Challenge to Singer / Argentino

[mickeycrimm]

Let's keep on the subject of the current challenge. A current challenge can easily be verified with money put into escrow.

It looks like Fezzik's challenge is current.

[Rob.Singer]

I wonder who Kim Lee is........

It's not a "current challenge". If so let's see it. Let's see the proposed parameters. The first point I'd expect to be clarified is where the escrow was said to be held, and how much. Obviously whoever came up with this phony challenge was too stupid to think it thru. I'd expect an escrow of $402,499 for Fezzik since its possible, albeit not probable, that I'll play the $100 machine. Then, how many sessions. My liability will be as much as $114,600/session. So go ahead kim, multiply $402,499 by X amount of sessions. I can handle it--what about all these "capital-heavy" big shots this poster's talking about?

Is your head spinning yet mickey....er, I mean, kimmy?

[mickeycrimm]

I wonder who Kim Lee is........

It's not a "current challenge". If so let's see it. Let's see the proposed parameters. The first point I'd expect to be clarified is where the escrow was said to be held, and how much. Obviously whoever came up with this phony challenge was too stupid to think it thru. I'd expect an escrow of $402,499 since its possible, albeit not probable, that I'll play the $100 machine. Then, how many sessions. My liability will be as much as $114,600/session. So go ahead kim, multiply $402,499 by X amount of sessions. I can handle it--what about all these "capital-heavy" big shots this poster's talking about?

Is your head spinning yet mickey....er, I mean, kimmy?

Nope. Nothing about your fiction writing makes my head swim.

[Rob.Singer]

Haha! So let's see the link to this "current bet!"

Then you can go for that "swim"

[mickeycrimm]

Haha! So let's see the link to this "current bet!"

Then you can go for that "swim"

Kim Lee says he can get you all the action you want. That sounds current to me.

[Rob.Singer]

Haha! So let's see the link to this "current bet!"

Then you can go for that "swim"

Kim Lee says he can get you all the action you want. That sounds current to me.

Then see if you can get him/eddie/Spock/whomever to lock in the bet parameters, and identify where all their "capital" will be escrowed at. You know, things that make bets Real.

[Kim Lee]

Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.

For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.

Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.

[Dan Druff]

There was a simpler challenge. Fezzik offered to meet Rob Singer at his favorite licensed casino machines, and match any wins and losses. For example, if Singer won $2,000, then Singer would keep those winnings, and Fezzik would pay Singer an additional $2,000. But if Singer lost $3,000, then Singer must also pay Fezzik $3,000. This is very simple to understand and administer. Obviously Singer refused the challenge, because he is an internet blowhard poseur.

There is plenty of capital ready to fade Singer's action. It would be easy for Singer to arrange the Fezzik challenge, but he will never do it. So this whole thing is quite boring to me. I've seen this movie, and know how it ends.

I offered the same challenge more recently, and Rob declined it.

[Kim Lee]

[QUOTE=Rob.Singer;72192]

I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499.

That is fine. Please contact attorney Bob Nersesian to arrange escrow for that amount. I will escrow after you. It appears you have already ducked this offer from Fezzik and Dan Druff, so I will be unsympathetic to further evasions.

[Deech]

Looks like I am traveling to Vegas soon. I promise to sit in my favorite seats, the bleachers.

[Rob.Singer]

There was a simpler challenge. Fezzik offered to meet Rob Singer at his favorite licensed casino machines, and match any wins and losses. For example, if Singer won $2,000, then Singer would keep those winnings, and Fezzik would pay Singer an additional $2,000. But if Singer lost $3,000, then Singer must also pay Fezzik $3,000. This is very simple to understand and administer. Obviously Singer refused the challenge, because he is an internet blowhard poseur.

There is plenty of capital ready to fade Singer's action. It would be easy for Singer to arrange the Fezzik challenge, but he will never do it. So this whole thing is quite boring to me. I've seen this movie, and know how it ends.

I offered the same challenge more recently, and Rob declined it.

That's nonsense. You added in one of those silly stipulations that I play some odd combination of denominations that are outside of the strategy you question. Why, I have no idea.

[Rob.Singer]

[QUOTE=Kim Lee;72197]

I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499.

That is fine. Please contact attorney Bob Nersesian to arrange escrow for that amount. I will escrow after you. It appears you have already ducked this offer from Fezzik and Dan Druff, so I will be unsympathetic to further evasions.

Since you are the one proposing the challenge, as I did with that coward Fezzik when I put up the verifiable escrow first and published it in two papers so they actually could and did confirm the funds were there up front, it is you who must escrow first. Or, perhaps more appropriately, you and that merry band of capitalists.

I accept Bob N. as the escrow holder. Let me know when the cash is there and I will both contact him for written verification and then hand-deliver my portion.

Now that the easy part is over, I will play $1 thru $25 at the Aquarius in Laughlin, and if required, the $100 machine at Bellagio. Dates TBD. What do you propose? Whatever the dates, I'll play beginning at 11pm so we'll have less distractions.

By the way Mr. "Kim": I know Bob. Holding $500,000+ escrow isn't gonna be free. I paid Casuarina $10,000 to do this when I challenged Fezzik. That should be your responsibility. If you'd like me to discuss this with him I'll be happy to.

Dan---do you recognize there are no 25c games involved, and that there ARE $25 & $100 games??

[kewlJ]

By the way Mr. "Kim": I know Bob. Holding

You do? Can I ask under what name do you know Bob? I had a discussion with him very recently about you and he didn't seem to have a clue who you were by either Robert Harry Argentino, or Rob Singer.

[Rob.Singer]

I just called his office and left a message about the pending escrows and what his fee would be. I'll be very surprised if he's heard of Mr. Kim. When he returns the call I'll report. Kim you can call him also: 702.385.5454

Kew I've met him at a G2 Conference as RS about ten years ago. That's how I know him. Not sure why or if he'd remember me.

[kewlJ]

Kew I've met him at a G2 Conference as RS about ten years ago. That's how I know him. Not sure why or if he'd remember me.

So why would you introduce yourself to an attorney as Rob Singer? Why not use your real name? Oh, yeah, nevermind….I forgot you have judgements and fraud ruling against you in your real name. Not surprised you are running from it. lol


I hope Bob is willing to get involved holding the escrow, but unless he has had a change of heart, I don't think he will.

[mickeycrimm]

Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.

For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.

Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.

Why would he owe you double. All he has to do is match the amount you win. That is, if you win.

[mickeycrimm]

I just called his office and left a message about the pending escrows and what his fee would be. I'll be very surprised if he's heard of Mr. Kim. When he returns the call I'll report. Kim you can call him also: 702.385.5454

Kew I've met him at a G2 Conference as RS about ten years ago. That's how I know him. Not sure why or if he'd remember me.

But you said you kow him as "Bob" not Robert Nersesian. You made it sound like you are both very familiar with each other. Like you two are chums or something. Sneaky, sneaky, Rob.

[Rob.Singer]

I just called his office and left a message about the pending escrows and what his fee would be. I'll be very surprised if he's heard of Mr. Kim. When he returns the call I'll report. Kim you can call him also: 702.385.5454

Kew I've met him at a G2 Conference as RS about ten years ago. That's how I know him. Not sure why or if he'd remember me.

But you said you kow him as "Bob" not Robert Nersesian. You made it sound like you are both very familiar with each other. Like you two are chums or something. Sneaky, sneaky, Rob.

You're such an inexperienced dummy in real life scenarios mickey. His name's the same as mine.

[mickeycrimm]

[QUOTE=mickeycrimm;72209]

I just called his office and left a message about the pending escrows and what his fee would be. I'll be very surprised if he's heard of Mr. Kim. When he returns the call I'll report. Kim you can call him also: 702.385.5454

Kew I've met him at a G2 Conference as RS about ten years ago. That's how I know him. Not sure why or if he'd remember me.

But you said you kow him as "Bob" not Robert Nersesian. You made it sound like you are both very familiar with each other. Like you two are chums or something. Sneaky, sneaky, Rob. So you met briefly in a crowded hall and went right into discussing how much he charges for holding money in escrow?