I have a pretty good handle on math, so I can actually say with each, "Average gambler," playing a limited sample of games that some average gamblers almost MUST be winners if there is a large enough sample of average gamblers.
I don't dispute Singer's reported earnings, how the hell could I? I've never even met the guy and I also don't know what specifics he has reported.
Your issue with what and how I do what I do stems from the same ignorance every ap-critic finds themselves doing: you have very little knowledge of the strategy, yet you single out the best point that you can create the most self-assuring argument over. If you were an employee of mine you'd have been fired the first week for making such a false, unverified, unknowledgeable assumption based on what you believe others like you long to hear--and then running with it.
The increase in denomination isn't the only "progression". Game volatility also increases. And there are as many reductions in denominations as there are increases as you work your way thru the structure. This is a main part of the strategy, and is the #1 aspect every critic chooses to sweep under the rug as they clamor to manufacture false misrepresentations about SPS.
I haven't made "millions" doing this as you assert. I made just under $1million, with the other $500k or so being a result of my other two strategies. And the pay back percentage of a machine has very little to do with my results. Yes I may have another $150k in profits maybe had there been only 100 per cent or greater games available thru the $100 machines, but there isn't and wasn't. And since I NEVER add in any of the slot club fluff that the ap's rely on so as to be able to create yet another winning year out of a loser, my results are pure.
Mickey, please refrain from hijacking yet another thread by trying to make this about you. Nobody cares about how many years an anonymous poster claims to have done anything.
While progressives are the subject...
I calculate the game at 99.6% without the meters. The meter runs at 1% with 2cents towards the royal, 1c towards the AWAK, and two cents towards the other 3 meters. Slot club is worth a little something.
Is there an overlay? The meter has to figure in somehow, but not the full 1%. Afterall, you won't take down all 5 meters in 5 consecutive hands - you will always leave some behind. Then, how much of the meter? .25 or .50%?
Edit to add the game is 9/5 DDB.
Last edited by ddb1; 08-16-2018 at 02:40 PM.
You ever play 9/5 DDB? Get ready to jump off the cliff. Just as a rule of thumb you want Double Royal. You can start earlier but you want Double Royal minimum.
You are better off playing the 4 way Royal at Boulder Station when you get a 32k average and above on 7/5 Bonus Poker. That two pair game makes things smoother.
The 25-cents video poker progressive games at Red Rock were back to around $2900 early this morning and that's where I used today's $50 of free play.
Win poker puts those numbers at 100.76%. You have to reevaluate the numbers every time you hit a meter.
You have some equity in the meter movement but only a fraction. One of the problems you will encounter is more people playing the higher the royal gets. That cuts into your meter earn because as more people play the odds get longer that you will be the one to hit the high royal number.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Alan, why didn't you hold just the King at at the 1:33 mark ("https://youtu.be/O1Qlqxml5ng?t=93") ?
At the 2:56 mark you then go on to not hold the pair of 8s and instead hold the open straight ? ("https://youtu.be/O1Qlqxml5ng?t=176")
Wow at 3:16 you fucking hold a high card instead of a pair of 7s ?! ("https://youtu.be/O1Qlqxml5ng?t=196")
Maybe you are deliberately making mistakes as some sort of troll move.
At 1:33 didn't I hold KhTh? You wanted me just to hold the king and give up a shot at a $2900 royal?
Yes I gave up the pair of 7s to hold a single high card. At 6/5 vs a $2900 royal I didn't care about a pair of 7s.
Would I do that normally? No.
The open ended straight vs 88 was a toss up for me. On a 6/5 game did I really care seeing a pair of 8s? No. I was hoping for royal cards.
At the time I was the only player. There are only five seats.
M - thanks for the tip on the Vue bar. I'm enjoying my time there.
He's willing to give up 77 (2 times) for a high card. Why? Because he wants to hit the royal or some shit? If thats the case, why bother to hold two non suited high cards? In one of his other videos he holds the a pair over an open ended and in this one he hold the open ended. The truth is, he just has no clue what the hell he is doing.
His videos are very educational... HOW NOT TO PLAY VP.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
It can get loud up there. If I play up there and it has been over a year now but if I do, it is usually is at 2 or 3 am and I am asking them to turn the music down as the sweepers mop around me. Actually I have many more little spots like that to post but been lazy. Last week I took some pictures of progressives and was going to post them the day before a good point day but I just got lazy. One of these days I will get around to it and map this out better.
Last edited by monet; 08-30-2018 at 05:34 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)