Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 292

Thread: Rob Singer containment thread

  1. #181
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by Dankyone View Post
    Un effing believeable. The world’s biggest ploppy doesn’t recognize a professional poker player as a gaming authority.
    No. Sorry.

    Nor do I recognize every professional Uber driver as a motoring authority.
    Well, I would take traffic and route advice from a Uber driver, who's living depends on getting from place to place efficiently, where as you seem to want to take your traffic tips from a guy who drives his house from place to place.

  2. #182
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    If a player can win one time at an -EV game why can't he win a second time? And a third? And a fourth? By the way Rob has NEVER claimed to win every time he plays.
    Alan if you truly believe this, then you should never again set foot in a casino again.
    Do you ever stop to read what you wrote before actually posting it? What kind of a nonsensical remark was this?

    Sometimes you argue like a fifth grader.

  3. #183
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by Dankyone View Post
    Un effing believeable. The world’s biggest ploppy doesn’t recognize a professional poker player as a gaming authority.
    No. Sorry.

    Nor do I recognize every professional Uber driver as a motoring authority.
    Well, I would take traffic and route advice from a Uber driver, who's living depends on getting from place to place efficiently, where as you seem to want to take your traffic tips from a guy who drives his house from place to place.
    Thank you fifth grader. We're done.

  4. #184
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickey anyone can walk into a legal forms store, buy a "lease form" and fill it out and sign it with bogus names.
    Can anyone get a property management company to lie for them? Create a folder with my leases in it?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #185
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickey anyone can walk into a legal forms store, buy a "lease form" and fill it out and sign it with bogus names.
    Can anyone get a property management company to lie for them? Create a folder with my leases in it?
    Mickey don't be naive. In some states anyone can walk into a print shop and buy a notary stamp with their name on it. The only reason you can't do it in Calif is because in 1988 while I was working at FOX I did an investigation called "drive by fraud." Scammers would drive by a house, take down the STREET ADDRESS and a quick description of the property, and then using a notary stamp FILE A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP and take a mortgage on the hiuse. My investigation changed the law in California so that only REAL notaries could get a notary stamp. I testified before the legislature to get the law passed.

  6. #186

  7. #187
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    I think I could buy a California stamp online.

    https://www.acornsales.com/notary-se...RoCPXUQAvD_BwE
    Thanks for posting. Of course the California State Law only applies to California businesses, such as printer shops where stamps are made.

    In 1988 when the law was passed there was no Internet.

    Add online sites like this to the problem we all face for fraud and identity theft.

  8. #188
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickey anyone can walk into a legal forms store, buy a "lease form" and fill it out and sign it with bogus names.
    Can anyone get a property management company to lie for them? Create a folder with my leases in it?
    Mickey don't be naive. In some states anyone can walk into a print shop and buy a notary stamp with their name on it. The only reason you can't do it in Calif is because in 1988 while I was working at FOX I did an investigation called "drive by fraud." Scammers would drive by a house, take down the STREET ADDRESS and a quick description of the property, and then using a notary stamp FILE A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP and take a mortgage on the hiuse. My investigation changed the law in California so that only REAL notaries could get a notary stamp. I testified before the legislature to get the law passed.
    So how about I take Mr. Dung right into the offices of this large property management company and request a copy of my lease? My point, Alan, is Dung is lying out his ass making shit up about me just like Robocchio. He's a punk.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #189
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    honestly, I have never hit a signer
    How much was the largest individual ticket you cashed out? Did you receive any W2-G's? Did they do any CTR's? Did they ask for your ss#?
    Redietz has posted earlier that he bets foreign books to avoid taxes. I'm sure he's never given a social security number to a foreign book. I doubt any foreign book ever gave him a W2G.

    I'm surprised redietz made the comment considering that he posts using his real name.

    See, Mr. Mendelson, this is why people consider you a shyster.

    Obviously you paraphrased what I posted, and then stated a speculative and false conclusion based on your paraphrasing. LOL. The easy way to identify a "language shyster" in this case is that you did not include the original posting of mine in a quote, because that would demonstrate that your paraphrasing was inaccurate.

    This is something that would be flagged with an "F" in any introductory journalism class. So I have to assume your clumsy attempt is purposeful, you being an intrepid reporter and all.

  10. #190
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post

    Apparently he's made wagers large enough at US casinos to require ID.



    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    When making or cashing reasonably sizeable futures wagers.
    I asked whether he has ever cashed tickets sizable enough to generate a CTR.

    I'm assuming that US casinos are required to issue CTRs for both wagers and payouts $10K or greater, but I'm not sure so that's why I am asking.
    Coach, you seem like a curious boy. I'm surprised that you haven't been asking Argentino similar questions, given that his storylines seem a tad shakier than mine. Go ahead, coach, see if you can muster up some fair and balanced questioning here. You can do it. You're a big boy.

  11. #191
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    So how about I take Mr. Dung right into the offices of this large property management company and request a copy of my lease? My point, Alan, is Dung is lying out his ass making shit up about me just like Robocchio. He's a punk.
    Well, it looks as if Mr. Crimm's alligator mouth has finally met his hummingbird ass. Last week, it was KJ's big meltdown. Redietz grows ever more anxiety ridden. Stay tuned.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  12. #192
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    It's not just horses. But a bet that pays 300 to 1 or better requires a W2G which includes having a social security number. I have to check the $ threshold amount but a $5 Fire Bet at craps hitting all 6 requires a W2G.

    While I don't bet sports I'm guessing there must be some bets that pay 300 to 1 or better outside of horses????

    LOL. They have to win.

    And who in his right mind would play a 300-1 future with a tax burden when you could bet it offshore?

    Oh wait, that's right. Parlay cards. You'd get W2Gs for parlay cards. Of course, who in his right mind would play parlay cards with 300-1 odds, risking a tax burden? Wouldn't you just break up the lineup and play separate cards to get under the 300-1? Probably not if you're playing parlays to begin with, eh?

    I don't know much about video poker, and nothing about craps. It is truly frightening when you two start asking questions regarding something I actually know a bit about. You come across as doofuses.

    Mr. Mendelson coming to Rob's defense. Boy, you two need some remedial gambling work. Or maybe just remedial work in general.

    I hear Opportunity Village is hiring. It's Billy Walters' favorite charity.
    I have to provide a quote of myself to demonstrate Mr. Mendelson's purposeful use of inaccurate paraphrasing. Boy, that is bad journalism, Mr. Mendelson. Somebody doesn't say something, but you paraphrase and say they did. Tsk, tsk.


    If you'll notice, I said (and I'm accurately paraphrasing here, to highlight how it should be done for Mr. Mendelson's professional benefit) who in his right mind would play a 300-1 future with a tax burden when you could bet it offshore? I stand by that.

    Now here's the kicker, Mr. Mendelson. Pay close attention now. To have a tax burden, one must win the 300-1 future at the offshore. Why don't you be a good intrepid reporter, do the research, and figure out how many college basketball, college football, NBA, NFL, MLB, college baseball, women's college hoops, WNBA, NHL, or college hockey teams won titles at 300-1 or more in the last decade?


    This may require more than one google search, so take your time.

  13. #193
    I think Alan, Rob, myself, and a few others should just stop posting on this site. Then we should sit back and just watch the site eventually vanish.

    Of course the assholes Kiwlj, Redditz, Mickey, and the other 4 or 5 alleged Ap's will come out with guns a blazing and post like crazy. But truthfully they have nothing to say and would only fade away. What are they going to talk about? Let's face it, how many people even phony AP's could take much more of Kiwlj's gambling fairy tales, or try to figure out what Redditz is saying while communicating with earth from Saturn? How many more pictures of unknown casinos scattered all over the country in places no one even knew existed does one want to look at? (goggle has a lot more details if anyone is really interested in visiting one of these shitholes)

    Without Alan and Rob back and forth arguments, how much other content is actually on this site? I'm up for the challenge, hope the others are also.

  14. #194
    I like how Mickey tries to talk his way out of the difference between 198% and 51% in the craps play thread. The other guy did a computer simulation, while Mickey stands around to talk about no one knowing the pure math of the bet.

    Looks like Crimm is as dead as KJ in the believability department.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  15. #195
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    I like how Mickey tries to talk his way out of the difference between 198% and 51% in the craps play thread. The other guy did a computer simulation, while Mickey stands around to talk about no one knowing the pure math of the bet. Looks like Crimm is as dead as KJ in the believability department.
    I didn't do the math for YOUR benefit because you are so braindead you are beyond help. One thing is certain, you are incapable of coming up with the correct answer yourself. You have to rely on others. So you are in a quandary as to who is right, Stickman or me.

    First, when Stickman said 51% edge that meant a 151% return. All Stickman did with the simulation is make an estimate because he didn't know the exact math to use, and he couldn't punch the exact numbers into the simulation.If you think I'm wrong here's your chance to rub my nose in it. There are plenty of math sites on the internet where you can ask and get answers by college math professors. Here is the question to ask:

    What is the probability of rolling the dice exactly 13 times without producing a 7?

    Report back what these math professors told you.

    And I'll refine my answer on the 198% since I used a rounded number the first time.

    10.7 X 50 = a total wager of $535
    Payoff is $527.51 (98.6% of $535) + $500 = $1027.51
    $1027.51 divided by the total wager, $535, = 192%.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  16. #196
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I'm surprised that you haven't been asking Argentino similar questions...see if you can muster up some fair and balanced questioning here. You can do it.
    I've already done it...I asked you the same questions that another member asked of Singer earlier.

    Isn't that fair and balanced?

    Does your deflection affirm that you have cashed a winning ticket at US casinos valued at $10K or greater?

  17. #197
    Funny stuff again. Kew's becoming so unnerved over this that he's saying Alan takes "traffic advice" from me. Of course, because he wants to believe I drive an RV between my houses. Dopey----that's why I have TWO RV's!

    While it's an ongoing joy watching the anonymous clowns from WoV trying to claim Dan is some type of "gaming authority" because he speaks in the theoretical, one cannot underestimate the entertainment value of kew as he gets rattled beyond belief! I just wish I were there at this time. I've never seen a guy with one of those lithps studder.

  18. #198
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    I like how Mickey tries to talk his way out of the difference between 198% and 51% in the craps play thread. The other guy did a computer simulation, while Mickey stands around to talk about no one knowing the pure math of the bet. Looks like Crimm is as dead as KJ in the believability department.
    I didn't do the math for YOUR benefit because you are so braindead you are beyond help. One thing is certain, you are incapable of coming up with the correct answer yourself. You have to rely on others. So you are in a quandary as to who is right, Stickman or me.
    First off, "pure math" already refers to something more specific than the way you used the term.

    Pure mathematics explores the boundary of mathematics and pure reason. It has been described as "that part of mathematical activity that is done without explicit or immediate consideration of direct application," although what is "pure" in one era often becomes applied later. https://www.google.ca/search?q=pure+...hrome&ie=UTF-8
    Secondly, I didn't even read this promotion's details. I have very little interest in or time for gambling math per se. At any rate, gambling math doesn't call for a lot of if any rigorous mathematical proof or debate.

    Thirdly, aren't computer simulations for engineering, math, or whatever, supposed to be about not being able to (easily) "punch in the exact numbers"? Like for generating the first million prime numbers to check out some of the longstanding unsolved conjectures and theorems about primes? Did you really mean only that the guy who did the simulation didn't properly set it up, he misunderstood that promotion's details, and/or he is a poor computer programmer?

    All Stickman did with the simulation is make an estimate because he didn't know the exact math to use, and he couldn't punch the exact numbers into the simulation.
    There are plenty of math sites on the internet where you can ask and get answers by college math professors
    Then why do you continue to search for others to prove things out here? Why does anyone have to go to Montana to see you play? To see where you live? To go to Vegas to read stuff going back forty years on Red, that only he seems to be in possession of? And on and on. Post up your own proofs, and simple evidence of what you claim to do. Find something by someone with a real name in the gambling industry who writes that slot machines offer a high-level income. Ask the guy who did the simulation to show you his code. Find out his side of the story. Have him post any corrections and other edits to his casino internet site.

    Still waiting just to hear about how poker EV is different from that of blackjack, and, hence, how the long-run distributions differ in comparison; how no one has to lose at blackjack; how KJ "blows through" a deck or two playing heads-ups, five times a day to play a hundred thousand hands a year, but still manages to count one or two more tables. If you want to continue to endorse KJ, you have to back up also what you do and don't write about it. And, how it was that you wrote on the WoV that you lived out of a hotel at the corner of such and such somewhere in Montana.

    You skirt the comments and questions that you, apparently, can't acknowledge and truthfully reply to other than with vague isolated and idiotic responses such as "brain-dead and beyond help".

    Here is the question to ask: What is the probability of rolling the dice exactly 13 times without producing a 7?
    Fine. If that's all there is to it, then ask the Wizard. You should have had the one precise answer a long time ago.
    Last edited by Bill Yung; 11-14-2018 at 08:52 AM.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  19. #199
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    See, Mr. Mendelson, this is why people consider you a shyster.

    Obviously you paraphrased what I posted, and then stated a speculative and false conclusion based on your paraphrasing.
    This is one of hundreds of examples of Alan Mendelson acting like a shyster. Hundreds (plural)! Dishonest, sneaky, conniving, manipulating, intentionally twisting words. This IS Alan Mendelson and Shyster very accurately describes him.

    As a matter of fact, his attempt to suggest that my use of the word has some sort of anti-Semitic meaning, when knew damn right well, it didn't and I was not using it in such a manner, was in itself a shyster (dishonest) move. Shyster is a perfect description of Alan Mendelson and his behavior on this site.

  20. #200
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Ask the guy who did the simulation to show you his code. Find out his side of the story. Have him post any corrections and other edits to his casino internet site.
    Jerry “Stickman” is an expert in craps, blackjack and video poker and advantage slot machine play. He is a regular contributor to top gaming magazines. He authored the video poker section of Everything Casino Poker: Get the Edge at Video Poker, Texas Hold'em, Omaha Hi-Lo, and Pai Gow Poker! You can contact Jerry “Stickman” at stickmanjerry@aol.com
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The WoV Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 10012
    Last Post: 03-24-2024, 11:31 AM
  2. Replies: 84
    Last Post: 11-29-2023, 05:55 PM
  3. The Genealogy Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 04-27-2018, 06:29 AM
  4. A thread for losses.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-26-2014, 02:01 AM
  5. The Kicker Thread
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 02:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •