What I said is of value to people who gamble, and there was no negative comment regarding Argentino. Now pardon me, Mr. Bill, but that does appear to be the purpose of the site.Originally Posted by Bill Yung
What I said is of value to people who gamble, and there was no negative comment regarding Argentino. Now pardon me, Mr. Bill, but that does appear to be the purpose of the site.Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Yeah, good luck getting Alan to understand and accept that jbjb.Originally Posted by jbjbNo. Both are within normal ranges.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Yeah. Explain that on your next mortgage application. LOLOriginally Posted by kewlJYeah, good luck getting Alan to understand and accept that jbjb.Originally Posted by jbjbNo. Both are within normal ranges.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Alan I HAVE gotten 2 different mortgages (from 2 different firms) since I have been in Vegas (9 years). And I had less history than I do now. With tax records showing an average income of 98k over the last 6 years, I am quite sure I could have gotten a 3rd Mortgage for my most recent real estate purchase this past summer, except, I paid cash. Cash won from the casinos. Cash won from casinos because I have mathematics on my side.Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonYeah. Explain that on your next mortgage application. LOLOriginally Posted by kewlJYeah, good luck getting Alan to understand and accept that jbjb.Originally Posted by jbjb
More baloney but in the name of math.Originally Posted by kewlJAlan I HAVE gotten 2 different mortgages (from 2 different firms) since I have been in Vegas (9 years). And I had less history than I do now. With tax records showing an average income of 98k over the last 6 years, I am quite sure I could have gotten a 3rd Mortgage for my most recent real estate purchase this past summer, except, I paid cash. Cash won from the casinos. Cash won from casinos because I have mathematics on my side.
Me thinks that you would be better off to have some proof on your side.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
Kewlj you said you had a 50% down payment. Anyone including a busted gambler or a prison convict can get a mortgage with a 50% down payment.
Pretty good handicapping Rob. Your friend was correctamundo on the parlay bet. Instead of $100 on a 5 team parlay, try $10 on 10 two team parlays mixed and matched. At 60% win rate you probably would've hit one or two at a tidy profit.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Just doing what you don't know how to do, analyzing the betting strategy.Originally Posted by Bill Yung
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Stinkhole, you might be surprised to learn that Dan is a big free speech advocate.Originally Posted by blackholeOriginally Posted by monet
Originally Posted by The Boz
lol
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...16rSZ5GmGIMO3q
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
BTW, the books took a shellacking this past weekend. Rob wasn't in on it.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I saw that and felt left out and lonely.....Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
A few comments on the comments:
1. I understand a parlay is a bad bet, not the least because of not being able to get the best numbers all at the same book. However, not being a savant in this area and the fact that I'm only betting $100/parlay each week for entertainment purposes, makes it an interesting side bet. I've only made about 3 or 4 parlay bets in my life and remember, I had a $40,000+ winner on my last one 6 years ago. So all it takes is one 5-0 week to be a breakout season winner.
2. While my parlay will remain at $100, each week I'm upping my per-game wager by $100, at $500 max. Why not eat better quality road kill each passing week?
3. I'll address the tournament factor that people like redietz, Fezzik and others like to tout as support for their being big shots or something in the sports betting field. To me, tournaments are not barometers--you're playing against other players and you can win even with a not-so-stellar record. Instead, show me someone who puts his picks up BEFORE the games are played and I'll be a believer. The reason I did the Singer Five on LVA was to prove you don't need to be some big deal name in the sports betting world to make some money betting on games. I've always been a big believer in if you are motivated to be good at something...ANYTHING...and if you are not not physically limited, then it can be done by you. I chose to be good at betting NFL games, and although I very infrequently have had the time to do it properly over the years, I have the time now.
Why not eat steak and or the best Italian food in town?Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Excellent quote.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You definitely chose one of the biggest challenges in betting. Best of luck.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
...And Moses. It's okay KJ, no need to explain. I do not understand the younger generation. I have 3 kids who all make over $100K annually. Two of the them ask me for loans (gifts). My crazy math keeps coming up with a difference of $28,980 in a week?Originally Posted by kewlJYeah, good luck getting Alan to understand and accept that jbjb.Originally Posted by jbjbNo. Both are within normal ranges.Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerI saw that and felt left out and lonely.....Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
A few comments on the comments:
1. I understand a parlay is a bad bet, not the least because of not being able to get the best numbers all at the same book. However, not being a savant in this area and the fact that I'm only betting $100/parlay each week for entertainment purposes, makes it an interesting side bet. I've only made about 3 or 4 parlay bets in my life and remember, I had a $40,000+ winner on my last one 6 years ago. So all it takes is one 5-0 week to be a breakout season winner.
2. While my parlay will remain at $100, each week I'm upping my per-game wager by $100, at $500 max. Why not eat better quality road kill each passing week?
3. I'll address the tournament factor that people like redietz, Fezzik and others like to tout as support for their being big shots or something in the sports betting field. To me, tournaments are not barometers--you're playing against other players and you can win even with a not-so-stellar record. Instead, show me someone who puts his picks up BEFORE the games are played and I'll be a believer. The reason I did the Singer Five on LVA was to prove you don't need to be some big deal name in the sports betting world to make some money betting on games. I've always been a big believer in if you are motivated to be good at something...ANYTHING...and if you are not not physically limited, then it can be done by you. I chose to be good at betting NFL games, and although I very infrequently have had the time to do it properly over the years, I have the time now.
Tournaments are not pure barometers, but if they are ATS tournaments, and you cannot beard multiple entries, then they are pretty good indicators that you're doing something correct that season. Where they fall short is that, in this day and age, with spreads moving in college sports as much as they do, WHEN you bet a game is almost as important as WHO you bet.
Much of the actual profit in betting college sports comes from anticipating line moves and shooting for middles. You can be dumb as a rock when it comes to handicapping, but if you can look at a college line and say, "It's gotta move this way," you can still make money.
By the way, in case Argentino didn't understand what he was looking at in the Retro Road Trip thread, the standings in the various "Tipsters or Gypsters?" are not tournament standings. They are obviously a reportage of the actual handicapping records of the participants that year, as monitored by Seattle Times reporter, Mike McCusker.
As a life long Chargers fan it is still hard for me to call them Los Angeles Chargers.Originally Posted by kewlJI am not even seeing SD playing today. Seattle is playing the Los Angeles Chargers.
Like this guy?Originally Posted by mickeycrimmJust doing what you don't know how to do, analyzing the betting strategy.Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Originally Posted by kewlJ
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
Perhaps, posting gambling, and other such nonsense, should be discouraged in the manner that jokingly shouting the word fire in a crowded theatre is no longer allowed. Cowards, crackpots and cunts of a special sort.Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
They'll always be the San Diego Chargers to me also. And I'll NEVER get used to something as sacrilegious as the "Las Vegas Raiders". If they wanted a team there they should have come up with their own name, like LV Gamblers or LV Shooters or something.Originally Posted by dannyjAs a life long Chargers fan it is still hard for me to call them Los Angeles Chargers.Originally Posted by kewlJI am not even seeing SD playing today. Seattle is playing the Los Angeles Chargers.
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerThey'll always be the San Diego Chargers to me also. And I'll NEVER get used to something as sacrilegious as the "Las Vegas Raiders". If they wanted a team there they should have come up with their own name, like LV Gamblers or LV Shooters or something.Originally Posted by dannyjAs a life long Chargers fan it is still hard for me to call them Los Angeles Chargers.Originally Posted by kewlJI am not even seeing SD playing today. Seattle is playing the Los Angeles Chargers.
Honestly, about one out of every three times I see the letters "LaC," I have to do a mental doubletake.
I'm good with Las Vegas Raiders, though. No better place for The Black Hole.
But they were originally the LA Chargers in 1960, then moved to SD.Originally Posted by dannyjAs a life long Chargers fan it is still hard for me to call them Los Angeles Chargers.Originally Posted by kewlJI am not even seeing SD playing today. Seattle is playing the Los Angeles Chargers.
But I still call the Angels the “California Angels “. Old habits are hard to break.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
