V--what do you have against Dan to make him look at Rob's junk?
V--what do you have against Dan to make him look at Rob's junk?
I think Alan should make it into an infomercial.
Ain't you crazy sons a guns got nothin better to do than ponder the Italian Stallions whopper or Sings schlong? joking.
If Rob uses Viagra before hand, is that an advantage play? What's the math on that?
I don't need no Viagra nohow, and nobody needs Dan to witness nothin. And I don't want no gay WoV guys anywhere near me. All you people need do is send your wives or gf's into my RV near the Silverton and we'll let them warm me up, measure me, then let them fight over who finishes the job. All of them will depart smiling cheek-to-cheek, several of them will leave the event happier than ever, and the rest will go home wondering why they got stuck with the disappointment of a lifetime.
Face it dweebs--size REALLY DOES MATTER to the gals. They'd prefer a hung dude over a shortstop chubby 100% of the time. The reason there's this feeling out there that they probably think it doesn't matter is because they don't want to embarrass any of the less fortunate men.
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 12-13-2018 at 07:31 PM.
Cut the bullshit and get down to setting up workable rules to have the length of your cock measured.
All this crap is just getting in the way of what should be a very simple procedure.
The reality of course is that you have no intention of letting yourself be measured; this is all just shits and giggles for you.
Sorry guy, but you made the brag, and unlike your unverifiable boast of winning over a million at VP this brag can be easily verified or dismissed.
If you refuse to honor the bet you should be perma-banned.
What, Me Worry?
This thread has been "beat' to death. HA. Get It? Of course tonight, after the KC vs LA photo finish, with no games left to bet, the guys were taking wagers on who'd die first.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Wise up V. If you're really an atty. you'd see I laid out terms and none of the WoV anonymous pussies has countered with anything but NO. It's like talking about gambling addiction to these people. Just the mere thought of how they might not measure up in manhood makes them cringe because they're suddenly slapped in the face by something called reality.
Rob Singer Cyberbully!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/dutch-cou...144030570.html
Uh, not quite.
Boz wrote "I’m still in, obviously not under the type garbage Rob posted. There has to be clear rules, and no Rob isn’t holding the cash," and then
" You try to make rules that no reasonable person would deal with, and then claim you “won”. Fucking joke, but we already knew that. Bottom line there is no chance you will take the bet under acceptable to any normal person rules. Instead you want blown by someone’s wife or girlfriend. While holding the money in your safe."
Boz is in.
The only question is when, where, and what are the rules.
It is up to Boz to suggest rules acceptable to him.
If as he and I suspect your real intention is merely to tap dance for your own amusement without going through with it, claiming that his rules are unreasonable, then someone such as Dan should review the proposed rules, consider each of your arguments, and say "Gentlemen, these are the rules: now let's get to it."
One would think that if in fact you were packing the meat you brag about that you'd be only too willing to prove it, especially if a hundred grand is in escrow.
The cock, I mean clock, is running: tick ... tick ... tick ...
Last edited by MisterV; 12-14-2018 at 01:51 PM.
What, Me Worry?
That's right.
Rob's terms are a starting point, Boz should now counter with his terms, and then they negotiate and meet somewhere in the middle.
The only problematic term Rob proposed was the escrow logistics, nobody has offered an explanation why the rest of his terms are dealbreakers.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
deleted. wrong thread.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Top 6 VCT members who ponder Singer's schlong...
#6
#5
#4
#3
#2
#1
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I have posted repeatedly on the subject in order to keep the bettors focused on the subject and to not let it die.
I'll explain.
I could give a fuck in the real world about the size of his cock: really, WGAS?
But in the limited context of this board it is a golden opportunity for him to either prove he's telling the truth or, and this is much more likely and frankly what I suspect will happen, in the alternative for him to be definitively proven to be a liar.
Unlike his claim of winning at casinos this brag can be easily proved: just take the measure of the man.
Frankly it would be a revelation if it were discovered that Rob was being truthful: it could cause me and perhaps others to view his other claims as being something other than bullshit.
But I'm getting tired of discussing it without Boz jumping in and clarifying exactly how he wants it done: dude, the ball is in your court now, I'm gonna take a seat for awhile in the cheap seats and see how this farce unfolds.
What, Me Worry?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)