I just want to say a few things and then you can all jump all over me, as usual.
First I'm glad that Dan is not censoring Rob and is allowing for readers to judge Rob themselves. Honestly there are valid things Rob says about playing video poker that the APs here refuse to accept because of their own stubbornness. And there are statements that the APs make against Rob because of their own ignorance.
Two examples:
1. Rob does not use a Martingale strategy but the APs will never accept it.
2. Rob uses the math of the games to play and the APs here will never accept that either.
But, with that said, Rob has made statements that lack proof and shouldn't be made. First this claim that redietz has solicited Rob. Without proof that he can provide Rob should drop that claim.
Also, let it be clear that Rob has never proven his million dollars of winnings but I'm going to say it again: I see no reason why a high limit video poker player couldn't win a million dollars over ten years.
I can't comment about the sports picking because I don't know a damn thing about sports betting. By the way with my random computer picks at Red Rock I'm now tied in 41st place, but more importantly I've won entries into six different drawings including the drawing for having picked only losing teams in one week. How about that for an accomplishment!
We agree on this. I believe in probabilities. As in, if you sit down and play a 99% vp game in a single denomination for 3 hours, you'll PROBABLY lose. You'll also PROBABLY lose if the game is at 102%.
Conversely, if you were to sit down and play my 6-denomination SPS for 3 hours at either %, you'll PROBABLY win.
And the above scenarios can and do happen time after time after time, because no PROBABILITY theory in the world will ever change the expectation of playing single session after single session after single session.
That's just the way it is. And I am the only one here who is intelligent enough to understand it, and the only one here who has ever done it.
Another possibility is the revolution in deep learning algorithms. So the linemakers might be using simplistic stuff, but others ("smart money") making the wagers may be using AI/deep learning to create far superior models. These can be unsupervised algorithms meaning that people just collect all the metrics they can (such as "Is NFL pro QB from California" coded as 0 or 1, "Did NFL pro QB play his whole college career in California" coded as 0 or 1 for the model, etc.) and then the unsupervised algorithm generates the vastly superior models from these thousands of metrics collected by humans (or rather the collecting bins are created by humans and computers populate the created metrics). So the smart money may be outsourcing physics/math crews to make the models and the physics/math crews might be putting down some action themselves.
I am with Redietz here. I am done participating here. I know people will jump on that statement because I have said it many times before. But there just is no sense in continuing with this insanity. I have tried everything and I mean everything I can think of to get Dan to take an interest in this site and want this site to be more than the trolling name-calling shithole that it is, but Dan refuses. He just doesn't give a shit that this site is a joke, a laughing stock.
We aren't talking about a difference of opinion, we are talking lunacy. Earth is flat stuff. 18 y.o.'s in a row. Million dollar longterm earnings playing -EV games. Stop limits, progressive wagering and all the other mathematically proven nonsense and voodoo.
So have at it. When I arrived, Vegas Casino Talk was a troll infested shithole that no legitimate gambler whether playing with an advantage or recreational, takes seriously and it is the same as I leave. I will no longer waste my time on a forum that the owner is just as much of the problem as the trolls that he allows to run the show.
I encourage all other serious members and players, AP's and recreational to do likewise and let this shithole site die and just fade away.
You're again full of it kew, because you just can't take it when someone says something about you if it's not "kew's my bj hero" or "kew has such a large....bankroll". So what do you ALWAYS end up doing? Yup....keep on taking peeks so you can get infuriated again! Then you come crawling back And stop blaming Dan. YOU'RE the sole reason you got banned from the pussified WoV forum.
But just think....if you were ONLY the self-proclaimed stud bj-pro who wins every year and can count two tables simultaneously and accumulates all those wondrous phantom bucks that you've concocted to be here....then guess what? Right!--YOU WOULDN'T EVER HAVE THE NERVE-WRACKING NEED TO KEEP HOPING NO ONE CALLS YOUR FOOLISH BLUFFS, and there'd never be this tortuous requirement you possess to keep "taking a look". True successful gambling pros do not have the problems you're saddled with.
Think about it....and cry me a river (sniffle sniffle)
Kew does it for the attention, and the belief that he'll be missed.
Redietz does it because that's how they do it on Pluto.
Then there's the burning question of why redietz would go on and on about why people like him in the sports betting business, would be smart and right to also try and SELL their fantastic picks, while at the same time vehemently denying that he tried to sell his "sure things" as he calls them in his business, to me.
They tell me that's the way it's done on the other side of the little dipper.
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 12-11-2018 at 02:02 PM.
Cut out the Jibber Jabber!
On with the Special 5 Picks and Parlay for this week!!
After that shut your dang pie hole!
Is he part of the Negro Football League?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
What an idiot you are mickey. Even aging uses a "martingale variant". That lack of education thing keeps biting you right in the ass, doesn't it.
Alan, it is a "stone cold fact" that redietz has solicited me. I don't have proof because I don't retain text messages or record phone calls. However, exposing him for doing this is fair play, esp. for a scoundrel such as him.
True, I have not proven that I've won a million bucks with my strategy, but neither has anyone else, especially the AP's, who claim to do nothing but win. But....I am the only one I know of who publicly challenged the AP's that I could prove with detailed tax and financial records that I had won $640k to date at the time and I put up the verifiable--and verified $640k--in cash, but the disbelievers suddenly went silent and disappeared.
Now it's too bad they walked because I could have absolutely proven it. The end result is that they can keep on pretending and saying I didn't win. However, has anyone ever witnessed any gambler go as far as I have, AND IN PUBLICATION FORM WITH A REAL 6-FIGURE ESCROW, to prove their claims? That alone should allow my words to have some amount of merit to any fair-minded individual, and it all is retained in public records for anyone to go back and check. My guess is a few of the creepy armchair ap's here and on WoV have already done so. Why else do you think they hate and envy me?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)