I don't have a narrative, I originally asked how the loss rebate
could have affected his results if he didn't use it.
I understand that the 888 piece claimed that DJ counted cards,
but in the GWAE interview he denied counting, so I'm not sure what your point is.
Which story do you believe...the one that fits
your narrative?
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
I was not aware that James Grosjean was involved in any way.
Nobody here is aware that Grosjean was involved,
they are assuming it based upon a photo credit on 888.
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
if he was, I can almost guarantee, Johnson was applying some sort of advantage play technique. Probably not card counting though.
Others are insisting that DJ used card-counting in AC,
and it was Grosjean AKA "Andy" who helped him.
But Andy was not in AC with DJ.
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
I can also guarantee Atlantic City casinos involved were watching a player betting $100,000 a hand checking for card counting. Hey I played Atlantic City the first 5 and a half years of my career, so I know they would be looking for that from a player of this size stakes.
Could a player use card-counting spreading techniques while betting $25K+ per hand
without being detected, and either backed off or flat-betted?
Is it likely that a dealer at a $100K max table would expose his hole cards,
like some rookie dealer?
Could DJ have beaten the AC casinos for $15 mil, then get loss rebates in Vegas?
Wouldn't word have gotten to LV?
Can a player sit down at a high stakes table with Grosjean in Las Vegas
and not draw scrutiny?