Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
First, Rob demands proof from everyone else but he has never provided proof of HIS claims. He could finally have done so with the tax returns supposed to go to Alan. But he welshed that one. Lead by example, Rob.
2nd, can any AP really prove their claims without exposing their true identity? This is a problem for AP's and one that Rob exploits. For good reason AP's want their identity protected from casino personnel learning it. So Rob gets to say "These phony anonymous AP's won't put up proof of anything."
And I've said this before. Most AP's don't mind Rob because he spreads faulty information about advantage play.