Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
No corroboration?

She disclosed details of the event to her therapist many years ago, long before "Cry baby Kavanaugh" was in the public eye.

As for him being a douche: I believe her testimony: he lied, not just about trying to fuck her but about his drinking history and alleged celibacy.

I wouldn't hire him to mow my lawn, much less pass judgment, and it's not just me: lots of leading lights in the legal profession think he shoudn't be confirmed due to character deficiencies.

Now to watch the payback unfold.
No corroboration. Her “witnesses” all deny her account. The therapist? As far I know, we don’t know what was in the therapist’s notes because they wouldn’t release them. The problem V, is that her narrative kept changing. One to the therapist, one to Feinstein, and one to the WaPost.