Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: mickeycrimm, move over....

  1. #1
    I just read an article about a gambler named "Eddie Teams" who, like mickey, claims to be the best vulturing and grind-away advantage player in the world. Only this guy actually allows critics and reporters witness what he does and how he does it.

    So mickey, what say you to this new-found king? And since he claims to make far more than what you claim, certainly a colorful array of vulgarity and threats are in order.

    I imagine the armchair gamblers here will groan about him making his plays and methods public.

    Where's the beef?
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 08-16-2018 at 12:28 PM.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    I was hoping for more about dice control then just a mention.

    There are no new ideas. It's all about using them.

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I just read an article about a gambler named "Eddie Teams" who, like mickey, claims to be the best vulturing and grind-away advantage player in the world. Only this guy actually allows critics and reporters witness what he does and how he does it.

    So mickey, what say you to this new-found king? And since he claims to make far more than what you claim, certainly a colorful array of vulgarity and threats are in order.

    I imagine the armchair gamblers here will groan about him making his plays and methods public.

    Where's the beef?
    He's not the only one that makes a lot more than I do. I know all about working multiple cards but am I going to do it? I don't care to work that hard. We got a guy right here, Monet, that does things similar to Teams. More power to them. And I learned a few things in the article.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #5
    The way I understand it, MC is in a juicy spot. He has a ton of small Casinos with unlimited amounts of progressive games. Games that the House doesn't even understand completely. Keno can be huge if you understand it and MC clearly does. MC has little or no competition. If I was 15/20 years younger I'd take a 6 month vacation to his spot and look it over and hope to learn. The guy has hardly any risk or fluctuations in variance. My numbers go up and down in a wild ride daily. It's not easy or exactly fun and it is a ton of work. MC is in a spot like how Vegas was 20-30 years ago.

  6. #6
    This is a tough spot for poor Robbo. It either shows what Mick, Monet and other have stated is possible. Or he can push the idea CA was scammed by this guy looking for a story. Of course the idea that everything in the story is an extension of what AP’s have been doing for years, never entered his mind. Instead he is arguing these results are not possible the entire time by using simple math.

    Or the best bet is he already reached out to CA trying to get an article on him showing how to win consistently when all the math is against you. Pushing it as him being the luckiest man alive.

    Meanwhile Alan is still trying to debate math because he read something else in a strategy book.

  7. #7
    I don’t believe this article denigrates Mickey in any way. If anything, it validates his methods, and the concept of advantage play in general.

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I just read an article about a gambler named "Eddie Teams" who, like mickey, claims to be the best vulturing and grind-away advantage player in the world. Only this guy actually allows critics and reporters witness what he does and how he does it.
    Who are Teams' critics and reporters? And what do they know?

    I had the best gambling critics in the world scrutinizing my work for a couple of years on WoV. While obviously everyone is not an expert on WoV there are still a lot of experts there. Not only world class AP's but also video game designers like Mathextremist, Crystalmath and DRich.

    I put up many of my plays and the strategies I employed, math and everything. When you do something like that in front of a group like that you better expect to get hammered if you are wrong in any way. I weathered that storm pretty good. I never got called a dumass or a quack. And I think many were interested in what I was writing about. I know this, I certainly deserved to be nuked long before racking up 7 suspensions. They bent over backwards to keep me there. I think that was because of what I wrote about when I was sober. But in the end I just couldn't keep my foot out of my drunken mouth. LOL. All of that was my fault, no one else's. In the end I would put up a group of WoV experts against any other group in the world.

    PS You can bet your bippy that a lot of WoV'ers are over here reading my harley strategy.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    This is a tough spot for poor Robbo. It either shows what Mick, Monet and other have stated is possible. Or he can push the idea CA was scammed by this guy looking for a story. Of course the idea that everything in the story is an extension of what AP’s have been doing for years, never entered his mind. Instead he is arguing these results are not possible the entire time by using simple math.

    Or the best bet is he already reached out to CA trying to get an article on him showing how to win consistently when all the math is against you. Pushing it as him being the luckiest man alive.

    Meanwhile Alan is still trying to debate math because he read something else in a strategy book.
    Here's the difference genius. People like Teams had money to begin with, and nobody really knows what his TOTAL results are unless they're with him 24/7. Casino action addicts like him are no different than all these big shot million dollars-winning live poker players who regularly end up busted and broke. Again, we know very little about his entire story other than what he claims.

    You believe in the bs monet tosses around because you want to. It helps you cope from your armchair position. Why don't you ask him to prove something here for a change instead of making up all those stories....including of family, diseases, etc. He's your typical bored, unemployed bum looking for attention on the internet.

    And then there's mickey....who brags about being a two-bitalcoholic slug, who says he makes six figures a year playing nickels and quarter keno and slots at questionable obscure Indian casinos....and you're gullible Enid to believe all his nonsense because you want to and maybe even have to.

    Wise up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Roadtrip Question for MickeyCrimm
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-27-2018, 11:42 AM
  2. Can we move to the Monty Hall problem?
    By quahaug in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-02-2018, 12:56 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-05-2014, 01:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •