Harry Argentino (Rob Singer) mentioning "accumulated EV" in an attempt to draw me into discussion. Awww, isn't that cute. He misses me. (insert vomiting emoji)
I am not going to give Argentino the satisfaction of discussing accumulated EV, something he most obviously has no understanding about, but I do want you to take a look at the following post also made today:
I ask those that support this lair, fraud and clown, does this sound like a man happy and content, enjoying his retirement? Or does this sound like a person angry and bitter? Angry, bitter and jealous of those that have been able to do what he has always dreamed of, making money from the casinos, making a living from the casinos? Be honest...is this a person content and enjoying this happy retirement they claim to have or is this someone bitter and angry?
Now this post is only 1 of 2 so far today that Harry Argentino has mentioned his "7 figure retirement accounts". Again I am addressing you blind supporters of this fraud. How many happily retired people with significant retirement savings do you know that run around constantly harping online about their retirement funds? Again, all I ask is that you be honest because no one really in this position does this.
Finally any of you supporters of this fraud, who are now taking an honest look at this person you are supporting, and have questions either from these questions, or recent activity with his dishonesty involving the disgusting discussion and proposed wager that he has now reneged on, I ask you to do one more thing. Look into the publicly available information on Mr. Argentino. You will see evictions, legal judgements, welfare fraud, but somehow no property owned in his name.
So again, I am going to ask you to be honest and think with your brain, not the fact that you want to support this person. Does evictions, legal judgements, welfare fraud sound like the legal history of a man with million dollar retirement accounts and who claims million dollar winnings on top of that? Add in no property owned. Do millionaires have nothing to their name? Is this legal information the information and history of a millionaire living comfortably off his million dollar retirement or is this legal information and history that of a bitter old man, squeezing by on a small fixed retirement and angry as hell about it? All I ask of you is to be honest.
The truth will set you free.
Now, about that claim that you have a horse cock ...
Take a deep breath and tell the truth; it won't make your cock grow any bigger (sorry: there's winners and then there's losers) but it should conclude your latest exercise in "look at me!" attention-whoring.
What, Me Worry?
You know Mr. V when I saw a picture of you at one of those WOV meet-ups, my gaydar started to beep and blink. Your consistent interest in Rob’s cock confirms my instincts are still sharp.
Since you're speaking of the truth will set you free, now might be a good time to come out of the closet. Start the new years off free at last. Could be healthy for you.
Many retirement accounts cannot be tapped to pay bills, including my pension account. While 401ks can be tapped, an employer paid pension account can't. At the same time it's shielded in case of bankruptcy. I hate to bring this example up but OJs pensions from the NFL and from the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) cannot be touched by his creditors including the Goldman family. He gets something like $33,000 a month, if I recall correctly.
My pension fund has a monthly payment equivalent to an account worth several million dollars. If I cried and screamed and stood on my head spitting wooden nickels I could not get any advance on my monthly payments.
In fact one of my ex wives who gets only $65 a month from my pension tried to get a lump sum or an advance but couldn't.
So the bottom line is you can't tap your pension to make payments to avoid or cancel a bankruptcy. If you had a 401k it would be different.
One of the reasons I never talked about my VP profits was because I was trying to negotiate a post divorce pension buyout with wife #3. I can tell you now that the negotiations failed. She wouldn't accept a cash payment from me and instead she wants a monthly payment from my pension fund. So... she's going to start collecting $174 a month from our short term marriage. I'm laughing now. She thought she was going to get maybe a thousand a month. LOL
She's now 59 years old. She will be paying taxes on that $174 a month instead of a tax free lump sum I offered her.
Anyone interested in my win loss statements now?
Yes V, this was what the post divorce negotiations were all about.
Blackhole: Gaydar. Now, that's funny.
My 82 year old friend was describing a person as half queer. I said "Lou there is no such thing as a half -" and about that time she/he walked by. "by gosh, I think you're right."
alan, nothing wrong with negotiating post-decree
If she thought she'd get about a grand a month but only wound up with $174 she had some bad advice.
It ain't rocket science, although drafting QDRO's does require expertise due to the complexity.
I do have a question, as one thing about this puzzles me: as this is post-decree, I must assume that the divorce decree also had a QDRO awarding her a readily determinable interest in your defined benefit plan.
Given that, why in god's name would she not know the exact value of her portion of the benefit?
Or, as I suspect is the case, did you guys delay the preparation of the QDRO for some time, and only get around to it now?
What, Me Worry?
Her lawyer failed to get the QDRO. Her lawyer also failed to contact my union to get a pre determination of QDRO benefits. Finally about a month ago we all got serious about resolving it.
Most family law attorneys fear QDRO's and prefer to farm them out to specialists.
Money well spent.
What, Me Worry?
If you have a personal pension account full of cash from your employer you can take it out early and pay the early withdrawal tax (if you are under retirement age). If you just have an annuity-like monthly pension that comes from a general fund of the employer then of course what you are saying applies. I was referring to the former.
There are often points which must be negotiated, depending on the benefit.
Survivor benefits for one; preretirement survivor benefits for another.
A malpractice minefield.
I farm out all but the simplest, easiest ones.
What, Me Worry?
There are no survivor benefits. She gets only what she gets based on the years of the marriage. If I remarry the new wife gets my survivor benefits. If I don't remarry the ex continues to get her $174 per month till she dies.
What happened to the Singer Five Picks?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)