Sequential Reversible Royal machine ($210k jackpot)

[Bill Yung]

Be sure to let us know when the distinguished member of the "club of manboys" makes judge.

That will NEVER happen.

"Judge not, lest ye be judged."

I've got more skeletons in my closet than a chiropractor.

A buddy of mine once said "I wouldn't want to be a judge, I couldn't stand taking the cut in pay."

I guess that for many lawyers, the bench becomes the "crowning achievement" of their own work. Fame, book deals, etc, follow.

[redietz]

You’re a WOV reject.

This would seem like another startling Argentino contradiction

At least he's consistent (everything he says is a contradiction).

Just DO NOT ask him about:

1) The number of RVs he had/has and how he's paid for them.
2) How he got the IRS, after years of writing off any gambling wins with losses that zeroed him out, to think that he had overnight become a "professional gambler."
3) About the Jerry Logan posting snafus.

The tardis really cannot help him with those.

[Bill Yung]

This would seem like another startling Argentino contradiction

At least he's consistent (everything he says is a contradiction).

Just DO NOT ask him about:

1) The number of RVs he had/has and how he's paid for them.
2) How he got the IRS, after years of writing off any gambling wins with losses that zeroed him out, to think that he had overnight become a "professional gambler."
3) About the Jerry Logan posting snafus.

The tardis really cannot help him with those.

You're losing it, Red.

[Bill Yung]

Mr. V on his death bed, disbelieving in an afterlife while wondering "Gee, should I have hedged my bet?"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-a8396866.html

Four years is an eternity to an old dying man?

[Rob.Singer]

What other choice do these WoV rejects have other than to claim I'm one also? That forum is a hiding place for every fake AP in existence. It's also a breeding ground for foreigners, minorities, queens, transgenders and liberal weirdos. The difference is, the place wasn't my holy grail, I went there to see if I could shut the plethora of armchair AP's over there up by making a bet with them witnessing me playing my successful strategy, then when they panicked and escaped the challenge Shack had no choice but to do his stupid nuclear thing with me to limit the damage. Could you just image what it would have been like had I still been there when the "AP of AP's" needed to beg for money?

I did show you that sequential royal pic mickey. Is that why you're still vomiting?

And this nonsense about me not playing beyond a royal is all about still being able to do ANYTHING to cure envious positions when everyone was so obviously hurt by the realities I posted that night. Which is, of course, the chief reason I put it all up for you idiots. Nothing like the gift that I KNEW would keep on giving! I never played beyond a royal as a professional player. I'm RECREATIONAL since then. Duh!?

Wise up.

[mickeycrimm]

What other choice do these WoV rejects have other than to claim I'm one also? That forum is a hiding place for every fake AP in existence. It's also a breeding ground for foreigners, minorities, queens, transgenders and liberal weirdos. The difference is, the place wasn't my holy grail, I went there to see if I could shut the plethora of armchair AP's over there up by making a bet with them witnessing me playing my successful strategy, then when they panicked and escaped the challenge Shack had no choice but to do his stupid nuclear thing with me to limit the damage. Could you just image what it would have been like had I still been there when the "AP of AP's" needed to beg for money?

I did show you that sequential royal pic mickey. Is that why you're still vomiting?

And this nonsense about me not playing beyond a royal is all about still being able to do ANYTHING to cure envious positions when everyone was so obviously hurt by the realities I posted that night. Which is, of course, the chief reason I put it all up for you idiots. Nothing like the gift that I KNEW would keep on giving! I never played beyond a royal as a professional player. I'm RECREATIONAL since then. Duh!?

Wise up.

You are not a professional or a recreational. You are a degenerate. And where did you put that pic of the sequential? I didnt see it.

[Rob.Singer]

Now that I read some more of redietz' more foolish assertions where he tries but fails to sound sophisticated, it sheds even further light on why he and the collection of WoV armchair ap's here remain so detached from what's real and what isn't.

Red's had a hard-on for some time over how I could have filed as a professional gambler from 2000-2009, when he thinks I was a loser every year prior, and after all, doesn't the IRS go back and CHECK the gambling history of sudden pro gamblers?

That's how an uneducated idiot with an agenda thinks, and those with similar fake info agendas would always applaud that, as we clearly see here. However, all it does is prove how the majority of you are full of BS when it comes to gambling, gambling professions, and how the IRS operates. IE, you guys have no clue and you prove it with nearly every post.

I tire of schooling you poor people, but when you choose to become a professional gambler and file Schedule C after a lifetime of filing Schedule A, you simply do it. There is no "pre-qualification" and there is no "litmus test" performed by the IRS. You just file as such, and if the time comes where you have an audit or audits--which I had several times during that period--you answer questions in the most advantageous way to you. There was never anything about "how dare you file as a pro" because "you lost in the past". Well, I did lose up until 1996, but I won in '97, '98, and '99. But they had no idea, it didn't come up, and it didn't matter anyway. It does to redietz, because he so desperately wants to make up scenarios that might discredit my past. And all that's a product of my exposing him as a solicitor begging for sports betting money from those who have it.

So wise up people. I know your agenda is one of pretending I'm contradictory, I lie, etc. because that's what irrelevant people do when they are irritated by the successes of the relevant ones. But face it--I've made a career out of "getting your goats" and all you do is feel worse the more you make things up.

I love this stuff!!

[Alan Mendelson]

Rob wrote There is no "pre-qualification" and there is no "litmus test" performed by the IRS. You just file as such, and if the time comes where you have an audit or audits--which I had several times during that period--you answer questions in the most advantageous way to you. There was never anything about "how dare you file as a pro" because "you lost in the past". Well, I did lose up until 1996, but I won in '97, '98, and '99. But they had no idea, it didn't come up, and it didn't matter anyway. I think this is correct but check with your own tax professional.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob wrote There is no "pre-qualification" and there is no "litmus test" performed by the IRS. You just file as such, and if the time comes where you have an audit or audits--which I had several times during that period--you answer questions in the most advantageous way to you. There was never anything about "how dare you file as a pro" because "you lost in the past". Well, I did lose up until 1996, but I won in '97, '98, and '99. But they had no idea, it didn't come up, and it didn't matter anyway. I think this is correct but check with your own tax professional.

That's always good advice Alan, but none of the boobs here are even within a million miles of any of these things. Can you imagine mickey having a tax professional?

[mickeycrimm]

Now that I read some more of redietz' more foolish assertions where he tries but fails to sound sophisticated, it sheds even further light on why he and the collection of WoV armchair ap's here remain so detached from what's real and what isn't.

Red's had a hard-on for some time over how I could have filed as a professional gambler from 2000-2009, when he thinks I was a loser every year prior, and after all, doesn't the IRS go back and CHECK the gambling history of sudden pro gamblers?

That's how an uneducated idiot with an agenda thinks, and those with similar fake info agendas would always applaud that, as we clearly see here. However, all it does is prove how the majority of you are full of BS when it comes to gambling, gambling professions, and how the IRS operates. IE, you guys have no clue and you prove it with nearly every post.

I tire of schooling you poor people, but when you choose to become a professional gambler and file Schedule C after a lifetime of filing Schedule A, you simply do it. There is no "pre-qualification" and there is no "litmus test" performed by the IRS. You just file as such, and if the time comes where you have an audit or audits--which I had several times during that period--you answer questions in the most advantageous way to you. There was never anything about "how dare you file as a pro" because "you lost in the past". Well, I did lose up until 1996, but I won in '97, '98, and '99. But they had no idea, it didn't come up, and it didn't matter anyway. It does to redietz, because he so desperately wants to make up scenarios that might discredit my past. And all that's a product of my exposing him as a solicitor begging for sports betting money from those who have it.

So wise up people. I know your agenda is one of pretending I'm contradictory, I lie, etc. because that's what irrelevant people do when they are irritated by the successes of the relevant ones. But face it--I've made a career out of "getting your goats" and all you do is feel worse the more you make things up.

I love this stuff!!

And as you have stated many times your tax returns reflect that you didn't make a dime of profit in those tens years. In other words, a complete failure.

[Alan Mendelson]

Mickeycrimm it depends how you define failure and how you put Rob's purported tax filings in perspective.

I haven't seen Rob's taxes... but if he really did win a million dollars at video poker and then paid zero taxes on it because he used deductions for groceries, dining out, parties etc., then I would suggest he's the #1 biggest, most successful AP of all time!

[mickeycrimm]

Mickeycrimm it depends how you define failure and how you put Rob's purported tax filings in perspective.

I haven't seen Rob's taxes... but if he really did win a million dollars at video poker and then paid zero taxes on it because he used deductions for groceries, dining out, parties etc., then I would suggest he's the #1 biggest, most successful AP of all time!

No, Tax cheat. Filing a false return is a felony. If you could really do what Rob said is legal to do then every small business in the country would not be paying taxes.

[Alan Mendelson]

Mickeycrimm it depends how you define failure and how you put Rob's purported tax filings in perspective.

I haven't seen Rob's taxes... but if he really did win a million dollars at video poker and then paid zero taxes on it because he used deductions for groceries, dining out, parties etc., then I would suggest he's the #1 biggest, most successful AP of all time!

No, Tax cheat. Filing a false return is a felony. If you could really do what Rob said is legal to do then every small business in the country would not be paying taxes.

Rob claims he survived at least one audit. Maybe it was two audits?

Ya know, he might have paid taxes on other income. He might not have cheated at all.

[Deech]

From what I understand about Schedule C, if you file as a professional gambler, you are not allowed to have consistent outside income. If so, then that is considered your job.

I am not a tax expert but I file a Schedule C.

[redietz]

Now that I read some more of redietz' more foolish assertions where he tries but fails to sound sophisticated, it sheds even further light on why he and the collection of WoV armchair ap's here remain so detached from what's real and what isn't.

Red's had a hard-on for some time over how I could have filed as a professional gambler from 2000-2009, when he thinks I was a loser every year prior, and after all, doesn't the IRS go back and CHECK the gambling history of sudden pro gamblers?

That's how an uneducated idiot with an agenda thinks, and those with similar fake info agendas would always applaud that, as we clearly see here. However, all it does is prove how the majority of you are full of BS when it comes to gambling, gambling professions, and how the IRS operates. IE, you guys have no clue and you prove it with nearly every post.

I tire of schooling you poor people, but when you choose to become a professional gambler and file Schedule C after a lifetime of filing Schedule A, you simply do it. There is no "pre-qualification" and there is no "litmus test" performed by the IRS. You just file as such, and if the time comes where you have an audit or audits--which I had several times during that period--you answer questions in the most advantageous way to you. There was never anything about "how dare you file as a pro" because "you lost in the past". Well, I did lose up until 1996, but I won in '97, '98, and '99. But they had no idea, it didn't come up, and it didn't matter anyway. It does to redietz, because he so desperately wants to make up scenarios that might discredit my past. And all that's a product of my exposing him as a solicitor begging for sports betting money from those who have it.

So wise up people. I know your agenda is one of pretending I'm contradictory, I lie, etc. because that's what irrelevant people do when they are irritated by the successes of the relevant ones. But face it--I've made a career out of "getting your goats" and all you do is feel worse the more you make things up.

I love this stuff!!

So do I. Unlike some folks, I actually filed a year or two as a professional gambler. But good try, Argentino.

And Deech, you are correct.

[Bill Yung]

So do I. Unlike some folks, I actually filed a year or two as a professional gambler. But good try, Argentino.

I never did, ha! You make it sound like a bad thing not to have done it.

[Alan Mendelson]

From what I understand about Schedule C, if you file as a professional gambler, you are not allowed to have consistent outside income. If so, then that is considered your job.

I am not a tax expert but I file a Schedule C.

We had a similar discussion about this. From what I understand an individual can have multiple schedule Cs from multiple businesses.

I think you need to discuss this with a tax professional or get a formal opinion from the IRS. I don't think any of the members on this forum are qualified and that includes our esteemed lawyers and readers of various gambling books.

Sorry but reading Jean Scott's book doesn't make you an expert.

If anyone does have a formal opinion or statement from the IRS please post it.

[Rob.Singer]

Mickeycrimm it depends how you define failure and how you put Rob's purported tax filings in perspective.

I haven't seen Rob's taxes... but if he really did win a million dollars at video poker and then paid zero taxes on it because he used deductions for groceries, dining out, parties etc., then I would suggest he's the #1 biggest, most successful AP of all time!

No, Tax cheat. Filing a false return is a felony. If you could really do what Rob said is legal to do then every small business in the country would not be paying taxes.

Rob claims he survived at least one audit. Maybe it was two audits?

Ya know, he might have paid taxes on other income. He might not have cheated at all.

Again, and as much as any particular person or persons can't comprehend or stand it, I wrote every dollar of my nearly one million dollars in gambling profits off as a direct credit expense during my ten year career. And every single deduction was in accordance with the IRS rules while using some legal loopholes. I had the help of an IRS employee in doing so. As I said, unlike AP's and other big talkers, I was fully prepared in every possible way when I started out as a professional gambler.

And once again, I had other income that had nothing to do with employment and everything to do with smart investments, and my wife had income from her job. We paid taxes on all of those.

So let's hear some more words of wisdom from the likes of mickey, and any others who like to believe that what they wish to be true has got to be true.

[regnis]

From what I understand about Schedule C, if you file as a professional gambler, you are not allowed to have consistent outside income. If so, then that is considered your job.

I am not a tax expert but I file a Schedule C.

We had a similar discussion about this. From what I understand an individual can have multiple schedule Cs from multiple businesses.

I think you need to discuss this with a tax professional or get a formal opinion from the IRS. I don't think any of the members on this forum are qualified and that includes our esteemed lawyers and readers of various gambling books.

Sorry but reading Jean Scott's book doesn't make you an expert.

If anyone does have a formal opinion or statement from the IRS please post it.

I have addressed this issue before in much greater detail then what I am writing here.
1. You can file numerous schedule C.
2. To qualify as a professional gambler it need not be your sole source of income or even your primary source of income.
3. Numerous factors are involved, the primary one being an intent to operate for profit and operating your gambling venture in a professional manner. Tthis includes putting sufficient time into it, but it does not need to be full time.
4. The rule that you have to show a profit in 2 of 5 or 7 years (I have seen both quoted) is a fallacy. It is a very soft guideline but not in any way a strict rule. Again, more important is the overall approach to the gambling venture.

[RS__]

As I’ve understood it, Regnis’s 1-4 are accurate. The same thing was said by an accountant on GWAE on some episode many moons ago.