hanging out in smoke filled casinos for 20 years. Every week for 20 years.

[mickeycrimm]

Over/Under amount of days before Singer/ LarryS heat things up?

Singerwelsher ran for the hills the last time he got questioned by Larry.

Mickey, it stands to reason in the non-alcoholic world, that after an explanation is given three times and the other keeps making the same comments, that nothing more can be done. You're kinda like that, only you approach issues from the two-bit bum perspective, while Larry uses a bit more finesse.

Hurry up and get your 3 explanations out here so you can be rebanned.

[mickeycrimm]

I see the problem with posting anything contrary to what the uneducated and under-educated do and think they've read, continues to apply to mickey.

Once again, the strategy for SPS is 300 credits of BP & 100 credits of SDBP (or a game from the posted list) at each denomination of $1/$2/$5/10/$25/$100. That's $57,200. That's what the required bankroll is for one session. The required bankroll overall is 3X that amount--or $171,600.

I've posted this time and again, only for some reason mickey doesn't want it to be this way.

Have another gulp!

It's difficult to follow everything in your rambling posts. You probably are confusing SPS with ARTT and RTT somehow. Either way, you didn't get much right.

Your reading comprehension is horrible. I got the bankroll right and your claimed 85% success rate right. And your claimed weekly trip to the casino for ten years. That's about 500 visits. And you call others casino rats?

Rob: "Casinos are filthy vile places. I spend as little time in them as possible."

Rob: "The wife and I will be spending the holidays at blah blah casino."

[Rob.Singer]

The mere fact that you've smoked weed puts you into my "stupid" category--at least on that issue. Putting any kind of smoke into the human body is very counterproductive and dangerous to a life. It's fine that you became involved with activities that are considered healthy. But to me, it only makes sense to do the things that are proven to be beneficial to our amazing bodies, and reject anything that is proven unhealthy.

Which is why you've been hanging out in smoke filled casinos for 20 years. Every week for 20 years.

Are you ever right? I may go to a casino once every 3 months since 2011, and I stay as far away from the sickly smokers as possible. And going somewhere where there's smoke has nothing to do with what and why idiots like you worship the cancer sticks.

[Rob.Singer]

I see the problem with posting anything contrary to what the uneducated and under-educated do and think they've read, continues to apply to mickey.

Once again, the strategy for SPS is 300 credits of BP & 100 credits of SDBP (or a game from the posted list) at each denomination of $1/$2/$5/10/$25/$100. That's $57,200. That's what the required bankroll is for one session. The required bankroll overall is 3X that amount--or $171,600.

I've posted this time and again, only for some reason mickey doesn't want it to be this way.

Have another gulp!

It's difficult to follow everything in your rambling posts. You probably are confusing SPS with ARTT and RTT somehow. Either way, you didn't get much right.

Your reading comprehension is horrible. I got the bankroll right and your claimed 85% success rate right. And your claimed weekly trip to the casino for ten years. That's about 500 visits. And you call others casino rats?

Rob: "Casinos are filthy vile places. I spend as little time in them as possible."

Rob: "The wife and I will be spending the holidays at blah blah casino."

You're showing you're just as dumb as ever. Ten years ended in May 2009, and my wife never went with me. The part you got right was casinos are filthy places.

You got the bankroll completely wrong. But what can one expect from an uneducated bum.

[mickeycrimm]

[QUOTE=blackhole;62654]

Of course your done with me, your side stepping is being exposed.

Fuck off, idiot.

[mickeycrimm]

The mere fact that you've smoked weed puts you into my "stupid" category--at least on that issue. Putting any kind of smoke into the human body is very counterproductive and dangerous to a life. It's fine that you became involved with activities that are considered healthy. But to me, it only makes sense to do the things that are proven to be beneficial to our amazing bodies, and reject anything that is proven unhealthy.

Which is why you've been hanging out in smoke filled casinos for 20 years. Every week for 20 years.

Are you ever right? I may go to a casino once every 3 months since 2011, and I stay as far away from the sickly smokers as possible. And going somewhere where there's smoke has nothing to do with what and why idiots like you worship the cancer sticks.

Rob: "The wife and I will be spending the holidays at blah blah casino."

[mickeycrimm]

[QUOTE=mickeycrimm;62609]

That would total to $57,200. And that he uses three of these bankrolls so the money totals to $171,600. These are his numbers that he has used over and over and over again in the forums. Now he is trying to tell us something different. I'm not going for it.

Right here, Rob, dumass. I posted this early this morning. You wanna tell me I'm wrong now? I know what you're up to, dude. You want to keep stiring the shit so you can't get pinned down.

[mickeycrimm]

Rob has stated over and over again his tactics generate an 85% success rate. That means it failed 15% of the time. 500 casino visits in 10 years. He would have met his win goal 425 times and lost $57,200 a total of 75 times.

Out of the 425 times times he succeeded what would be the average win to overcome the 75 times he lost $57,200 and also make $1,000,000.

75 X 57,200 = $4,290,000
Add $100,000,000 to it for a total of $5,290,000
Divide 5,290,000 by 425 and Rob's average winning session would have to be $12,447.

He claims a session averaged about 4 hours. That would be the highest average hourly rate I've ever heard of. That's $3,111 an hour.

And he says he quit using this system because it affected the taxes on his measly social security check.

How many of you would quit using a system that produced such a win?