Question for APs

[coach belly]

Alan wrote that he thinks that you are the first AP ever on this forum to report a loss.

I think you're the first AP ever on this forum to report a loss.

Are you agreeing with him, or disagreeing with him?

It seems like you are disagreeing with something that he did not write.

Really Alan? First time? Think back to how the accumulated EV discussion began. Didn't it start with me posting about a losing day? $8800 loss sound familiar?

[Alan Mendelson]

Thank you for reporting your $29,000 loss. I think you're the first AP ever on this forum to report a loss. Everybody else just wins, wins, wins.

Really Alan? First time? Think back to how the accumulated EV discussion began. Didn't it start with me posting about a losing day? $8800 loss sound familiar?

Also weren't you on WofV in 2014? That was my really lousy year, far below expectation that included one of my 6 month losing periods. I posted about it regularly as I was going through it.

Yes kewlj. You're the first AP to report a loss here. Your $8800 loss was included in my original statement. Again I said YOU were the first AP to report a loss. I did not say your $29,000 loss was the first ever reported.

We've had our issues before with reading comprehension, haven't we?

I'm also very glad you defined your three issues with me.

First, your theory about accumulating EV. I'm not going to continue the discussion because it's been exhausted but others shared my opinion.

2. Counting two tables? Again I'm not alone questioning that.

3. The 18 yos. Let's be clear. I didn't throw 18 yos in a row. I saw someone else do it and watched it and no one bet on it including me. I don't care if you believe it or not.

One more thing kewlj. Winning a million dollars playing blackjack may sound great but it's only about $60,000 a year without any security or a benefits package including health insurance. $60,000 a year gambling won't get you in a magazine or on 60 Minutes. It probably also doesn't get you the attention of casino surveillance. $60,000 a year is only about $166 a day and I see retirees do that at the craps tables every day at Red Rock.

You're small potatoes. But carry on. I doubt you can do anything else.

You too, mickeycrimm. I doubt you can do anything else either you foul mouthed, trash talking, homeless alcoholic.

[kewlJ]

I AM small potatoes Alan. That is the plan. I have the bankroll to play higher limits now but choose not to. I play what is well tolerated.

Your 60 grand math, while true, is a bit scewed because I only made 30 grand over my first 3 year. Less than 100k over my first 5. Average over last 10 is higher. But still on that range I am trying to stay in.

I got a new phone and it's killing me. Way to easy to check in and respond. I gotta stop this shit. Lol

[Bill Yung]

And my own neat little theory of everything. I play with theories and facts. Certainly not spaceships to Jupiter.

Ah, those theories.

You posted your "deep thoughts" for awhile at Penalty Box but stopped now that you've posted regularly on this forum.

I never could quite get the gist of just what the fuck you were getting at, especially with that periodic table discussion.

Anyway, it seems you've found a home here; people may not want you posting here but as with Singer you can only be banned by Dan, and he's pretty tolerant.

So what's this again about the periodic table?

Gambling math just means math that it is no longer really math. Life reduced to a bunch of meaningless numbers. Half a percent here, a quarter of a percent there. No wonder the ancient Greek mathematicians, who laid the foundations of modern math, had zero interest in it. And totally forgot to mention it. For sure, there are no lessons in math at any blackjack table. People sit there alone together, and scratch their asses, and hope for a better life. Mass "gaming".

As with the gambling and its forums, I sought a similar but simultaneous form of the game-of-poker's optimal strategy of "cooperation but not" among its players (in fun) while I define and formulate my own theory of everything. Whereby, I, too, sought to render the numbers useless, but for more inventive avenues of paradox akin to and conducive of such a theory. How does a theory of everything already reside in the everything? Another paradox, to say the least.

MrV, sorry that your own understanding of anything scientifically bookish is so severely limited. Not my problem. But science and math fit in with any gambling forum, as I outlined above, if only to reassure everyone that there is no proper way to gamble for any amount of money. You may, and undoubtedly will, hem, heave and haw, but it changes nothing. Family law must be the armpit of any law.

Find me a mathematician who gambles, or who in any way endorses the Wizard and any of his forums, and I will take off my hip waders, and doff my hat to you. (Excluding Jacobson, of course, who sells gambling stuff, or did, until, one day at the Wizard's, he wrote that he must have lost his mind for doing it.)

No problem with the other site. I continue to develop my theory wrt the periodic table, and in general as well. Putting things together theoretically always lags a bit with the new discoveries.

I'm in a good spot with it. Matched up a couple of key sums of consecutive primes within the part of table that overlaps our dimensions. Two for two, actually, and without effort. The numbers either jibe or not. I have nothing to prove in any hurried manner. Will relate the numbers and dimensions directly to the physical quantities in good time. The key is to see such a relation or correspondence between all of those. But, I don't want to give that away, just yet.

The periodic table, itself, how it is formed, is still one of the great unknowns of science. Well beyond problems like the Riemann Hypothesis, for which the experts still expect to see some sort of solution within the next hundred years. Likely, we may never even be able to construct more than a handful more of the elements of the table, beyond the 118th. Which spells out bad news for a system of theory based solely on observable results.

[Alan Mendelson]

We all have average earnings. My first TV job paid $140 a week. Of course your first years had lower income kewlj. That's the income curve we all have.

Staying small, under the radar, will allow you to play longer. But someday (perhaps sooner than we both think) only high limit players will have real human dealers and everyone else will be playing Stadium Blackjack. When that day comes you won't be under the radar anymore. Good luck.

[mickeycrimm]

Thank you for reporting your $29,000 loss. I think you're the first AP ever on this forum to report a loss. Everybody else just wins, wins, wins.

Really Alan? First time? Think back to how the accumulated EV discussion began. Didn't it start with me posting about a losing day? $8800 loss sound familiar?

Also weren't you on WofV in 2014? That was my really lousy year, far below expectation that included one of my 6 month losing periods. I posted about it regularly as I was going through it.

Yes kewlj. You're the first AP to report a loss here. Your $8800 loss was included in my original statement. Again I said YOU were the first AP to report a loss. I did not say your $29,000 loss was the first ever reported.

We've had our issues before with reading comprehension, haven't we?

I'm also very glad you defined your three issues with me.

First, your theory about accumulating EV. I'm not going to continue the discussion because it's been exhausted but others shared my opinion.

2. Counting two tables? Again I'm not alone questioning that.

3. The 18 yos. Let's be clear. I didn't throw 18 yos in a row. I saw someone else do it and watched it and no one bet on it including me. I don't care if you believe it or not.

One more thing kewlj. Winning a million dollars playing blackjack may sound great but it's only about $60,000 a year without any security or a benefits package including health insurance. $60,000 a year gambling won't get you in a magazine or on 60 Minutes. It probably also doesn't get you the attention of casino surveillance. $60,000 a year is only about $166 a day and I see retirees do that at the craps tables every day at Red Rock.

You're small potatoes. But carry on. I doubt you can do anything else.

You too, mickeycrimm. I doubt you can do anything else either you foul mouthed, trash talking, homeless alcoholic.

Fuck you, bitch. It's only the 2nd and you're broke already.

[Rob.Singer]

Looks like Bill was onto something that made weasely little kew try to save face once again, In fear that his online anonymous phony gambling personality might suffer more hits.

Yes, it certainly IS curious that after losing his sugar daddy to whatever strange disease, the house HAD to be sold and kew hightailed it right into some rental joint using baby bro's money. And all the pretend money-making from playing bj in the world won't be able to hide that fact.

Is it any wonder WHY such a big mouth "look at me!" "look at me!" idiot ABSOLUTELY NEEDS to remain an anonymous coward??

[mickeycrimm]

And my own neat little theory of everything. I play with theories and facts. Certainly not spaceships to Jupiter.

Ah, those theories.

You posted your "deep thoughts" for awhile at Penalty Box but stopped now that you've posted regularly on this forum.

I never could quite get the gist of just what the fuck you were getting at, especially with that periodic table discussion.

Anyway, it seems you've found a home here; people may not want you posting here but as with Singer you can only be banned by Dan, and he's pretty tolerant.

So what's this again about the periodic table?

Gambling math just means math that it is no longer really math. Life reduced to a bunch of meaningless numbers. Half a percent here, a quarter of a percent there. No wonder the ancient Greek mathematicians, who laid the foundations of modern math, had zero interest in it. And totally forgot to mention it. For sure, there are no lessons in math at any blackjack table. People sit there alone together, and scratch their asses, and hope for a better life. Mass "gaming".

As with the gambling and its forums, I sought a similar but simultaneous form of the game-of-poker's optimal strategy of "cooperation but not" among its players (in fun) while I define and formulate my own theory of everything. Whereby, I, too, sought to render the numbers useless, but for more inventive avenues of paradox akin to and conducive of such a theory. How does a theory of everything already reside in the everything? Another paradox, to say the least.

MrV, sorry that your own understanding of anything scientifically bookish is so severely limited. Not my problem. But science and math fit in with any gambling forum, as I outlined above, if only to reassure everyone that there is no proper way to gamble for any amount of money. You may, and undoubtedly will, hem, heave and haw, but it changes nothing. Family law must be the armpit of any law.

Find me a mathematician who gambles, or who in any way endorses the Wizard and any of his forums, and I will take off my hip waders, and doff my hat to you. (Excluding Jacobson, of course, who sells gambling stuff, or did, until, one day at the Wizard's, he wrote that he must have lost his mind for doing it.)

No problem with the other site. I continue to develop my theory wrt the periodic table, and in general as well. Putting things together theoretically always lags a bit with the new discoveries.

I'm in a good spot with it. Matched up a couple of key sums of consecutive primes within the part of table that overlaps our dimensions. Two for two, actually, and without effort. The numbers either jibe or not. I have nothing to prove in any hurried manner. Will relate the numbers and dimensions directly to the physical quantities in good time. The key is to see such a relation or correspondence between all of those. But, I don't want to give that away, just yet.

The periodic table, itself, how it is formed, is still one of the great unknowns of science. Well beyond problems like the Riemann Hypothesis, for which the experts still expect to see some sort of solution within the next hundred years. Likely, we may never even be able to construct more than a handful more of the elements of the table, beyond the 118th. Which spells out bad news for a system of theory based solely on observable results.

When I see a post this long from the troll there is no way in hell I'm going to read it. But let me take a guess. It's all psychobabble, right?

[The Boz]

Don't worry Mick, Alan has found someone to support his habit again. The next Ex Wife will sadly end up broke with only empty dreams of the $100,000 Royal's Alan told her just a few hands away.

Hopefully his son cares enough to warn her. We know Robbo sure won't. He probably thinks she deserves it.

[mickeycrimm]

Looks like Bill was onto something that made weasely little kew try to save face once again, In fear that his online anonymous phony gambling personality might suffer more hits.

Yes, it certainly IS curious that after losing his sugar daddy to whatever strange disease, the house HAD to be sold and kew hightailed it right into some rental joint using baby bro's money. And all the pretend money-making from playing bj in the world won't be able to hide that fact.

Is it any wonder WHY such a big mouth "look at me!" "look at me!" idiot ABSOLUTELY NEEDS to remain an anonymous coward??

[Bill Yung]

You're small potatoes. But carry on. I doubt you can do anything else.

You too, mickeycrimm. I doubt you can do anything else either you foul mouthed, trash talking, homeless alcoholic.

I will never get over how the smartest persons in gambling always turn out to be the illiterate scum-sucking idiots who have to declare it (at length) for themselves.

Did the Wiz ever come across those McNugget numbers?

https://www.google.ca/search?q=McNug...hrome&ie=UTF-8

[Moses]

We all have average earnings. My first TV job paid $140 a week. Of course your first years had lower income kewlj. That's the income curve we all have.

$1.75 an hour. But I could work up to 16 hours a day 6 days a week. And I could change my oil whenever I wanted. Broke down tractor tires just for the workout. I think I worked them all. Heck, today I make more per week just in free play.

Do you know the best product to eat away the rust on those old tractor tires? C'mon Bill, you're the scientists.

[Bill Yung]

Take a break, there, Mickey. Wouldn't want you start up with the bottle, again.

[Bill Yung]

Do you know the best product to eat away the rust on those old tractor tires? C'mon Bill, you're the scientists.

I grew up on a farm as well. Actually, we had two farms. Tractor tires never become rusty. Maybe, you mean the rust off the rims.

[Rob.Singer]

Take a break, there, Mickey. Wouldn't want you start up with the bottle, again.

He never gave it up. Anonymous people can say anything they want. Just look at how rattled he gets over me exposing him as a loner and loser with his only girlfriend ever being Rosie Palmer. He puts up the same picture over and over again when he finally realizes posting my real name and '96 bankruptcy isn't doing the job.

Hey Rosie---dont forget to get a shot of penicillin tomorrow!

[mickeycrimm]

I grew up on a farm as well. Actually, we had two farms. Tractor tires never become rusty. Maybe, you mean the rust off the rims.

You lost the first farm drawing to a straight. You lost the 2nd farm when you made a straight.

[mickeycrimm]

Take a break, there, Mickey. Wouldn't want you start up with the bottle, again.

He never gave it up. Anonymous people can say anything they want. Just look at how rattled he gets over me exposing him as a loner and loser with his only girlfriend ever being Rosie Palmer. He puts up the same picture over and over again when he finally realizes posting my real name and '96 bankruptcy isn't doing the job.

Hey Rosie---dont forget to get a shot of penicillin tomorrow!

[Bill Yung]

Too late, Mickey found another mickey to talk to.

[Moses]

Do you know the best product to eat away the rust on those old tractor tires? C'mon Bill, you're the scientists.

I grew up on a farm as well. Actually, we had two farms. Tractor tires never become rusty. Maybe, you mean the rust off the rims.

Yes. In order to break them down, you have to remove the rust as the tire is attached to the rim. In other words, the tire was rusted to the rim.

[Moses]

I see the resemblance in post #117. But did you know Rob Singer is also Rob Dancer?