Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 567891011 LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 202

Thread: I'll Be Making An Official PUBLIC Challenge To The AP "Community

  1. #161
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    It seems none of the so-called AP's have any credibility, balls, or even knowledge when it comes to making online challenges. I've decided to begin working on eliminating their shyness, their anonymity, and their blatant stupidity when going up against me on a forum. And it isn't that hard.

    It seems the latest big mouth "ap challenger" didn't really know how to "lay down the gauntlet" when it comes to making 6-figure bets. As such, I will educated the lot of you once again. When I made the public Fezzik challenge I did it right: I clearly explained all bet parameters, and I put up a verifiable escrow. He had the chance to either accept with the same escrow (in this case) or not. He publicly declined. He had had a big mouth about my results and play strategy up until then--and probably still does. But his actions spoke very clearly.

    That's what I'll be doing in the near future. I will lay out a very clear, precise challenge to any ap who thinks my strategy is "full of it", I'll be doing it in a LV paper, and I will PUT UP THE ESCROW FIRST, AGAIN, IN THE FULL AMOUNT OF POTENTIAL LIABILITY. I'll be identifying some of the most vocal critics from the forums in all their anonymous glory, in case the bet amount can't be stomached by one vile hater. However, anyone who accepts will be required to enter into the bet with their real names. Equal footing all-around.

    Gaming Today was just sold to a close friend of Chuck DiRocco when he was still alive and wanted me to write for him. I'm told he thinks like Chuck and not like Eileen, who was uneasy with my war on AP's.

    I'll keep everyone informed.
    Bump. When's this shit going down, big fella? You've had over a month.
    Why are you concerned--you already chickened out, and you don't have the money to get involved anyway?

    I've contacted GT and the Sun. The Sun isn't interested at this time, and we have to wait for the change of ownership and direction at GT to get grounded. If you didn't drop out of high school you'd look a bit smarter when it comes to business.

  2. #162
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    It seems none of the so-called AP's have any credibility, balls, or even knowledge when it comes to making online challenges. I've decided to begin working on eliminating their shyness, their anonymity, and their blatant stupidity when going up against me on a forum. And it isn't that hard.

    It seems the latest big mouth "ap challenger" didn't really know how to "lay down the gauntlet" when it comes to making 6-figure bets. As such, I will educated the lot of you once again. When I made the public Fezzik challenge I did it right: I clearly explained all bet parameters, and I put up a verifiable escrow. He had the chance to either accept with the same escrow (in this case) or not. He publicly declined. He had had a big mouth about my results and play strategy up until then--and probably still does. But his actions spoke very clearly.

    That's what I'll be doing in the near future. I will lay out a very clear, precise challenge to any ap who thinks my strategy is "full of it", I'll be doing it in a LV paper, and I will PUT UP THE ESCROW FIRST, AGAIN, IN THE FULL AMOUNT OF POTENTIAL LIABILITY. I'll be identifying some of the most vocal critics from the forums in all their anonymous glory, in case the bet amount can't be stomached by one vile hater. However, anyone who accepts will be required to enter into the bet with their real names. Equal footing all-around.

    Gaming Today was just sold to a close friend of Chuck DiRocco when he was still alive and wanted me to write for him. I'm told he thinks like Chuck and not like Eileen, who was uneasy with my war on AP's.

    I'll keep everyone informed.
    Bump. When's this shit going down, big fella? You've had over a month.
    Why are you concerned--you already chickened out, and you don't have the money to get involved anyway?

    I've contacted GT and the Sun. The Sun isn't interested at this time, and we have to wait for the change of ownership and direction at GT to get grounded. If you didn't drop out of high school you'd look a bit smarter when it comes to business.
    So the Sun isn't interested in selling advertising space? Since when? And GT continues to shut you out? Now that I believe.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #163
    Originally Posted by Deech View Post
    I think Redietz tried to sneak the phrase "Pahrump brothels" past us. We all know that this phrase is an anagram for, "Rob Rush Pamphlet" and "Rob Math Spur Help".
    Deech, I don't know how you did this, but wow. That was awesome. Absolutely wild that you could do that. Unbelievable.

  4. #164
    Yeah, the Sun not selling ad space is a bit of a reach. And GT shut him out.

    Surprise, surprise.

  5. #165
    The Sun needs US dollars. When Rob tried to pay with his mind full of 401k imaginary bucks, of course they refused.

  6. #166
    Wait. Wasn't the notice of the challenge supposed to be published in two major newspapers? I was expecting the Review Journal to be one of them.

  7. #167
    Well, now everyone has a chance to prove I'm a d*** f***, a sock puppet, and that I have no grasp of strategy, win/loss goals, special plays, etc. I will gladly apologize and proclaim what a fool I was if this bet is lost- the ORIGINAL bet.

  8. #168
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Well, now everyone has a chance to prove I'm a d*** f***, a sock puppet, and that I have no grasp of strategy, win/loss goals, special plays, etc. I will gladly apologize and proclaim what a fool I was if this bet is lost- the ORIGINAL bet.
    You're nothing but a civilian gambler that's been duped.

  9. #169
    Has anyone else noticed that when Argentino is embarrassed by a particular couple of posts or gets exposed for some obvious fib, that sling chimes in with a non sequitur that refers to something other than the obvious fib? It's never an immediate Argentino response. It's somebody else with something oblique.

    It's only happened about two hundred times, give or take.

    So sling, what about the Argentino promise to run ads in the Sun and have columns in Gaming Today? I know you want to comment on that stuff, right?

  10. #170
    This is Barney,

    My bestest friend the LID is not only a DI but also an APer and has a 12 inch unit.
    Last edited by Barney; 10-02-2018 at 03:36 PM.

  11. #171
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Has anyone else noticed that when Argentino is embarrassed by a particular couple of posts or gets exposed for some obvious fib, that sling chimes in with a non sequitur that refers to something other than the obvious fib? It's never an immediate Argentino response. It's somebody else with something oblique.

    It's only happened about two hundred times, give or take.

    So sling, what about the Argentino promise to run ads in the Sun and have columns in Gaming Today? I know you want to comment on that stuff, right?
    Good ole SingBot.

  12. #172
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Wait. Wasn't the notice of the challenge supposed to be published in two major newspapers? I was expecting the Review Journal to be one of them.
    What was reported was I'd try to get it into in 2 LV publications, as was with the Fezzik demolition.

    Of course redietz wouldn't be able to see it that way, given that all of his expert "publications" never even made it to the internet.

  13. #173
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Wait. Wasn't the notice of the challenge supposed to be published in two major newspapers? I was expecting the Review Journal to be one of them.
    What was reported was I'd try to get it into in 2 LV publications, as was with the Fezzik demolition.

    Of course redietz wouldn't be able to see it that way, given that all of his expert "publications" never even made it to the internet.
    Rob I was sure it was to be a paid advertisement.

  14. #174
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    The Sun needs US dollars. When Rob tried to pay with his mind full of 401k imaginary bucks, of course they refused.
    It's not out of the question for a bunch of struggling casino rats who call themselves ap's, to be jealous and very uneasy at the thought of just how much that bunch have given up wasting time gambling while those of us who've led productive and respectable lives continue to count the money.

    Wise up max. When you get over the fact that I put a pic up of our Newall CLASS A rv here a few years ago, start concentrating on what working class folks accumulate because of their "true advantages" over the gambling ap slugs.

    Goodluck.

  15. #175
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Has anyone else noticed that when Argentino is embarrassed by a particular couple of posts or gets exposed for some obvious fib, that sling chimes in with a non sequitur that refers to something other than the obvious fib? It's never an immediate Argentino response. It's somebody else with something oblique.

    It's only happened about two hundred times, give or take.

    So sling, what about the Argentino promise to run ads in the Sun and have columns in Gaming Today? I know you want to comment on that stuff, right?
    Good ole SingBot.
    I'm just anxious for the challenge to happen. I only contact Rob over the Patriot games- I enjoy teams that are flexible enough to adjust instead of those who are set in their offense or defense. I could care less about his gaming comments to AP's or his caustic remarks. But I do know his strategies and the Single Play Strategy is the best- if one has the time and discipline to do it right.

  16. #176
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    But I do know his strategies and the Single Play Strategy is the best- if one has the time and discipline to do it right.
    The fuck they are!! They are the WORST things you can do in a casino. You have to be an absolute, idiotic moron to believe such stupid bullshit. Dude, you're hopeless!

  17. #177
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    But I do know his strategies and the Single Play Strategy is the best- if one has the time and discipline to do it right.
    The fuck they are!! They are the WORST things you can do in a casino. You have to be an absolute, idiotic moron to believe such stupid bullshit. Dude, you're hopeless!
    That's why I look for the challenge to happen. Actually. I'm basically a selfish person as I could care less if his strategies were accepted. I had 3 friends who watched me play artt and saw me WIN and just shrugged their shoulders and said it was sorta interesting but felt I was just a lucky SOB and I just quit showing anyone after that.I'm actually shocked whenever I read of anyone trying them. So let the challenge begin and THEN let's see who's a moron.

  18. #178
    I still don't know these systems of Rob's including ARTT and whatever else they're called. I would like to see step by step instructions.

    I'm also mystified that the AP critics know it so well.

  19. #179
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I still don't know these systems of Rob's including ARTT and whatever else they're called. I would like to see step by step instructions.

    I'm also mystified that the AP critics know it so well.
    See, this is the problem with deciding to parrot the language of someone who adopts specific lingo to aggrandize themselves. Mr. Mendelson didn't really mean "AP critics" here. He meant something along the lines of "APs who are critics of Singer." But because he decided to use one of Argentino's pet attempts at self-aggrandizement -- framing people who disagree with him as a lump group of "critics" -- Mr. Mendelson butchered clear meaning.

    One could adopt a phrase other than "AP critics" here to describe those who don't agree with Argentino's systems. I mean, really, it's hard to get a plural on the word "supporter" for those systems. Slingshot would count, so that gets you to add the "s" to supporter, but even Mr. Mendelson has said he does not use the systems. Coach belly has never said that he does. Blackhole, an AP critic, has said he thinks the systems are junk. So one has to rely on slingshot to even get the people who advocate the Singer systems to a plural.

    Alternative, and more accurate (Mr. Mendelson advocates accuracy) ways of describing the people who do NOT advocate for the Singer systems might be:

    1) "People who know math."
    2) "People who understand probability theory."
    3) "Potentially everyone but Argentino and slingshot."

    These phrases, if substituted for "the critics," are more accurate for the following reason. Saying "the critics" suggests that there are supporters, critics, and some mathematically neutral ground. There is no mathematically neutral ground containing arguments for and against. That simply is not the case. There is simply the systems and their barely-plural supporters, and there is everyone else.

    In any event, "AP critics" was a very wrong phrase because it could just as easily (I think more likely) mean "critics of APs" rather than "APs who are critics of Singer." Think about how ridiculous it would be for me to say I think, without evidence, that humans descended from koala bears, and everyone who disagrees is "the critics." That's essentially the phraseology that Argentino tries to sell. He's got to bring in slingshot just to get to the plural of "supporter."

  20. #180
    If it weren't for the fact that no one cared about the other corn-filled thread redietz tried to start up, his corny/unimpressive writings wouldn't have showed up here. Now tell me I don't spend the better part of his day deep inside his head.....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-22-2018, 08:24 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-04-2015, 08:58 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-11-2015, 04:03 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-05-2013, 06:42 PM
  5. Compare THIS Challenge To The Fedomalley Challenge
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2011, 11:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •