Last edited by Bill Yung; 11-08-2018 at 10:08 AM.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
Oh, I remember the Black Diamond. Holy hell, Boz, we do frequent the same locales! Tower City is just up the road, more or less. My friend, a SORT team leader, loved the Black Diamond. It was classier than my usual hangouts -- LOL. It was on the main drag (Lehigh Avenue) off the interstate. When I was less than 10, I lived on Lehigh about four blocks away from the Black Diamond.
If you make further Frackville explorations, check out Roman's Lounge. Nice place; good food. The owner, Vince Roman, and I go back a long way. Just go in, tell him you know Bob Dietz, and request a gambling story or two. Ask him about gambling while peeling potatoes.
Back to the numbers for Bill. 100K hands per year is 1923. In order to average $100K per year, one would have to average a profit of $1 per hand. Simple math. No?
Losing $29k in a week is a little over $15 per hand based on annual average. IF 10% of the hands were large bets at an average of $500, one would have to win 67 and lose 125 hands to lose $29k. This assumes no ties and one broke even on the regular plays. So this is probably a best case scenario.
There is a saying in the stock market. "Read the numbers. Don't listen to the noise."
At 67-125 it would take a tremendous amount of resolve not to chase. Hence, the saying "this can't be happening to me" at some point.
Now to recoup in a week, one would have to go 125-67. That's 65%. Hard to stay under the radar at the pace IMO.
This good news for a local player is their operating expense is probably in the black.
I run about 60% large bet wins with a column count at 4% large bet allocation. I'd like to go 6%, but the value isn't worth the tradeoff of tolerance IMO.
So a 10% large bet ratio on 100k hands is 10K large bets annually. At 6% of the 10%, about 6000 bets would be made in the lower echelon of TCs. Hence, a win percentage of 50.50% is slightly generous. The loss would be 49.50%. So 3030 wins and 2970 losses. At $500 per hand, large bet average, is a huge amount of volatility for $30,000 a year. The better 4% would be around 53% wins and 47% losses resulting in an overall average of 51.50% wins and 49.50% losses. These figures assume a perfectly executed side count for insurance. It also assumes break even play on minimum bets.
So 10K hands at 51.5% is 5,150 large bet hands won and 4,850 lost. This is $2,575,000 in profit vs 2,425,000 loss. Result $150,000 annual income.
Last edited by Moses; 11-11-2018 at 11:50 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)