Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
While it's fine to question Rob's claims of having won money with his system, that has been done 100000000000 times over the years on this forum. I left up the posts objecting to Rob's claims, and let's drop the subject from this thread.
Frankly 100000000000 times questioning Rob's claims is NOT enough! Rob's claims need to be objected to every single time they are raised. It is NOT opinion, these claims go against the math, against reality and need to be challenged at every opportunity. And the same exact thing with Alan's 18 y.o.'s in a row. This isn't opinion.....this is MATH. Impossible is impossible and should be called it every time.
AND these two claims, and the impossibility of both, goes directly to the credibility of everything else these two individuals say. IMO, every other thing they say, whether related or not should come with a disclaimer that
"this person claims to have seen 18 y.o.'s in a row" or
"this person claims to have made a million dollars playing -EV video poker with a progression betting system".
These two continuing claims goes directly to their credibility on all things.