Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 113

Thread: alan's epic craps roll

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    "The Long Term" is a term that's only has two simple applications: a casino, and any casino game or machine.

    Any foolish interpretation by so-called "AP's" that define the long term as the play throughout a person's lifetime is just that: foolish. It is just another deflection by these confused and misguided people that contributes to their justification for playing far more often than they know they should. Actually, it's pathetic.
    No Rob (or whatever your name is), the long-term is real. What is foolish is you thinking you can achieve some short-term result, which is nothing more than variance or fluctuation, and duplicate that over and over, completely contrary to the mathematics involved.

    That is not only foolish, but pathetic. And what is really pathetic, is that I have come to believe that you don't even believe that. It is just part of your scam or agenda or whatever it is that you are doing.
    What I'm doing kew is what I've done for a long time: expose ap-bs. If any of you had any relationship with the truth, you wouldn't need to parade around on internet forums making unsubstantiated gambling claims as anonymous cowards. But this is how the little people exist.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    "The Long Term" is a term that's only has two simple applications: a casino, and any casino game or machine.

    Any foolish interpretation by so-called "AP's" that define the long term as the play throughout a person's lifetime is just that: foolish. It is just another deflection by these confused and misguided people that contributes to their justification for playing far more often than they know they should. Actually, it's pathetic.
    No Rob (or whatever your name is), the long-term is real. What is foolish is you thinking you can achieve some short-term result, which is nothing more than variance or fluctuation, and duplicate that over and over, completely contrary to the mathematics involved.

    That is not only foolish, but pathetic. And what is really pathetic, is that I have come to believe that you don't even believe that. It is just part of your scam or agenda or whatever it is that you are doing.
    What I'm doing kew is what I've done for a long time: expose ap-bs. If any of you had any relationship with the truth, you wouldn't need to parade around on internet forums making unsubstantiated gambling claims as anonymous cowards. But this is how the little people exist.
    Robocchio, you've been making unsubstantiated claims for 20 years. When are you going to prove your bullshit.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    "The Long Term" is a term that's only has two simple applications: a casino, and any casino game or machine.

    Any foolish interpretation by so-called "AP's" that define the long term as the play throughout a person's lifetime is just that: foolish. It is just another deflection by these confused and misguided people that contributes to their justification for playing far more often than they know they should. Actually, it's pathetic.
    I think a better term to use: variants. There are no AP's. They're Variants!!

  4. #24
    Looks like alan doesn't want to comment on Singer's claim.

    Odd; he usually bends over backward to have even a glimmer of the spotlight shine on him.

    Oh well, I guess it was a bunch of baloney.
    Last edited by MisterV; 10-29-2018 at 05:15 PM.
    What, Me Worry?

  5. #25
    There was nothing inaccurate about what Rob wrote, V. But your original post to start this thread was wrong. Go back and look again at what Rob wrote.

  6. #26
    Oh.

    I looked briefly for his post, didn't find it, and posted based on my memory.

    So, you DIDN'T have an "epic craps roll?"
    What, Me Worry?

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    "The Long Term" is a term that's only has two simple applications: a casino, and any casino game or machine.

    Any foolish interpretation by so-called "AP's" that define the long term as the play throughout a person's lifetime is just that: foolish. It is just another deflection by these confused and misguided people that contributes to their justification for playing far more often than they know they should. Actually, it's pathetic.
    No Rob (or whatever your name is), the long-term is real. What is foolish is you thinking you can achieve some short-term result, which is nothing more than variance or fluctuation, and duplicate that over and over, completely contrary to the mathematics involved.

    That is not only foolish, but pathetic. And what is really pathetic, is that I have come to believe that you don't even believe that. It is just part of your scam or agenda or whatever it is that you are doing.
    What I'm doing kew is what I've done for a long time: expose ap-bs. If any of you had any relationship with the truth, you wouldn't need to parade around on internet forums making unsubstantiated gambling claims as anonymous cowards. But this is how the little people exist.
    Always good to have those bs-exposers at work.

    Speaking of which, I finally got around to writing to the folks at G2E regarding a poster here who claimed he was scheduled to chair a roundtable at the 2017 G2E. I guess if anyone wishes to confess to some "unsubstantiated gambling claims," now might be the time.

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I guess if anyone wishes to confess to some "unsubstantiated gambling claims," now might be the time.
    I thought I saw eighteen yos rolled in a row, but I was high on acid at the time.
    What, Me Worry?

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    There was nothing inaccurate about what Rob wrote, V. But your original post to start this thread was wrong. Go back and look again at what Rob wrote.
    C'mon, Alan. Tell us what the rush you got was like when the dice were passing. You know, that euphoria you felt. You must have felt like the strongest man alive.

    Then tell us what it was like when the dice quit passing and you crashed and burned blowing all the money back plus the payment money to your kid. The sorrow you felt. Did you feel like killing yourself?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    C'mon, Alan. Tell us what the rush you got was like when the dice were passing. You know, that euphoria you felt. You must have felt like the strongest man alive.

    Then tell us what it was like when the dice quit passing and you crashed and burned blowing all the money back plus the payment money to your kid. The sorrow you felt. Did you feel like killing yourself?
    That would be like finding the fine-structure constant was 1 / 127 just after the "big bang" instead of 1 / 137 (all along). Bummer.

    Now if I could only figure out what the heck the opposite of that value is supposed to be, and stick a number to it. Something to sleep on.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    C'mon, Alan. Tell us what the rush you got was like when the dice were passing. You know, that euphoria you felt. You must have felt like the strongest man alive.

    Then tell us what it was like when the dice quit passing and you crashed and burned blowing all the money back plus the payment money to your kid. The sorrow you felt. Did you feel like killing yourself?
    That would be like finding the fine-structure constant was 1 / 127 just after the "big bang" instead of 1 / 137 (all along). Bummer.

    Now if I could only figure out what the heck the opposite of that value is supposed to be, and stick a number to it. Something to sleep on.
    You no doubt go through the same ruminations at baccarat as Alan does at craps. From euphoria to crest fallen. And back and forth. No wonder you and Alan are so dizzy. But at least he doesn't psychobabble.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  12. #32
    Ya, and call it the "Garnabby constant".
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Oh.

    I looked briefly for his post, didn't find it, and posted based on my memory.

    So, you DIDN'T have an "epic craps roll?"
    I did not have "an epic craps roll." You trolled me again. You also included another reference to the 18 yos in an additional attempt to belittle me in true troll fashion.

    Find what Rob wrote. It was accurate. And stop trolling me.

  14. #34
    Singer posted something to the effect that you hadn't been posting because you'd been having an epic craps roll, or words to that effect.

    I was only mining the ore that he unearthed; get over yourself.
    What, Me Worry?

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Singer posted something to the effect that you hadn't been posting because you'd been having an epic craps roll, or words to that effect.

    I was only mining the ore that he unearthed; get over yourself.
    Bullshit. You were trying to set me up for another round of trolling and insults. The team was waiting to pounce on me. Crimm, Boz, and the others were licking their chops in anticipation. Even Crimm couldn't wait... look at the post above.

    Rob's post was accurate. Stop trolling me.

  16. #36
    I told you all it was just an epic crap session from his visit to the comped buffet and that damn fake juice. Alan seems to be a bit skittish to talk about it

  17. #37
    Alan, can you walk us through your gambling journey and how you have lost 100's of thousands playing craps.

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Alan, can you walk us through your gambling journey and how you have lost 100's of thousands playing craps.
    If I wrote a book would you pay $19.95 to read it?

    (Keep trolling.)

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Alan, can you walk us through your gambling journey and how you have lost 100's of thousands playing craps.
    If I wrote a book would you pay $19.95 to read it?

    (Keep trolling.)
    Why is that trolling? I honestly want to know. You said that you have hit a few 100k royals IIRC? Didn't you say that you never had a winning year? You said, you didn't give all that money back on VP, but you lost it all back on craps?????

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Alan, can you walk us through your gambling journey and how you have lost 100's of thousands playing craps.
    If I wrote a book would you pay $19.95 to read it?

    (Keep trolling.)
    Why is that trolling? I honestly want to know. You said that you have hit a few 100k royals IIRC? Didn't you say that you never had a winning year? You said, you didn't give all that money back on VP, but you lost it all back on craps?????
    I also said why would anyone who uses their own name talk about profits in a casino.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. big craps roll
    By regnis in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-23-2016, 02:52 PM
  2. Should your bets work during the come out roll in craps?
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-09-2015, 11:05 AM
  3. Bank roll
    By whodat in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-18-2015, 04:15 PM
  4. Best Roll Of My Life
    By RoeIncarnate in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2015, 07:12 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-10-2013, 02:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •