Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 117

Thread: Sequential Royal hit at Red Rock $217,592

  1. #41
    Mickey don't start pulling individual lines from Rob's post to make an argument.

    What we have here is that an INDIVIDUAL hit the jackpot and he made a good play. That's all. Rob is saying the same thing too.

    Just admit it. The lucky player got lucky. It was a good play for him. It didn't matter what the math said, he got the damn sequential royal.

    It's done. You can kick and scream all you want but this guy won it. Good play for him.

    Geezus.

  2. #42
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickey don't start pulling individual lines from Rob's post to make an argument.

    What we have here is that an INDIVIDUAL hit the jackpot and he made a good play. That's all. Rob is saying the same thing too.

    Just admit it. The lucky player got lucky. It was a good play for him. It didn't matter what the math said, he got the damn sequential royal.

    It's done. You can kick and scream all you want but this guy won it. Good play for him.

    Geezus.
    Everything you say here is just fucking irrelevant. Now go suck Rob's little pee pee....again.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #43
    You're sick mickeycrimm. It's your argument that is irrelevant. You just can't say that some guy got lucky, can you? It's just like when I was dealt quad 7s on that hundred play machine at Suncoast. The first comment from Axel was about the paytable.

    Look... it didn't matter what the frigging pay table was after I was dealt 7777 on a hundred play VP machine and it didn't matter what the frigging paytable was to the guy who won the $217,000 sequential royal. And you know what? It doesn't matter if you'll concede that or not because I got the quad sevens and that lucky guy got the $217,000. Now, go back to your jealous whining because that's all it is.

  4. #44
    Alan, I do believe mickey realizes he would indeed have a whopper on his hands if he went up to the guy that hit this royal and told him "hey, you're nothing but a sucker who'll give it all back and more anyway, because you're not a savvy ap like me who wouldn't have played that stupid progressive in the first place".

    It wouldn't take the usual four drinks to put mickey on the floor in this scenario.

  5. #45
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    You're sick mickeycrimm. It's your argument that is irrelevant. You just can't say that some guy got lucky, can you? It's just like when I was dealt quad 7s on that hundred play machine at Suncoast. The first comment from Axel was about the paytable.

    Look... it didn't matter what the frigging pay table was after I was dealt 7777 on a hundred play VP machine and it didn't matter what the frigging paytable was to the guy who won the $217,000 sequential royal. And you know what? It doesn't matter if you'll concede that or not because I got the quad sevens and that lucky guy got the $217,000. Now, go back to your jealous whining because that's all it is.
    This might be as stupid as ap argument as when I posted my $100k royal in my GT column after tossing 3 queens and holding 3rf cards. It put me up around $96k for my session, yet the idiot ap's could only cry about "how much that play cost me!!" One fool even told the GT editor that I really "lost money overall!"

    Now I can see why they would never make that play, but none of them use a true strategy either that would call for a rare, gutsy play like that either. These morons just don't get it.

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    You're sick mickeycrimm. It's your argument that is irrelevant. You just can't say that some guy got lucky, can you? It's just like when I was dealt quad 7s on that hundred play machine at Suncoast. The first comment from Axel was about the paytable.

    Look... it didn't matter what the frigging pay table was after I was dealt 7777 on a hundred play VP machine and it didn't matter what the frigging paytable was to the guy who won the $217,000 sequential royal. And you know what? It doesn't matter if you'll concede that or not because I got the quad sevens and that lucky guy got the $217,000. Now, go back to your jealous whining because that's all it is.
    You are really being stupid and obnoxious. I said some guy got lucky. Quit making shit up. Only two weeks to go before you can try and get lucky again. What do you do when you are sitting out the month?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  7. #47
    Grow up mickeycrimm.

  8. #48
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Grow up mickeycrimm.
    No, you grow up.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #49
    Oh okay mickey, you win. I'm going to work now.

  10. #50
    Gentlemen, gentlemen: is there no common ground here?

    Try this: The fellow at Red Rock, just like people who bet and win a jackpot at Megabucks, chose to play a gambling game where the odds were against him; through variance / luck he won.

    Instead of a "good play" he had a "good pay."
    What, Me Worry?

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Gentlemen, gentlemen: is there no common ground here?

    Try this: The fellow at Red Rock, just like people who bet and win a jackpot at Megabucks, chose to play a gambling game where the odds were against him; through variance / luck he won.

    Instead of a "good play" he had a "good pay."
    Very good.

  12. #52
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Oh okay mickey, you win. I'm going to work now.
    Losing the money you owe your son at VP is now called “work”? Or are you going to earn some money to lose at VP and Craps?

    Thanks in advance for helping me understand this.

  13. #53
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by BadBeet View Post
    I've never seen a "sequential" machine that was not also "reversible"

    Order of the deck (in any game is)

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J Q K A
    I beg to differ, but ironically A can also be low as well as high.
    Yes. Unless declared otherwise it is higher than a deuce. Lowball, razz, etc... Ace is low... 2-7 games and everything else Ace is High.

  14. #54
    What about five high straights? In any poker or video poker game there are 5 high straights.

  15. #55
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    What about five high straights? In any poker or video poker game there are 5 high straights.
    Why are you being so nit picky about this a 5 high straight is beaten by a Royal flush or even an Ace high straight... the Ace can be considered low but the Ace is still considered high if it's not part of that straight so that Ace is higher than king.

    Unless the Ace is considered LOW it is highest card in the deck.

  16. #56
    I'm simply pointing out that aces can be high or low cards. What's the problem?

    You said:

    "Order of the deck (in any game is)

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J Q K A"

    BUT... in actual play the ace can be low. This has nothing to do with royals or sequential royals it's just stating a fact about poker.

    Again what's the problem?

  17. #57
    Ok... I'll change it to say order of the deck unless ace is declared low... geeeze....

  18. #58
    Originally Posted by BadBeet View Post
    I've never seen a "sequential" machine that was not also "reversible"

    Order of the deck (in any game is)

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J Q K A

    Ranking in order of Clubs, Diamonds, Hearts, Spades.


    Has anyone seen the full image of the royal? I do not see the 5th card... (using my detective skills it is the 10 of Spades)... Was this guy dealt 3 or 4 to the royal? If it was 4 to the royal, how long do we think he sat there praying for it to fill in?
    To please Sir Alan...

    I want to be clear that Ace is considered high unless specifically declared as Low and can not be counted as High in that game.

  19. #59
    Everyone is so defensive on this forum... and if they're not defensive then they are attacking someone else. Sorry, I'm sick of it. This used to be a place where there could be interesting discussions. Now it's a fucking cesspool.

  20. #60
    Oh for heavens sake. In every fucking poker or video poker game an ace can be high or low. That's one reason an ace is so valuable. Even in Mexican Poker an ace is high and low and Mexican Poker isn't even played with a full deck.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sequential Reversible Royal machine ($210k jackpot)
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 11-12-2018, 12:45 AM
  2. IT problem at Red Rock
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-30-2018, 09:28 PM
  3. Your thoughts on Red Rock
    By ThreeCardPoker in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 02-02-2017, 10:46 AM
  4. Tahoe labor day weekend trip report: A sequential royal saves trip
    By FABismonte in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-19-2016, 01:28 PM
  5. Huge Progressive Jackpots for Sequential Royals
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-12-2015, 01:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •