Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 101 to 113 of 113

Thread: alan's epic craps roll

  1. #101
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Don't forget. These fools are playing these negative games sub-optimally! No way in hell they're getting back more than 100% when they play at a 96% rate. Best they can do is find suckers like Slingshot to buy into this garbage. Casinos love these fools!!! hahahahahaha.....
    Looks like you deleted 6,000 posts of the same thing over at the Wizard's, came crawling back, and got banned from there before you had the chance to rinse and repeat.

    Now we have to hear it.
    True addicts are incredibly credible. Gambling is just another word for keep losing. Nothing "sweeter" than watching people try to make something out of an internet gambling site. A bozo's set of bozos whether system or advantage players. Both types to whichever degree could make billions in the markets if any of that stuff actually worked. It's great to be a spectator of gambling, and not to have one leg and arm stuck in the "grave" like the cunts, cowards and crackpots here. Forever 57.

  2. #102
    You know when you're getting to two-bit Mickey. LOL

  3. #103
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Don't forget. These fools are playing these negative games sub-optimally! No way in hell they're getting back more than 100% when they play at a 96% rate. Best they can do is find suckers like Slingshot to buy into this garbage. Casinos love these fools!!! hahahahahaha.....
    Looks like you deleted 6,000 posts of the same thing over at the Wizard's, came crawling back, and got banned from there before you had the chance to rinse and repeat.

    Now we have to hear it.
    Hey asswipe...I deleted nothing there as, I'm not now, nor have I EVER been a member there. Keep up the fun though fucknut.

  4. #104
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by Moses [/QUOTE

    Good point. But then, why are non APs on gambling forums?
    I can’t speak for anyone else, but I asked someone a gaming question in a casino, and he directed me to WOO. I didn’t even know such a website existed.

    After reading it for a while I realized how much nonsense was being exchanged, and I started to question the nonsense and didn’t last long.

    Of course, that experience led to another site, and then another. Apparently, it’s the same group of alleged AP’s making their rounds telling everyone how successful they are beating casino games up for profits and endless years, at the same time going unnoticed.

    The arguments are hilarious and the posts are more like a comedy show that never ends. If I’m busy and have to go while reading the comedy show, I’ll even write the page down I’m on at the moment to make sure I don’t miss a laugh later.
    OK here's what I don't get? And let's stay with the example of Mike Shackleford. So you guys, who I classify as "haters", are retired from whatever careers you had. You claim highend high paying careers that provided you with a wonderful retirement. Ok, so be it. So what do you (that is a plural you) care about Mike Shackleford?

    I have my own issues with Shack, as everyone knows, based on how he runs his forum. But you guys, although I guess most of you have been banned at WoV, your issues don't seem to be with that area (your banning or how shackleford runs his forum). Your issue seems to be Shackleford as an AP and the fact that he runs a math based gambling forum.

    I don't know that much about Shacklefords gambling and AP activity. Nor care all that much. He has proven he is a uniquely qualified gambling math expert. I hope he has and continues to put that expertise to use beating the casinos, but whether he does or not...who cares? That is his decision. Neither do I care about whatever that investment thing is/was that went bad in Cyprus (is that where it was?) Who cares? What does that have to do with anything? What's the other thing...oh yeah, the "tin cup" deal. Until this online casino group came along and bought out Woo/WoV, and later other sites like BJ21 and blackjackinfo, no one knew there was that financial kind of possibility. Up until that time, these sites operated on advertising revenue and/ or a few went the subscription route as BJ21 did. Neither made anyone rich as near as I can tell, just offset operating expenses maybe showing a small profit.

    So pre-this casino group coming along, Mike was looking for a way to offset operating expenses at his forums. And by the way the finances of the forum were separate from his personal finances. You jackwads choose to ignore that. So it would seem the ads on the site, were not cutting it and Shackleford was considering some sort of subscription fee (similar to BJ21). But before he went to that, he decided to see if any of the members that use and value the forum wanted to voluntarily contribute to offsetting the costs of the forum. Big deal. IMO, not a sound decision and in hindsight made his look a little silly...gave fuel to the haters.

    But what the fuck is all that hate about? How is Shackleford, his forums and sites, whatever he claims as AP success (which I don't hear him talk about much) effect you guys and your (alleged) million dollar pensions? As always you can choose not to believe any of it. But the level of hate that you clowns have and have continued to have for years, about someone and something that has no effect on your life (as you tell it) just doesn't add up.

    There is something else going on here. And anyone with half a brain can see it. That level of hate is about one thing and one thing only....jealousy. You guys aren't these successful whatever with these million dollars retirements....if you were, you would be out enjoying your retirements. But your not...you engage in years long hate and attacks. That tells me you clowns are failed gamblers. Losing gamblers. Sure you are retired now, with whatever retirement you have (and I hope it is substantial), but probably a lot less substantial that you guys claim and probably Social Security is a big part of that retirement plan (nothing wrong with that).

    But what is wrong is that you take your jealousy and hate and direct it at Mike Shackleford and other AP's who have registered any kind of success playing at the casinos. Just stop you very small people. Take some responsibility for yourselves. If you are bitter that you lost too much money at the casinos during your lifetime, be angry and bitter with yourself. No one twisted your arm. Stop taking your bitterness out on everyone else. Just grow the Fuck up!


    Geez, I hate it when I am forced to defend Shacky, who I have my own issues with. But it is the perfect example of ALL the hate and attacks and what that is all about. A few bitter, old guys (sorry Mr V but it's true in this case) angry at themselves, so they attack those who have had some success where they have failed. Very small human beings.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 11-04-2018 at 09:21 AM.

  5. #105
    Except for Alan, he may be a small minded individual, but he's the Hebrew Hammer when it comes to being a "Large" man.

    And no KJ, I don't think you give a damn about the size of Alan's junk. I give you far more credit than that.

  6. #106
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Except for Alan, he may be a small minded individual, but he's the Hebrew Hammer when it comes to being a "Large" man.

    And no KJ, I don't think you give a damn about the size of Alan's junk. I give you far more credit than that.
    Umm...No I don't. I am wondering why you seem to.

  7. #107
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Boz is jealous that Alan can STILL charm and marry just about any women he chooses.
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Except for Alan, he may be a small minded individual, but he's the Hebrew Hammer when it comes to being a "Large" man.

    And no KJ, I don't think you give a damn about the size of Alan's junk. I give you far more credit than that.
    TMI. But it's good to know Alan was the guy who found the bottle on the beach with a Jeannie in it.

  8. #108
    Wow Kewlj, you hit bottom and really have nothing else to say.

  9. #109
    Platinum
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Stumptown
    Posts
    1,881
    KJ, I've no real issue with the wiz with one exception: I think it was pretty shitty of him to go on to his site as he did and pass the tin cup, hitting members up for money, while at the same time he knew he had a muti-million dollar sale of WoO in the pipeline.

    He did it knowing that many long-time posters would heed the call, out of "friendship."

    Some friend.
    What, Me Worry?

  10. #110
    The same pretty stupid and made-up complaint you make whenever people get too close to the Shack. Would be the least of Shack's idiocy and corruption.

    Ooh, that bad Mr. Shack, he passed the hat. Lol.
    True addicts are incredibly credible. Gambling is just another word for keep losing. Nothing "sweeter" than watching people try to make something out of an internet gambling site. A bozo's set of bozos whether system or advantage players. Both types to whichever degree could make billions in the markets if any of that stuff actually worked. It's great to be a spectator of gambling, and not to have one leg and arm stuck in the "grave" like the cunts, cowards and crackpots here. Forever 57.

  11. #111
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    KJ, I've no real issue with the wiz with one exception: I think it was pretty shitty of him to go on to his site as he did and pass the tin cup, hitting members up for money, while at the same time he knew he had a muti-million dollar sale of WoO in the pipeline.

    He did it knowing that many long-time posters would heed the call, out of "friendship."

    Some friend.
    I don't remember the details MrV. How long after Mike asked for donations was the sale announced? I also though he offered to refund any money that had been donated, no?

    Not that it matters to me, I am not here to defend Mike.

    "Friendship" in regards to Mike Shackleford. Let me see...yeah, I'll make a comment on that one. If I recall, Shackleford chose sides in a feud based on "friendship". Banned a long time positively contributing member because "he owed a friend a favor". And by the way this "friend" that Shacky did all this for: Hadn't participated at WoV in 5 years and publicly gave a reason why...."because he didn't trust Mike due to the venetian thing". And finally, since this incident, this so called "friend" again stopped posting at WoV, proving his whole intention was about using Mike.


    So, NO, I don't think Michael Shackleford has a clue about friendship.

  12. #112
    One curious thing I've wondered about. Shack was banned from Rubin's blackjack ball because of his employment at the Venetian. But yet the other tackling dummy here, Dancer, who also is an agent of casinos (and a very sweaty one at that), is invited every year. That I don't get.

  13. #113
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Don't forget. These fools are playing these negative games sub-optimally! No way in hell they're getting back more than 100% when they play at a 96% rate. Best they can do is find suckers like Slingshot to buy into this garbage. Casinos love these fools!!! hahahahahaha.....
    Looks like you deleted 6,000 posts of the same thing over at the Wizard's, came crawling back, and got banned from there before you had the chance to rinse and repeat.

    Now we have to hear it.
    Hey asswipe...I deleted nothing there as, I'm not now, nor have I EVER been a member there. Keep up the fun though fucknut.
    I must have you confused with the only other guy on the internet who used to ring up Shack's forum with all the live details.

    Last time we heard from him over there, the guy was beside himself about having won all of $180, and eating a sub. The end of another long day, I guess.

    Nah, couldn't be you. But you sound just like him. That guy from GreekTown casino in Michigan. KJ said you make hundreds of thousands a year.
    True addicts are incredibly credible. Gambling is just another word for keep losing. Nothing "sweeter" than watching people try to make something out of an internet gambling site. A bozo's set of bozos whether system or advantage players. Both types to whichever degree could make billions in the markets if any of that stuff actually worked. It's great to be a spectator of gambling, and not to have one leg and arm stuck in the "grave" like the cunts, cowards and crackpots here. Forever 57.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. big craps roll
    By regnis in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-23-2016, 01:52 PM
  2. Should your bets work during the come out roll in craps?
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-09-2015, 10:05 AM
  3. Bank roll
    By whodat in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-18-2015, 03:15 PM
  4. Best Roll Of My Life
    By RoeIncarnate in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2015, 06:12 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-10-2013, 01:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •