Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
Learn Singer's "system". PLAY Singer's system. Then come back and tell us about it.
The only intelligent, truthful point you have ever made here.
In order for anyone to support or criticize my play strategy, it is only simple common sense that they fully endorse/put into play what you just said. To do either without the proper knowledge or experience only creates an argument between a dumb person and a smart one. To the dumb & inexperienced one, that 2+2 will always equal 5, unless and until they heed your words above. And taking the easy way out of the argument by simply saying "+EV = winning and -EV = losing" is only done by the timid and afraid.
Rob, why do you have to stoop to the name calling, attacks, and trying to tear other people down? If your system is really what you claim, let it stand on its own merit. If your system really worked there would be no need to call people dumb and stupid, uneducated, or attack someone on the basis of sex, religion, sexual orientation or anything else, including things like someone's former battle with alcoholism. Someone who engages in this kind of behavior is compensating for their own shortcomings, or in this case the short comings of your "system". You aren't fooling anyone here, with that nonsense.