Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 252

Thread: Challenge to Singer / Argentino

  1. #21
    If I recall correctly, Rob said his Schedule C deductions passed two IRS audits.

    This is to respond to what Kewlj wrote "deductions for "parties, dinners with wife and groceries". Doing so would be tax fraud and I don't think even Singer is stupid enough to do this and post about it."

  2. #22
    Kewlj just as a point of information, as a professional blackjack player do you file a Schedule C? Why or why not?

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    How would we know if you have two tax returns for each year? One return sent to the IRS and one return for show?

    I could go on TurboTax right now and create a very profitable tax return to show you... and to win a bet. LOL.
    Alan, this is precisely why we would employ a professional tax audit service. Part of the process would be that we would both be required to sign releases for the independent auditors to access our official person tax records for examination.

    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Coach belly you are simply trying to bluff on behalf of your idol Singer. You are going to lose this one.
    Singer is not my idol, and I am not bluffing.

    You are bluffing unless you answer my question...how much to see your audit?
    The end process of this challenge would be that the independent auditor would release his findings based on actual tax records. The actual tax records would not be released. Nobody in his right mind would agree to that, because of personal information, but the findings of the independent professional auditor would be released.

    I envision some sort of released statement such as player X, had a total of reported net winnings of xxxx and player Y had a total reported net winnings of xxxx. I am sure player X and Y could be replaced with some identifying thing like our handles. This is why we would be paying a professional auditor to act as referee.

    So in answer to your question, coach, you get access to the findings for free!!! As part of the process. All you have to do is get Singer to agree and put up his share. Or put it up for him. Or whatever group effort you want. Makes no difference to me.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    If I recall correctly, Rob said his Schedule C deductions passed two IRS audits.
    Alan you really need to stop believing everything this clown says. Usually a conman can not get way with his con, without the help of a knowing or unknowing accomplish or enabler. In this instance, you sir have filled that role for years. The only question that remains is the knowing or unknowing part.

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Kewlj just as a point of information, as a professional blackjack player do you file a Schedule C? Why or why not?
    During the course of my career, I have filed both as an individual and as a business. There are benefits to both options. Tax laws changed a bit, I don't know 4 or 5 years ago (since I have been in Vegas) and I currently file as an individual. I have one of the top gaming tax experts in Las Vegas.

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    So in answer to your question, coach, you get access to the findings for free!!!
    Just in case Singer refuses to accept your challenge, how much would it take for you to release your audit
    so that I could post the information here?

  7. #27
    KJ, you do realize that if the challenge is accepted your desired anonymity will be gone with the wind?
    What, Me Worry?

  8. #28
    doesnt the original post require that singer is interested in what KJ thinks....or what anyone here on the board thinks of him.

    I know I dont care. And any well adjusted person with a life wouldnt care or give a shit what is said here enough to comply with something as elaborate as described in the OP.

    its just an example of the mental state of KJ. He is convinced that he is "hated" by mr V.......another example of thinking someone gives a shit about people on this board enough to generate hatred.

    It seems KJ you are projecting your misplaced feelings onto others. I think you are the only person who has angst over what people think about you.

    You are willing to do what you say in the original post......but dude.....that is not normal. You come across as a nut.

    Yes singer comes across as a nut....a different type of nut than you...but a nut none-the -less, But he doesnt give a shit what you or the other nameless faceless people think or believe about him.
    Just from the way he posts.....get it through your head....its obvious....he doesnt give a shit who believes him...as it should be.

    Just because allan sucks his dick, doesnt mean anyone else here thinks he made money in the long run from a negative expectation game. I dont know why you keep responding to him and alan as if they are some authority. You give them both too much credit.

    They are just as big nobodies as you and me. Just because they put their name out there....doesnt give them any more credibility than you or me.

    they put their names out there because they are attention whores...and you, KJ give them all the attention they crave. You give them the exchanges they want. You make a great punching bag for them. You continually offer yourself up to them....and dance like a monkey for them as they comment and you fly off the handle.
    Its obvious they both get pleasure fucking with your mind.

    And me and others here eat popcorn and watch the mindfuck unfold....as you allow it to unfold right before us.

    The long original post show just how mind fucked you are. What an off the wall, bizarre proposition.

    only someone needing the approval of others will take your offer. You obviously need the approval of others. ..even if its from total anonymous strangers.....and thatis your sickness.

  9. #29
    Thank you for your opinion LarryS.

  10. #30
    LarryS., most of us are anonymous, but we're not truly strangers; it's a fairly tight little internet community.

    People post a lot about themselves / their gambling because it is part of being human.

    I feel as if I know something about several posters here, certainly more than I would know about someone I'd only just met a few minutes ago.

    So there is a degree of familiarity, but whether the face people present for public consumption is their true face: aye, there's the rub.
    What, Me Worry?

  11. #31
    This statement by kewlj is very ironic:

    "Usually a conman can not get way with his con, without the help of a knowing or unknowing accomplish or enabler. In this instance, you sir have filled that role for years. The only question that remains is the knowing or unknowing part."

    Wasn't it you who said something about not having to speak the truth on a forum?

    Anyway, Rob's statements about his taxes were all made on this open forum. They were not made on my website or in any interviews I did with him. I enabled his claims as much as I enabled your claims about your income.

    Stop accusing me. And if you want to make accusations use your real name because right now I know you only as the poster who says there's no reason to tell the truth.

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post

    Wasn't it you who said something about not having to speak the truth on a forum?
    Are you smoking crack Alan? Trying to give you the benefit of doubt, I can only guess that you grossly mis-understood something I said. But I have no idea what that may have been. Please fill me in by sharing where you think I said such a thing.

  13. #33
    Kewlj, do you remember posting this?


    Thread: Expected Value Discussion
    by kewlJ Replies
    276
    Views
    4,226
    My philosophy is that no one is required to prove...
    My philosophy is that no one is required to prove anything on these forums. These are anonymous forums....especially for AP's. Those that don't AP and chose to disclose who they are, that is...

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Kewlj, do you remember posting this?


    Thread: Expected Value Discussion
    by kewlJ Replies
    276
    Views
    4,226
    My philosophy is that no one is required to prove...
    My philosophy is that no one is required to prove anything on these forums. These are anonymous forums....especially for AP's. Those that don't AP and chose to disclose who they are, that is...
    I do remember posting that Alan. Could you highlight the part where I said people shouldn't speak the truth?

  15. #35
    When you don't have to prove anything you don't have to speak the truth.

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    When you don't have to prove anything you don't have to speak the truth.
    That is an interesting...leap. I guess the mindset of someone basically dishonest (a shyster). "If you don't have to prove it, you don't have to speak the truth".

    So your odd 'leap' aside, let's correct the record here: I never said anything about not speaking the truth on a forum.....as you stated above.

  17. #37
    This challenge is a joke. No way in hell Cousin Eddie(Argentino) has 100k to post. Not even if he sold his dilapidated RV that he parks in his relatives driveways to mooch internet. Simply a waste of time. His buddy Mendelfool can't even pay his own boy, so no loan possibilities there.

  18. #38
    If you don't have to prove anything you don't have to tell the truth. Is that a leap? I'd call it a baby step kewlj.

    I'll even prove to you I lost money in casinos. But I don't think you can prove you won money at blackjack.

    You don't get W2Gs at blackjack and without a players card there's no win/loss statement?

    Tax return? This leads to many questions.

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    If you don't have to prove anything you don't have to tell the truth. Is that a leap? I'd call it a baby step kewlj.

    I'll even prove to you I lost money in casinos. But I don't think you can prove you won money at blackjack.
    Alan, you are crazy. Quite frankly you are getting worse.

  20. #40
    Really kewlj, how would you prove you won money at blackjack without any kind of government record (W2Gs) or casino record linked to a players card?

    Why would you declare all or any of your profits to the IRS when there is no record of you winning? Are you that honest and patriotic?

    You would have an interesting story to tell.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Don't cry for me, Argentino
    By MisterV in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 05-01-2018, 07:49 AM
  2. The Thread Without Argentino
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-15-2018, 02:46 PM
  3. Singer Challenge
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-11-2013, 08:55 PM
  4. Compare THIS Challenge To The Fedomalley Challenge
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2011, 11:35 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 10:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •