Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 101 to 117 of 117

Thread: Sequential Royal hit at Red Rock $217,592

  1. #101
    Platinum
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Stumptown
    Posts
    1,881
    Christ on a crutch, you're reanimating that hoary chestnut, DI.

    Just let it alone, 'K?
    What, Me Worry?

  2. #102
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I am sure there are some APs who make money, just as I am sure there are a few people who successfully influence dice. Just as I question the claims of so many people who believe they are DIs I also question the claims of so many who say they are APs.

    Don't you find it a bit curious that we have on this forum a half dozen or so APs who are overall winners including one legendary mickeycrimm who never had a losing year or was it never had a losing month or a losing week?

    Give credit to Rob Singer who openly admits to huge losses before developing his system... which I still don't know or follow. And give credit to kewlj who admits to losses that if happened to me would put me in a comatose state.

    But the rest of you... you don't lose? Okay. Carry on.

    Because we have you Alan to do more than enough of it to make up for all of us.

    And not one person on here has ever said they never lose. Big difference between never have a losing year and never losing. But again that comes back to math, something you pretend to not understand.

  3. #103
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Sorry Mick ... sworn to secrecy. So, fuck-off.

    We actually meet up in Vegas and he's a hell of a nice and funny guy.
    You don't have to say where the play is. You can give general information like....is it a video poker play? What is the bet amount? What is the calculated edge? So far you haven't put up anything that shows you weren't sold a bag of goods.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  4. #104
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Man are you guys confused. If anyone sits down and plays any particular vp play--whether it's +1%, +2.5% -2% or whatever, you're doing nothing more than making a short-term play within that machine's long-term life. And if you hop around to casinos all the time only playing what you call "plays with an edge" on these machines--thereby concocting the fallible but feel-good scenario that you are somehow always playing in "positive play/long-term" territory--you are only fooling yourselves and you know it.

    There is no "grind it out" ap-scenario that scares any casino (thus, the CONSTANT ap-luring promotions)
    Why don't you contact Boyd and explain to them how they are messing up by chasing off all the AP's.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  5. #105
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Man are you guys confused. If anyone sits down and plays any particular vp play--whether it's +1%, +2.5% -2% or whatever, you're doing nothing more than making a short-term play within that machine's long-term life. And if you hop around to casinos all the time only playing what you call "plays with an edge" on these machines--thereby concocting the fallible but feel-good scenario that you are somehow always playing in "positive play/long-term" territory--you are only fooling yourselves and you know it.

    At no time is anyone ever always playing with an advantage over any machine, regardless of the "theoretical". You simply enter into a machine's life cycle on a session-by-session basis, and HOPE you are there during a positive portion of that cycle. The overall pay table expectation has absolutely nothing to do with the relatively miniscule amount of time you are playing your session.

    So to make believe an AP "only plays when they have a theoretical edge" and that they and everybody else only plays in the "long-term" when we have zero idea of where any particular machine resides at within its life cycle, is both misleading, misguided, and is extremely disingenuous.

    The reason a player such as myself has been so successful playing mostly slightly negative games is because I'm educated enough--and far more than most of you--to understand AND ACCEPT the reality of the situation that vp players face. That Doctrine states, as much as most self-proclaimed "AP" hate to agree with it, that "No current hand, session, or machine has anything at all to do with any hand, session, or machine that has been dealt and/or played before, or is yet to bet dealt and/or played". IE, every session any vp player ever plays is always and only a short-term endeavor.

    There is no "grind it out" ap-scenario that scares any casino (thus, the CONSTANT ap-luring promotions) or that makes any kind of sense. If you're gonna play with no specific strategy like mine, you play intelligently and a lot, and hope that good luck takes its place more often on the good part of the Bell Curve than bad luck does. And that is the only way any regular player has a chance to win over time--recreational or pro or whatever.

    You people need to wise up. You toss around all the simple math as if YOU'RE the ones who've come up with it. Wake up dummies--the CASINOS came up with it first, and they use it automatically--and not systematically.

    You people are only fooling yourselves.
    Rob has a fundamental misunderstanding of how random number generators work.

    Random is not cyclical.
    Cyclical is not random.

    "Cycle" is just a term used to describe a measure of hands. If one says they have hit 3 quads in 1 cycle they are saying they have hit 3 quads in about 425 hands.

    To say that RNG's are cyclical is like saying the dice are cyclical. Dice have no memory and neither does the RNG. It doesn't know it dealt you the Jack of Spades.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  6. #106
    Re: mickeycrimm....it's "never had a losing DAY" alan.

    There's only two reliable things you or anybody can glean out of a forum like this. First, if the poster has a known and verifiable real name, there's a very good chance those people are, by and large, telling you the truth about themselves, and any criticisms or tough questions they levy towards others are the result of a clear, educated, and intelligent process of thought in their honest quest for what is actually going on.

    Secondly, if the poster posts under an anonymous handle for the purpose of not wanting their real names ever be known, there's more than a good chance they do so in order to tell untruths, brag about things that can never be verified, make up countless stories about themselves and anyone they disagree with, and pretend that they are God's gift to gambling knowledge, information, and to anybody who gambles --and all with the comfortable and cowardly feeling of immunity.

    That's all this stuff is in a nutshell, and it will never be any different. So the only way to keep up with these anonymous (AP's in this case) posters is to either frustrate the hell out of them (Alan) or insult the hell out of them (yours truly). And in Dan's (Todd's position) it's confuse the hell out of them.

    It's important to note that there are far more people who read these posts than contribute to them. That's because most normal/regular people don't have the stomach for this type of atmosphere. I've been contacted all the time over the years by hundreds if not more people who read this forum and have legitimate strategy questions, while still others say how much they enjoy my smackdown of the phonies. And some REALLY REALLY love the many different ways I've utilized to undress mickeycrimm in his own, and only, world.

    So just take what you can out of all this and improve your life experience if you're young. If you're not, then simply enjoy the ride.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 12-20-2018 at 09:24 AM.

  7. #107
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Man are you guys confused. If anyone sits down and plays any particular vp play--whether it's +1%, +2.5% -2% or whatever, you're doing nothing more than making a short-term play within that machine's long-term life. And if you hop around to casinos all the time only playing what you call "plays with an edge" on these machines--thereby concocting the fallible but feel-good scenario that you are somehow always playing in "positive play/long-term" territory--you are only fooling yourselves and you know it.

    At no time is anyone ever always playing with an advantage over any machine, regardless of the "theoretical". You simply enter into a machine's life cycle on a session-by-session basis, and HOPE you are there during a positive portion of that cycle. The overall pay table expectation has absolutely nothing to do with the relatively miniscule amount of time you are playing your session.

    So to make believe an AP "only plays when they have a theoretical edge" and that they and everybody else only plays in the "long-term" when we have zero idea of where any particular machine resides at within its life cycle, is both misleading, misguided, and is extremely disingenuous.

    The reason a player such as myself has been so successful playing mostly slightly negative games is because I'm educated enough--and far more than most of you--to understand AND ACCEPT the reality of the situation that vp players face. That Doctrine states, as much as most self-proclaimed "AP" hate to agree with it, that "No current hand, session, or machine has anything at all to do with any hand, session, or machine that has been dealt and/or played before, or is yet to bet dealt and/or played". IE, every session any vp player ever plays is always and only a short-term endeavor.

    There is no "grind it out" ap-scenario that scares any casino (thus, the CONSTANT ap-luring promotions) or that makes any kind of sense. If you're gonna play with no specific strategy like mine, you play intelligently and a lot, and hope that good luck takes its place more often on the good part of the Bell Curve than bad luck does. And that is the only way any regular player has a chance to win over time--recreational or pro or whatever.

    You people need to wise up. You toss around all the simple math as if YOU'RE the ones who've come up with it. Wake up dummies--the CASINOS came up with it first, and they use it automatically--and not systematically.

    You people are only fooling yourselves.
    Rob has a fundamental misunderstanding of how random number generators work.

    Random is not cyclical.
    Cyclical is not random.

    "Cycle" is just a term used to describe a measure of hands. If one says they have hit 3 quads in 1 cycle they are saying they have hit 3 quads in about 425 hands.

    To say that RNG's are cyclical is like saying the dice are cyclical. Dice have no memory and neither does the RNG. It doesn't know it dealt you the Jack of Spades.
    I knew the logic of what I posted would make your mind work overtime mickey. But unfortunately, that lack of any type of diploma or meaningful life experiences keeps coming back to haunt you, and you have wasted your time with this post. It completely misses the mark, and it's as if you're posting something right out of space man redietz' playbook.

  8. #108
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Re: mickeycrimm....it's "never had a losing DAY" alan.

    There's only two reliable things you or anybody can glean out of a forum like this is. First, if the poster has a known and verifiable real name, there's a very good chance those people are, by andlarge, telling you the truth about themselves, and any criticisms or tough questions they levy towards others are the result of a clear, educated, and intelligent process of thought in their honest quest for what is actually going on.

    Secondly, if the poster posts under an anonymous handle for the purpose of not wanting their real names ever be known, there's more than a good chance they do so in order to tell untruths, brag about things that can never be verified, make up countless stories about themselves and anyone they disagree with, and pretend that they are God's gift to gambling knowledge, information, and to anybody who gambles.

    That's all this stuff is in a nutshell, and it will never be any different. So the only way to keep up with these anonymous (AP's in this case) posters is to either frustrate the hell out of them (Alan) or insult the hell out of them (yours truly). And in Dan's (Todd's position) it's confuse the hell out of them.

    It's important to note that there are far more people who read these posts than contribute to them. That's because most normal/regular people don't have the stomach for this type of atmosphere. I've been contacted all the time over the years here by hundreds of not more people who read this forum and have legitimate strategy questions, while still others say how much they enjoy my smackdown of the phonies. And some REALLY REALLY love the many different ways I've utilized to undress mickeycrimm in his own, and only, world.

    So just take what you can out of all this and improve your life experience if you're young. If you're not, then simply enjoy the ride.
    Fingering your nub of a cock so much, might not be healthy.

  9. #109
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Re: mickeycrimm....it's "never had a losing DAY" alan.

    There's only two reliable things you or anybody can glean out of a forum like this. First, if the poster has a known and verifiable real name, there's a very good chance those people are, by and large, telling you the truth about themselves, and any criticisms or tough questions they levy towards others are the result of a clear, educated, and intelligent process of thought in their honest quest for what is actually going on.

    Secondly, if the poster posts under an anonymous handle for the purpose of not wanting their real names ever be known, there's more than a good chance they do so in order to tell untruths, brag about things that can never be verified, make up countless stories about themselves and anyone they disagree with, and pretend that they are God's gift to gambling knowledge, information, and to anybody who gambles --and all with the comfortable and cowardly feeling of immunity.

    That's all this stuff is in a nutshell, and it will never be any different. So the only way to keep up with these anonymous (AP's in this case) posters is to either frustrate the hell out of them (Alan) or insult the hell out of them (yours truly). And in Dan's (Todd's position) it's confuse the hell out of them.

    It's important to note that there are far more people who read these posts than contribute to them. That's because most normal/regular people don't have the stomach for this type of atmosphere. I've been contacted all the time over the years by hundreds if not more people who read this forum and have legitimate strategy questions, while still others say how much they enjoy my smackdown of the phonies. And some REALLY REALLY love the many different ways I've utilized to undress mickeycrimm in his own, and only, world.

    So just take what you can out of all this and improve your life experience if you're young. If you're not, then simply enjoy the ride.
    You published your books under an alias. You didn't want anyone to know who you really are. Fuck Alan's "it's a pen name" bullshit. Any cop, prosecutor or judge will say Rob Singer is an alias. You kept your real name under wraps. Arcimedes exposed who you really are years ago. You're a phony bag of shit.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  10. #110
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Man are you guys confused. If anyone sits down and plays any particular vp play--whether it's +1%, +2.5% -2% or whatever, you're doing nothing more than making a short-term play within that machine's long-term life. And if you hop around to casinos all the time only playing what you call "plays with an edge" on these machines--thereby concocting the fallible but feel-good scenario that you are somehow always playing in "positive play/long-term" territory--you are only fooling yourselves and you know it.

    At no time is anyone ever always playing with an advantage over any machine, regardless of the "theoretical". You simply enter into a machine's life cycle on a session-by-session basis, and HOPE you are there during a positive portion of that cycle. The overall pay table expectation has absolutely nothing to do with the relatively miniscule amount of time you are playing your session.

    So to make believe an AP "only plays when they have a theoretical edge" and that they and everybody else only plays in the "long-term" when we have zero idea of where any particular machine resides at within its life cycle, is both misleading, misguided, and is extremely disingenuous.

    The reason a player such as myself has been so successful playing mostly slightly negative games is because I'm educated enough--and far more than most of you--to understand AND ACCEPT the reality of the situation that vp players face. That Doctrine states, as much as most self-proclaimed "AP" hate to agree with it, that "No current hand, session, or machine has anything at all to do with any hand, session, or machine that has been dealt and/or played before, or is yet to bet dealt and/or played". IE, every session any vp player ever plays is always and only a short-term endeavor.

    There is no "grind it out" ap-scenario that scares any casino (thus, the CONSTANT ap-luring promotions) or that makes any kind of sense. If you're gonna play with no specific strategy like mine, you play intelligently and a lot, and hope that good luck takes its place more often on the good part of the Bell Curve than bad luck does. And that is the only way any regular player has a chance to win over time--recreational or pro or whatever.

    You people need to wise up. You toss around all the simple math as if YOU'RE the ones who've come up with it. Wake up dummies--the CASINOS came up with it first, and they use it automatically--and not systematically.

    You people are only fooling yourselves.
    Rob has a fundamental misunderstanding of how random number generators work.

    Random is not cyclical.
    Cyclical is not random.

    "Cycle" is just a term used to describe a measure of hands. If one says they have hit 3 quads in 1 cycle they are saying they have hit 3 quads in about 425 hands.

    To say that RNG's are cyclical is like saying the dice are cyclical. Dice have no memory and neither does the RNG. It doesn't know it dealt you the Jack of Spades.
    I knew the logic of what I posted would make your mind work overtime mickey. But unfortunately, that lack of any type of diploma or meaningful life experiences keeps coming back to haunt you, and you have wasted your time with this post. It completely misses the mark, and it's as if you're posting something right out of space man redietz' playbook.
    Your problem is all the educated, degree'd people agree with me, not you. You're nothing but sychobabble voodoo.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  11. #111
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Re: mickeycrimm....it's "never had a losing DAY" alan.

    There's only two reliable things you or anybody can glean out of a forum like this. First, if the poster has a known and verifiable real name, there's a very good chance those people are, by and large, telling you the truth about themselves, and any criticisms or tough questions they levy towards others are the result of a clear, educated, and intelligent process of thought in their honest quest for what is actually going on.

    Secondly, if the poster posts under an anonymous handle for the purpose of not wanting their real names ever be known, there's more than a good chance they do so in order to tell untruths, brag about things that can never be verified, make up countless stories about themselves and anyone they disagree with, and pretend that they are God's gift to gambling knowledge, information, and to anybody who gambles --and all with the comfortable and cowardly feeling of immunity.

    That's all this stuff is in a nutshell, and it will never be any different. So the only way to keep up with these anonymous (AP's in this case) posters is to either frustrate the hell out of them (Alan) or insult the hell out of them (yours truly). And in Dan's (Todd's position) it's confuse the hell out of them.

    It's important to note that there are far more people who read these posts than contribute to them. That's because most normal/regular people don't have the stomach for this type of atmosphere. I've been contacted all the time over the years by hundreds if not more people who read this forum and have legitimate strategy questions, while still others say how much they enjoy my smackdown of the phonies. And some REALLY REALLY love the many different ways I've utilized to undress mickeycrimm in his own, and only, world.

    So just take what you can out of all this and improve your life experience if you're young. If you're not, then simply enjoy the ride.
    You published your books under an alias. You didn't want anyone to know who you really are. Fuck Alan's "it's a pen name" bullshit. Any cop, prosecutor or judge will say Rob Singer is an alias. You kept your real name under wraps. Arcimedes exposed who you really are years ago. You're a phony bag of shit.
    Calm down mickey and you'll live longer (although for what purpose I have no idea.... ) My first book was released in 2001. My website began in 2000, which throughout its 10-yr. life included an autobiography of my real name and background. The same info appeared in one of my earliest GT columns. I would think using a pen name for a book is something your 6th grade mind would be able to grasp, but since you have never read an entire book cover-to-cover, I accept that your dummy act is really not a dummy act.

  12. #112
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Rob has a fundamental misunderstanding of how random number generators work.

    Random is not cyclical.
    Cyclical is not random.

    "Cycle" is just a term used to describe a measure of hands. If one says they have hit 3 quads in 1 cycle they are saying they have hit 3 quads in about 425 hands.

    To say that RNG's are cyclical is like saying the dice are cyclical. Dice have no memory and neither does the RNG. It doesn't know it dealt you the Jack of Spades.
    I knew the logic of what I posted would make your mind work overtime mickey. But unfortunately, that lack of any type of diploma or meaningful life experiences keeps coming back to haunt you, and you have wasted your time with this post. It completely misses the mark, and it's as if you're posting something right out of space man redietz' playbook.
    Your problem is all the educated, degree'd people agree with me, not you. You're nothing but sychobabble voodoo.
    Now THAT'S funny You do that every time you have no answers sent to you from the bottom of the bottle.

  13. #113
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    I knew the logic of what I posted would make your mind work overtime mickey. But unfortunately, that lack of any type of diploma or meaningful life experiences keeps coming back to haunt you, and you have wasted your time with this post. It completely misses the mark, and it's as if you're posting something right out of space man redietz' playbook.
    Your problem is all the educated, degree'd people agree with me, not you. You're nothing but sychobabble voodoo.
    Now THAT'S funny You do that every time you have no answers sent to you from the bottom of the bottle.
    A lot of people on vpFREE and WoV are all degree'd up a hell of a lot more than you. And they agree with me. But go ahead and continue living in your fantasy.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  14. #114
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Re: mickeycrimm....it's "never had a losing DAY" alan.

    There's only two reliable things you or anybody can glean out of a forum like this. First, if the poster has a known and verifiable real name, there's a very good chance those people are, by and large, telling you the truth about themselves, and any criticisms or tough questions they levy towards others are the result of a clear, educated, and intelligent process of thought in their honest quest for what is actually going on.

    Secondly, if the poster posts under an anonymous handle for the purpose of not wanting their real names ever be known, there's more than a good chance they do so in order to tell untruths, brag about things that can never be verified, make up countless stories about themselves and anyone they disagree with, and pretend that they are God's gift to gambling knowledge, information, and to anybody who gambles --and all with the comfortable and cowardly feeling of immunity.

    That's all this stuff is in a nutshell, and it will never be any different. So the only way to keep up with these anonymous (AP's in this case) posters is to either frustrate the hell out of them (Alan) or insult the hell out of them (yours truly). And in Dan's (Todd's position) it's confuse the hell out of them.

    It's important to note that there are far more people who read these posts than contribute to them. That's because most normal/regular people don't have the stomach for this type of atmosphere. I've been contacted all the time over the years by hundreds if not more people who read this forum and have legitimate strategy questions, while still others say how much they enjoy my smackdown of the phonies. And some REALLY REALLY love the many different ways I've utilized to undress mickeycrimm in his own, and only, world.

    So just take what you can out of all this and improve your life experience if you're young. If you're not, then simply enjoy the ride.
    You published your books under an alias. You didn't want anyone to know who you really are. Fuck Alan's "it's a pen name" bullshit. Any cop, prosecutor or judge will say Rob Singer is an alias. You kept your real name under wraps. Arcimedes exposed who you really are years ago. You're a phony bag of shit.
    Calm down mickey and you'll live longer (although for what purpose I have no idea.... ) My first book was released in 2001. My website began in 2000, which throughout its 10-yr. life included an autobiography of my real name and background. The same info appeared in one of my earliest GT columns. I would think using a pen name for a book is something your 6th grade mind would be able to grasp, but since you have never read an entire book cover-to-cover, I accept that your dummy act is really not a dummy act.
    Cop filling out police report:

    Cop: Do you use any other names besides Robert Harry Argentino?
    Argentino: Yes, my pen name is Rob Singer.

    Cop writes Rob Singer in the aliases box.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  15. #115
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Your problem is all the educated, degree'd people agree with me, not you. You're nothing but sychobabble voodoo.
    Now THAT'S funny You do that every time you have no answers sent to you from the bottom of the bottle.
    A lot of people on vpFREE and WoV are all degree'd up a hell of a lot more than you. And they agree with me. But go ahead and continue living in your fantasy.
    Have you noticed how you turn to making up scenarios--most of them delirious--whenever your dumb posts get painted into a corner?

    Get an education mickey. It's the only way you can stop getting made a fool of.

  16. #116
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Now THAT'S funny You do that every time you have no answers sent to you from the bottom of the bottle.
    A lot of people on vpFREE and WoV are all degree'd up a hell of a lot more than you. And they agree with me. But go ahead and continue living in your fantasy.
    Have you noticed how you turn to making up scenarios--most of them delirious--whenever your dumb posts get painted into a corner?

    Get an education mickey. It's the only way you can stop getting made a fool of.
    I have a much more extensive education in gambling than you. It's not even a contest. All you do is spew ignorant blather. In gambling you are as uneducated as they come. It will never change either because you are to stupid to learn it.
    The hard left considers run of the mill liberals to be usefull idiots.

  17. #117
    My Christmas wish is for everyone to stop responding to Rob.

    #FreeTyde

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sequential Reversible Royal machine ($210k jackpot)
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 11-11-2018, 11:45 PM
  2. IT problem at Red Rock
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-30-2018, 08:28 PM
  3. Your thoughts on Red Rock
    By ThreeCardPoker in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 02-02-2017, 09:46 AM
  4. Tahoe labor day weekend trip report: A sequential royal saves trip
    By FABismonte in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-19-2016, 12:28 PM
  5. Huge Progressive Jackpots for Sequential Royals
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-12-2015, 12:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •