Cheung Yin Sun - Greatest Woman Gambler Ever

[MisterV]

Hey alan, you find a new wife yet?

Or if not a wife, then maybe a shack up?

It sure looks like you need some soothing, feminine wiles to help calm you down and keep you centered.

A retained excess of unevacuated testosterone in the scrotum is probably not a good thing.

Just sayin'.

[Rob.Singer]

Once again, the original message from redietz asking me to do NOTHING with his package. And this is what you all trolled me over? Read it yorselves... again. And fuck off.

Either redietz has no clue how to photograph and post something....or he's the biggest liar ever to come down the forum pike.

I do enjoy how this is all about pleasing me however. I really do get inside the empty heads around here.
Try as he may with his dodgy, corny, and poor writing though, redietz continually looks the other way whenever he's been asked to identify himself to go along with whatever name/accolades he's constantly claiming. Nobody knows if he's simply assuming the name of some hero of his, as groupies of his type would readily do. Which, of course, is why he put in the effort to solicit business from me until, that is, he got exposed.

Any wonder why his wife took the easy way out?

[mickeycrimm]

Alan-I can't fathom why you or Rob even spend the time answering these people. All these posts are doing is attracting more scum like Elaine who hide in the dark just licking their chops to have a chance to add delusion and rift to common sense. I only come back occasionally to see if anyone's brave enough to accept Rob's original challenge without trying to squirm out of it. Naturally. the only way to weasel out is to start foolishness.

Sling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.

[Elaine M]

Mr and Mrs Singer (#s 2 and 3) going for a nice early morning walk

[mickeycrimm]

Any wonder why his wife took the easy way out?

Only a thoroughly despicable human being would needle someone about their deceased wife. Robert Harry Argentino (Rob Singer) relishes in it. It demonstrates just how deranged and evil Argentino is. To say his character is bad is a severe understatement. He is the lowest of the low. No redeemable qualities. There are no boundaries as to how low he will stoop. Just this characteristic alone demonstrates that Argentino (Singer) has zero credibility in anything he writes.

[Alan Mendelson]

I'm sorry redietz has to read the crap Rob often posts. I've also been a victim of Rob. Unfortunately we've had an absentee owner/moderator here and now it's getting worse. Formerly banned participants are back and Rob should have been reigned in.

[Elaine M]

Any wonder why his wife took the easy way out?

Only a thoroughly despicable human being would needle someone about their deceased wife. Robert Harry Argentino (Rob Singer) relishes in it. It demonstrates just how deranged and evil Argentino is. To say his character is bad is a severe understatement. He is the lowest of the low. No redeemable qualities. There are no boundaries as to how low he will stoop. Just this characteristic alone demonstrates that Argentino (Singer) has zero credibility in anything he writes.

100% true...and then you have coward idiots like Betty, Faceshot and Mendelputz defending and endorsing him

[MisterV]

I'm sorry redietz has to read the crap Rob often posts. I've also been a victim of Rob. Unfortunately we've had an absentee owner/moderator here and now it's getting worse. Formerly banned participants are back and Rob should have been reigned in.

Shit seeks its own level in a cesspool.

The turds that float to the top are just the lightest weight.

[slingshot]

Alan-I can't fathom why you or Rob even spend the time answering these people. All these posts are doing is attracting more scum like Elaine who hide in the dark just licking their chops to have a chance to add delusion and rift to common sense. I only come back occasionally to see if anyone's brave enough to accept Rob's original challenge without trying to squirm out of it. Naturally. the only way to weasel out is to start foolishness.

Sling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.

Well, you had me looking. anyway. I couldn't find Kim Lee accepting his original challenge.

[mickeycrimm]

Alan-I can't fathom why you or Rob even spend the time answering these people. All these posts are doing is attracting more scum like Elaine who hide in the dark just licking their chops to have a chance to add delusion and rift to common sense. I only come back occasionally to see if anyone's brave enough to accept Rob's original challenge without trying to squirm out of it. Naturally. the only way to weasel out is to start foolishness.

Sling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.

Well, you had me looking. anyway. I couldn't find Kim Lee accepting his original challenge.

You can't hide behind that bullshit. You couldn't find it because you don't want to find it. Rob, who in an earlier post said he thinks the one that makes the challenge should put money in escrow first. That was over Dan making a counter offer. When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him. Rob made the challenge, Kim Lee accepted. Rob should put his money in escrow first. That's the kind of bullshit your fucking hero plays. Go suck his dick.

[coach belly]

When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him.

In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.

When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.

When you play table games, you put your money on the table.

When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.

When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.

If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.

Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.

It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.

Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.

[Rob.Singer]

Here's the truth Mickey, since you can't handle it.

Kim jumped in with zero terms of his bet, and he made it clear he wanted nothing to do with an escrow. As soon as I did his thinking for him he wandered away, which is why I'm giving him another chance when my bet goes public in LV.

Mickey SOOO needs an idol in all this as he anonymously shouts insults from the sidelines. And he'll be the first one to "rewrite history" with "Rob changed the bet (whimper whimper)" the moment after his fabled ap pals fizzle out again.

[Half Smoke]

.................................................. .............................................



this is kind of interesting to me; it's from an N.I.H. funded study on compulsive gambling. N.I.H. (The National Institutes of Health) is probably the most respected medical organization in the world.
from the study:

"Two common classes of distortion that have been widely studied in the laboratory are the illusion of control and the gambler's fallacy. The illusion of control refers to irrelevant features of a game that create a sense that one is developing some kind of skill over an outcome that is in fact determined by chance alone. Gamblers are more risky and more confident when they can make an irrelevant choice or when they can exert instrumental action (e.g., throwing dice.)

The gambler's fallacy occurs when observing sequences of random outcomes, like coin tosses or red/black outcomes in roulette. Following a run of the same outcome (e.g., four successive roulette spins landing on red), players typically predict that the other outcome (i.e., black) will occur next. Most psychological accounts of the gambler's fallacy refer to the law of small numbers, that people expect small fragments from a distribution to be representative of the distribution itself, whereas in reality, runs and streaks are fairly common in random sequences. The gambler's fallacy is described in choosing lottery numbers and in casino data for roulette. As preliminary evidence that this effect is linked to gambling disorder, a higher level of gambling distortions in students predicted gambler's fallacy decisions, and at-risk gamblers preferred a slot machine simulation that delivered more “clumpy” outcomes"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285202/

[mickeycrimm]

When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him.

In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.

When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.

When you play table games, you put your money on the table.

When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.

When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.

If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.

Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.

It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.

Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.

When Singer says the one that makes the challenge should put his money in escrow first it means THE ONE THAT MAKES THE CHALLENGE SHOULD PUT HIS MONEY IN ESCROW FIRST. Rob made the challenge. He got called. He is the ONE WHO IS OBLIGATED TO PUT HIS MONEY IN ESCROW FIRST.

Petunia, you are just jealous because Rob has been packing Sling up the ass lately. Don't worry. He'll get back around to you. I'll bet you squeal like a pig too.

[mickeycrimm]

Here's the truth Mickey, since you can't handle it.

Kim jumped in with zero terms of his bet, and he made it clear he wanted nothing to do with an escrow. As soon as I did his thinking for him he wandered away, which is why I'm giving him another chance when my bet goes public in LV.

Mickey SOOO needs an idol in all this as he anonymously shouts insults from the sidelines. And he'll be the first one to "rewrite history" with "Rob changed the bet (whimper whimper)" the moment after his fabled ap pals fizzle out again.

No, you made the bet, bitch. He accepted. You're a dirty little coward that won't take the bet that you made. You carry a portable tap dance floor with you everywhere you go:

[monet]

Portable Tap Dance Floor! LOL! The powers that be will truly sell anything to anyone.

[slingshot]

Awww,phooey. I thought this time maybe things would be different. I'll just go back to making a few bucks and enjoying my free stuff with artt-a far less complicated strategy. So go ahead with all your filthy assumptions about me as a sock puppet. Never mind that I've actually played the strategy. I'll check back in later to probably the same stuff. Just a waste of one's time here.

[Deech]

When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him.

In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.

When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.

When you play table games, you put your money on the table.

When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.

When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.

If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.

Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.

It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.

Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.

Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.


For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.

Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.


This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.

[slingshot]

When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him.

In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.

When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.

When you play table games, you put your money on the table.

When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.

When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.

If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.

Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.

It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.

Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.

Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.


For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.

Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.


This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.

THIS is the Kim Lee acceptance? When I saw the opening paragraph, I thought it was on! Then comes the second paragraph. Really? Let me join in with Alan and say I see 18 ho,ho,ho's in a row!

[mickeycrimm]

In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.

When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.

When you play table games, you put your money on the table.

When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.

When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.

If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.

Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.

It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.

Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.

Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.


For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.

Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.


This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.

THIS is the Kim Lee acceptance? When I saw the opening paragraph, I thought it was on! Then comes the second paragraph. Really? Let me join in with Alan and say I see 18 ho,ho,ho's in a row!

When God said brains you thought he said rain and ran for cover. The 1st paragraph was written by Kim Lee. The 2nd paragraph was written by your lover, Rob Singer.