Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 241

Thread: Dan deleting posts and threads ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I think Dan realizes that without the back and forth trolling posts here the site will quickly delete itself.

    Bob Dancer getting fucked out of 1200.00 dollars, pictures of unknown casinos in unknown places, Redditz talking in Martian and backdoor advertising, Kiwelj with his most outrageous claims of counting blackjack games for 15 years as the invisible man along with endless fairy tales about how he’s making millions, etc. etc.etc.. How much bullshit does he think one could sit back and absorb without responding?

    The only reason alleged self- proclaimed AP’s visit here is to defend other self-proclaimed AP’s. They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns, and how everyone else who don’t claim to be an AP is a fucking idiot.

    Sorry to inform you Dan, but it’s the interesting and funny back and forth trolling that makes anyone even want to come back here.

    You randomly stop in maybe once a month selectively cleaning up a thread or two, but always stop there.

    I’m guessing you realize if you were to monitor the site daily and clean up all of the threads as they go there would be no content and no traffic.
    Last edited by blackhole; 11-16-2018 at 06:26 AM.

  2. #2
    If Dan returned to the site and if he posted more about things like he just did about the Rio, and if "non APs" could ask questions and give their trip reports and discuss their results without being called ploppies then this site just might return to the way it was with dozens of participants (not just the same eight experts) and hundreds if not a thousand or more viewers.

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    If Dan returned to the site and if he posted more about things like he just did about the Rio, and if "non APs" could ask questions and give their trip reports and discuss their results without being called ploppies then this site just might return to the way it was with dozens of participants (not just the same eight experts) and hundreds if not a thousand or more viewers.
    Pot. This is kettle. You're black. The problem, Alan, is you are guilty of continually ridiculing AP's on this site.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    If Dan returned to the site and if he posted more about things like he just did about the Rio, and if "non APs" could ask questions and give their trip reports and discuss their results without being called ploppies then this site just might return to the way it was with dozens of participants (not just the same eight experts) and hundreds if not a thousand or more viewers.
    Pot. This is kettle. You're black. The problem, Alan, is you are guilty of continually ridiculing AP's on this site.
    Do me a favor and list for me my alleged ridicule of APs?

    I can list two challenges. I said I doubt kewlj can really count two tables while playing at one of them. I also said his "accumulating EV" was... well frankly, I just can't sum it up in a few words.

    What else have I ridiculed? And I think ridicule is the wrong word.

    Go ahead mickeycrimm, list them. Now.

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I think Dan realizes that without the back and forth trolling posts here the site will quickly delete itself.

    Bob Dancer getting fucked out of 1200.00 dollars, pictures of unknown casinos in unknown places, Redditz talking in Martian and backdoor advertising, Kiwelj with his most outrageous claims of counting blackjack games for 15 years as the invisible man along with endless fairy tales about how he’s making millions, etc. etc.etc.. How much bullshit does he think one could sit back and absorb without responding?

    The only reason alleged self- proclaimed AP’s visit here is to defend other self-proclaimed AP’s. They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns, and how everyone else who don’t claim to be an AP is a fucking idiot.

    Sorry to inform you Dan, but it’s the interesting and funny back and forth trolling that makes anyone even want to come back here.

    You randomly stop in maybe once a month selectively cleaning up a thread or two, but always stop there.

    I’m guessing you realize if you were to monitor the site daily and clean up all of the threads as they go there would be no content and no traffic.
    Blackhole you should think about a self-ban. AP's talking shop clearly irritates you. You should just go away. Join some other forums.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Blackhole you should think about a self-ban. AP's talking shop clearly irritates you. You should just go away. Join some other forums.
    I already tried to get the gamblers that doubt alleged self-proclaimed AP's to stop posting just to see what happens to the content. No one seems to be interested.

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Blackhole you should think about a self-ban. AP's talking shop clearly irritates you. You should just go away. Join some other forums.
    I already tried to get the gamblers that doubt alleged self-proclaimed AP's to stop posting just to see what happens to the content. No one seems to be interested.
    All the AP's here are doing is talking a little shop. It happens in every occupation. You say you don't believe it's possible but you also run down the occupation. If you don't believe its possible, fine. No one cares. If you don't like the occupation, fine. No one cares. But your trolling of AP's here is purely gratuitous. You get no respect here because you give no respect. Another problem you have is after several disparaging posts you ask a gambling question and want answers. Who in the hell wants to educate someone after being called every name in the book by that someone? You, belly, Singer, all make demands like we owe you something. We don't owe you anything. If you don't believe any of what we write who cares? I certainly don't.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Who in the hell wants to educate someone after being called every name in the book by that someone? You, belly, Singer, all make demands like we owe you something.
    Asking questions is not making demands, and you are by far the most vulgar and prolific name-caller on this forum.

    Your reactions and comebacks are typically juvenile...it's obvious that you live a strange and solitary existence, you must have little to no in-person interaction with adults, and so you don't understand how to behave like an adult.

    The same applies to many of those in your camp...they are immature brats.

    The members here can generally be grouped into 2 camps...those who attack Alan, and those who don't. That's the demarcation line around here, the brats that attack Alan on one side, and everybody else on the other.

    Which camp has the most members whose real names are known, and which camp has the most anonymous members?

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Who in the hell wants to educate someone after being called every name in the book by that someone? You, belly, Singer, all make demands like we owe you something.
    Asking questions is not making demands, and you are by far the most vulgar and prolific name-caller on this forum.

    Your reactions and comebacks are typically juvenile...it's obvious that you live a strange and solitary existence, you must have little to no in-person interaction with adults, and so you don't understand how to behave like an adult.

    The same applies to many of those in your camp...they are immature brats.

    The members here can generally be grouped into 2 camps...those who attack Alan, and those who don't. That's the demarcation line around here, the brats that attack Alan on one side, and everybody else on the other.

    Which camp has the most members whose real names are known, and which camp has the most anonymous members?
    Names known or unknown is irrelevant. You don't post under your real name. But you can lead by example and post your full name and what state you live in if you want to. Your "gotcha" attempts are childish. Shows your immaturity. Rob's continual disparaging of other people is childish and speaks to a mental illness like Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Mendelson continually and childishly makes snide remarks about AP's.

    You and Singer are continually DEMANDING proof of everything. This is especially eggregious by Singer since he has never shown proof of anything. Knowing what his real name is is not proof. We don't owe you anything. Quit DEMANDING.

    My reactions and comebacks are meant for overkill. To let you know that if you fuck with me you are going to get hammered back twice as hard. You like to dish it out but you complain when it blows back on you.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 11-16-2018 at 09:27 AM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  10. #10
    I just went to that R.Singer containment thread where Dan dumps the troll posts. A quick count of the last couple of pages there shows, Mickey 15, Bill Yung 7, Alan 5, Rob 5,

    Looks like Mickey gets the troll trophy.

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I just went to that R.Singer containment thread where Dan dumps the troll posts. A quick count of the last couple of pages there shows, Mickey 15, Bill Yung 7, Alan 5, Rob 5,

    Looks like Mickey gets the troll trophy.
    I'm a target of the other three. They gang up on me. You are part of that gang known as the confederacy of dunces. Don't target me and I won't target you.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  12. #12
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I just went to that R.Singer containment thread where Dan dumps the troll posts. A quick count of the last couple of pages there shows, Mickey 15, Bill Yung 7, Alan 5, Rob 5,

    Looks like Mickey gets the troll trophy.
    I'm a target of the other three. They gang up on me. You are part of that gang known as the confederacy of dunces. Don't target me and I won't target you.
    There are twice as many so-called AP's; and certainly more gamblers than non-gamblers, here.

    Besides, as Coach already noted, asking questions about contradictions and inaccuracies, which you can't answer, isn't trolling.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I just went to that R.Singer containment thread where Dan dumps the troll posts. A quick count of the last couple of pages there shows, Mickey 15, Bill Yung 7, Alan 5, Rob 5,

    Looks like Mickey gets the troll trophy.
    I'm a target of the other three. They gang up on me. You are part of that gang known as the confederacy of dunces. Don't target me and I won't target you.
    There are twice as many so-called AP's; and certainly more gamblers than non-gamblers, here.

    Besides, as Coach already noted, asking questions about contradictions and inaccuracies, which you can't answer, isn't trolling.
    What contradictions and inaccuracies? Its not my problem if you don't understand it. And I'm not fond of explaining things to those that have trolled me. You are a perfect example. No answer is good enough for you. So it's wasted effort to respond to any question you have.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  14. #14
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    No answer is good enough for you.
    Be wary of answers.
    78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns
    Speak for yourself, I have personally benefited financially from things that Mickey, Monet, and others have posted.

  16. #16
    Originally Posted by pepe View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns
    Speak for yourself, I have personally benefited financially from things that Mickey, Monet, and others have posted.
    There is no question that helpful info has been posted. But at the same time certain conditions and warnings and stipulations are missing.

    I'll give a few real examples.

    1. Vulturing abandoned multipliers. Just one time I would like someone to tell us just how many abandoned multipliers they found in a 24 hour period? And what was the multiplier amount that was abandoned? Did anyone find a 10x, an 8x, a 6x?

    2. The true cost of earning free play mailers? Sure it's great to get and use free play, but what did you have to do to get it, and how long does it last when you only play the free play?

    3. Hole carding dealers. Yes, hole carding works if and when you find that sloppy dealer. Just how often do you?

  17. #17
    deleted. duplicate.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  18. #18
    [QUOTE=mickeycrimm;77740]
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    2. The true cost of earning free play mailers? Sure it's great to get and use free play, but what did you have to do to get it, and how long does it last when you only play the free play?
    If you are playing at an advantage to get the freeplay there is no cost. I spend quite a bit of time at a small chain of casinos. I get .2% on the wager straight up. And I also get $75 freeplay a week that is downloaded onto my card. No mail needed. I run about a 15K wager a week. And it is all on the vulturable slot games. Percentagewise it's a sliding scale of advantages I hold. But comparing my wager per week to my actual results per week I hold an overall edge right at 15%. So I'm getting the freeplay for free.

    And I run the freeplay off on those same vulturable games. If I'm on a play where I know the average is about 30 spins at $3 a pop I'll download the freeplay $20 at a time. I don't know the exact spin I will complete the play so I don't want to get in a position where the play is completed and the game is back in negative mode but I still have freeplay to spin off. So I download it in small increments. This way I capture 100% of the value of the freeplay.

    PS: I'm never in the position where I am only playing off the freeplay and leaving.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by pepe View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns
    Speak for yourself, I have personally benefited financially from things that Mickey, Monet, and others have posted.
    Thank you, peepee.

  20. #20
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by pepe View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    They certainly don’t post anything worth reading except the blowing of their own horns
    Speak for yourself, I have personally benefited financially from things that Mickey, Monet, and others have posted.
    Thank you, peepee.
    LMAO. Singer is good for at least one Zinger a day.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Regarding recent trolling threads/messages here
    By Dan Druff in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-10-2018, 11:47 AM
  2. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-17-2018, 05:35 AM
  3. Hundreds of Threads.......
    By mr jjj in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 08-28-2013, 09:14 PM
  4. NEW POLICY: I'm now deleting posts.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-06-2013, 08:46 AM
  5. Kneeland No Longer Posts?
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 08:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •