Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71314151617181920 LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 392

Thread: APs Wrongly Prosecuted - Keno - They're Suing Harrah's

  1. #321
    Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    You continue to compare your using multiple handles to my returning to a forum I was banned from to warn players about casino cheating. You by your own admission, use different handles to hide who you are/were and throw people off. To play people.
    Kj, you are misquoting me and you know it. I said I came on this site with a different handle then I had at BTJF so I could get a decent answer from Moses about his counting system. So yes, if you want to call that throwing someone off, I guess you could say that. If it makes you feel better to say that, then go ahead.

    But I have never used different handles to “play people”. Show me one example where I have done that. Even Bosox has said all my handles are “consistent”. He said I have never taken different sides with my different handles. I have never “played you”. When you say something I agree with you, I say I agree with you. When you say something, I don’t agree with, I let you know I don’t agree with you. I don’t check to see what my handle is because it doesn’t matter to me.

    If you’re going to accuse me of “playing people” you need to step up and show me how I’ve done that. Yes, I went onto different sites with different handles but there was no master plan behind it. I actually used my real name in the first forum I joined since I didn’t know that would be my handle. I had to ask the moderator to change it and he did.

    What you did is much worse than anything I’ve done. You used a sock puppet to get on a site your were banned. But in the AP ethics book this probably is okay. You still haven’t posted the AP ethics code. I’m waiting.
    What can I say Bob you are an underhanded sneak'y fuck who goes around using multi handles to hide for an indeterminate time frame it takes for others to try and figure out, and literally insult the hands that feed you advice. Bio 32, How many more AP,s are you going to secretly stab in the back do you need to satisfy you? You asshole, who likes to hear Moses jokes, fuck he likes your jokes, why don't you play him, fight him, and join up on the zen zone. Actually I would not wish you on anyone as you are truly one demented troll, and Moses will figure that out.

    Bob21:

    "When you say something I agree with you, I say I agree with you. When you say something, I don’t agree with, I let you know I don’t agree with you. I don’t check to see what my handle is because it doesn’t matter to me."

    You expect people to believe you don't know what handle you are using at any particular time, or there is no reason or intent for doing this? I hope tater catches up with you and turns you into a can of SPAM.

    Bio32 wrote on bj info:

    "Excellent post Rattle1! I wasn’t going to weigh in on this topic since it’s such a ridicules claim (for all the reasons you’ve already mentioned) that I can’t believe any intelligent person believes it."

    “Beast Mode” is one of the more amusing things APs have come up with. The funny thing is there are some APs that actually think they have exploited it. I don’t know who are dumber, the APs that believe in “beast mode” or the ones who think they have exploited it. Lol."


    Beast mode was someone else's term, but in your mind the dumb stupid person that you were referring to anonymously you consistently praised on other boards for helping. You do not see a problem with that move, let's see how all this turns out in the future troll face.

  2. #322
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    You continue to compare your using multiple handles to my returning to a forum I was banned from to warn players about casino cheating. You by your own admission, use different handles to hide who you are/were and throw people off. To play people.
    Kj, you are misquoting me and you know it. I said I came on this site with a different handle then I had at BTJF so I could get a decent answer from Moses about his counting system. So yes, if you want to call that throwing someone off, I guess you could say that. If it makes you feel better to say that, then go ahead.

    But I have never used different handles to “play people”. Show me one example where I have done that. Even Bosox has said all my handles are “consistent”. He said I have never taken different sides with my different handles. I have never “played you”. When you say something I agree with you, I say I agree with you. When you say something, I don’t agree with, I let you know I don’t agree with you. I don’t check to see what my handle is because it doesn’t matter to me.

    If you’re going to accuse me of “playing people” you need to step up and show me how I’ve done that. Yes, I went onto different sites with different handles but there was no master plan behind it. I actually used my real name in the first forum I joined since I didn’t know that would be my handle. I had to ask the moderator to change it and he did.

    What you did is much worse than anything I’ve done. You used a sock puppet to get on a site your were banned. But in the AP ethics book this probably is okay. You still haven’t posted the AP ethics code. I’m waiting.
    What can I say Bob you are an underhanded sneak'y fuck who goes around using multi handles to hide for an indeterminate time frame it takes for others to try and figure out, and literally insult the hands that feed you advice. Bio 32, How many more AP,s are you going to secretly stab in the back do you need to satisfy you? You asshole, who likes to hear Moses jokes, fuck he likes your jokes, why don't you play him, fight him, and join up on the zen zone. Actually I would not wish you on anyone as you are truly one demented troll, and Moses will figure that out.

    Bob21:

    "When you say something I agree with you, I say I agree with you. When you say something, I don’t agree with, I let you know I don’t agree with you. I don’t check to see what my handle is because it doesn’t matter to me."

    You expect people to believe you don't know what handle you are using at any particular time, or there is no reason or intent for doing this? I hope tater catches up with you and turns you into a can of SPAM.

    Bio32 wrote on bj info:

    "Excellent post Rattle1! I wasn’t going to weigh in on this topic since it’s such a ridicules claim (for all the reasons you’ve already mentioned) that I can’t believe any intelligent person believes it."

    “Beast Mode” is one of the more amusing things APs have come up with. The funny thing is there are some APs that actually think they have exploited it. I don’t know who are dumber, the APs that believe in “beast mode” or the ones who think they have exploited it. Lol."


    Beast mode was someone else's term, but in your mind the dumb stupid person that you were referring to anonymously you consistently praised on other boards for helping. You do not see a problem with that move, let's see how all this turns out in the future troll face.
    Moses won’t figure anything out except how to gain access into Tater’s pants....reasoning and intelligent thinking are as foreign to him as running water and a bar of soap

  3. #323
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    For the record, I don't have much of an issue with Mr. Mendelson reneging on the package thing. I wrote section notes for him before he decided he didn't want to read the stuff, so that annoyed the hell out of me, but his not wanting it is understandable. To me, what isn't kosher is his refusal to say something like, "Rob's my friend. I didn't want to be the one to prove he's lying. So I have to pass." Or maybe, "I committed a video to Rob. It'll make me look really bad if I'm the one who helps debunk him."

    Make some reasonable public (or private) statement like that. No, instead it was a song and dance. Now I'm sure Mr. Mendelson doesn't really think Argentino has a $1.5 million RV sitting in South Dakota that he never drives. But instead of turning a jaded eye to that, we get the jaded eye turned to counting two tables.

    One problem with the whole package deal is that it appears as if Mr. Mendelson was testing me. He gives an address and says send it. I immediately say, "Yay!" He shortly thereafter pulls a Roseanne Roseannadanna and says, "Never mind." It sure looks like a no risk test to see if I'm making stuff up. This is another "not kosher" aspect.

    For a lot of the anti-APs here, I'm reminded of an old Jerry Tarkanian story. Tarkanian noted that, "The NCAA is so mad at Kentucky, they'll slap another two years probation on Cleveland State."

    That's the way it's been here. The more demonstrably false Argentino's statements become, the more the confederacy goes after the AP storylines. It is goddamn weird. One would think a journalist like Mr. Mendelson or seemingly successful businesspeople (as blackhole and coach belly present themselves) would turn their debunking attention to things that appear least likely. But that's not how it works. It's just very, very strange. I mean, whatever you think, kewlJ and mickeycrimm have shown considerable expertise in their respective specialties. Argentino hasn't demonstrated expertise in anything. And somehow that's reason to give him a pass.

    This gives me an excuse to recommend a book by Tom Nichols called "The Death of Expertise." It explores some of these issues.

    Note: I realize Argentino probably counts my recommending a book as a solicitation. LOL. Only if you buy it. Go to your library.
    You're a big boy, redietz. Fight your own battles.

    Here's an idea: post your own stuff on the forum.

    As I told you almost two years ago: I told Rob Singer I believed you and I even posted it here multiple times that I believed you.

    I also told you to ignore Rob Singer. Why can't you do that? There are forum members here I've been ignoring and as of today there are new additions to the list of blocked forum members.

    Again, remember this PM? Do you think you were a bit obsessed about this package of years and years of articles that no one else asked to read?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #324
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post

    Listen here Tard. He is saying he wouldn't have bothered answering. Not that the answer would be different.
    Then you’ve made my point for me. Thank you! I did the right thing by having different handles on different forums. You’re basically saying this is the only way you’ll get a decent answer from someone.

    Since I didn’t agree with kj on mindplay and beast mode, you’re saying he wouldn’t have answered any of my questions. That’s kind of sad that two APs can’t disgree with each other on some topic, and still ask each other questions. Is this in the AP code of conduct manual?

    As for Bosox’s question, I only have 256 more handles. On some forums, 80% of the handles are me. Good luck in figuring it all out. It even has me a little confused. This will keep Bobo occupied for a while, since he’s consumed with this stuff. Lol

    And Moses those were the kindest and most intelligent words I’ve read in a while on any forum. Thank you! Yes, I was the captain of my debate team in highschool, but that isn’t my point here. The drival these guys care and debate about is truly shocking.

    I’m still trying to figure out all the rules on this “handle” and “sock puppet” thing. It’s got a lot of nuances. It’s acceptable to be a “sock puppet” in some cases, like where you’re trying to rescue the world from “beast mode” ASMs, but you shouldn’t do it all the time. You can have different handles as long as they are only different by one or two letters. I think that’s the rules kj lives by. I don’t know if these are universal rules within the AP community.

    Btw, does that mean my two handles, Bob32 on bj21 and Bob21 on this site, is acceptable? Or is this a violation of the AP handle code of ethics? Is there a AP court that rules on this stuff? Or is it just kind of made up on the fly? From what I’ve seen this AP ethics thing is kind of like formshifters in Captain Marvel. It changes to suits ones needs. I’m a newbie learning so the more advanced APs will just have to be patient with me. Sorry I’m not a faster learner.

  5. #325
    Do any of you mother fuckers have any friends? Get off the damn computer and go outside and do something else. Most of you need to get a fucking life!

  6. #326
    The only reason this stupid issue has carried on is because it involves the most paranoid, anti-Singer dumbass in the gambling world--redietz. He's as anti me as any libtard is anti-Trump. Only problem for him is, he never prevails.

    Thus, the ad-nauseum.

  7. #327
    Amazingly, all of the dunces have come out in force in this thread to give a great big welcome to the latest member of the Confederacy of Dunces....Boob21. You fit right in with them, Boob.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #328
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Amazingly, all of the dunces have come out in force in this thread to give a great big welcome to the latest member of the Confederacy of Dunces....Boob21. You fit right in with them, Boob.
    Just when I thought that Alan was King of Tards along comes Boob. Might have to get a bigger bus.
    FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP

  9. #329
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    IIRC, the guys who played the double up games were just regular gamblers who stumbled upon the bug.

    Did they do any AP before the bug was found, afterwords, or other types of AP during the play?
    Was playing the bug advantageous to them?

    Again what else defines an AP? A secret code, decoder ring or handshake?

    If you are trying to tell me that discovering and playing a bug to your advantage does not make you an AP then you're a blowhard.

    Of course you did go from off strip craps dealer to Seven Stars player overnight, so I guess whatever you say must be true.
    Your buddy Rob S claims he is not an AP but he claims he can make money on VP whenever he wants, and so can others if they follow his system. Is that not advantageous to him? If what he is saying is true then that would also make him an AP, but he claims that's not the case and dumps on AP's. Whats up with that?

  10. #330
    I think what Rob is saying is that he doesn't follow the "rules" of AP play. For rxample he quits when ahead but APs say there is no need to quit because they are playing with an edge... even as they lose $8800 in a day and $29,000 in a week.

    APs find fault with his strategy to move down in denomination after a big win and to move up after a string of losses. APs condemn it but Rob's experience is that the strategy preserves wins and after a string of losses, it puts you in a position to catch a win. (I don't do this, by the way.)

    Yes, I think Rob's system has its own advantages that traditional APs won't see.

  11. #331
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Kewlj, you continue to say that I had a losing year. But you don't know that.

    As I said many times on this forum, why would anyone who posts using their real name report that they had a profit?

    And yes my father was a mob lawyer. Let me repeat that: my father was a mob lawyer. And he never cheated his clients. He was a good lawyer. And by the way, from time to time I run into some of his friends and sons of his friends.
    Why bring up if you are having winning or losing years in the first place? If you did happen to have a winning year then I see no need to just make up a lie like that in the first place. If someone asked you about winning or losing years you could have just said, NOYB. Do you often make up lies in order to mislead people when there is no need to? Whatever the case you were obviously trying to mislead someone.

    Perhaps you were trying to snow your own son since you were planning on fucking him out of future money, and then you did, so now you had to keep up the lie.
    Axel I once posted that I had a profit and YOU said you didn't believe me and you also said that if I put up the win/loss statements from the casinos you would consider them to be forgeries.
    Link please so I can read the entire conversation.

    I have a feeling you were claiming you never had a winning year long before I started posing on this site regularly. Whatever the case, I still have no clue why you would choose to lie one way or the other. claim nothing, or just claim the truth in the first place and you would not have claim or insinuate different things all the time.

    What I'm thinking is you originally started off telling people you never had a winning year because you haven't and you wanted to prove some point like you always do. But then, people started to use that information during arguments with you in order to debunk any advice or theories you might have. For example, "How would you know Alan, you don't know anything about gambling since you hit xyz lost it all back and you have never had a winning year, you are obviously a degenerate addicted gambler who has no clue what you are doing when it comes to gambling"

    Since many members started using that information in order to shut down anything you said about gambling, you decided to backtrack and make up some BS and make it look like you did have winning years but cant admit it because you need to hide that information from your Ex.

    I get it, you are a man who loves gambling, you prided yourself on knowing how to gamble and as being a knowledgeable gambler, but then come along AP's who make you realize your gambling knowledge is actually horrible and opposite of the math, logic and reality. As a man you can't admit that, so your reaction is not to learn from AP's, but in instead you would rather lash out at them and hitch your wagon to the anti AP crow.

    I think that is what had lead you to make up tall tails in an attempt to prove points and justify not accepting the Math, logic and reality of gambling. I.E. AP is not the answer because can go a gazillion to one and never win, and even a non AP can win for the entire life on -EV stuff using stop losses and other BS systems, Its all possible so AP is just crap"

  12. #332
    Actually Axel no one asked about yearly wins and losses until the "AP mafia" invaded this site. Until then we were a happy bunch who posted photos of big wins and we'd compliment each other.

    But then the APs showed up to say we'd lose it back or we were playing poor paytables or we were addicts. That's how we lost about a hundred regular posters here.

  13. #333
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think what Rob is saying is that he doesn't follow the "rules" of AP play. For rxample he quits when ahead but APs say there is no need to quit because they are playing with an edge... even as they lose $8800 in a day and $29,000 in a week.

    APs find fault with his strategy to move down in denomination after a big win and to move up after a string of losses. APs condemn it but Rob's experience is that the strategy preserves wins and after a string of losses, it puts you in a position to catch a win. (I don't do this, by the way.)

    Yes, I think Rob's system has its own advantages that traditional APs won't see.
    STOP LOSSES/WINS ARE NOTHING SPECIAL. Rob didn't invent this wheel, he just adapted it to VP for his con to sell books or whatever. His system only helps him avoid losing everything in a short period of time and when he wins it helps him not to give it all back that day or whatever. No matter what you will never be able to consistently win using his system. Given enough time everyone using his system will end up in the red. Some sooner rather than later, some in the middle, and some it will take longer if they get lucky.

  14. #334
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post

    But then the APs showed up to say we'd lose it back or we were playing poor paytables or we were addicts. .
    And the truth hurt. But instead of wising up, you joined the anti AP crowd. Hows that working out for your gambling bankroll?

    Keep blowing cash while searching for the AP antidote and a way to beat casinos with anti AP methods just to prove AP is a fabrication. The casino love it.

  15. #335
    Axel I'm not going to fight you. If that was your intention, I'm sorry. I thought you just wanted an explanation.

  16. #336
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think what Rob is saying is that he doesn't follow the "rules" of AP play. For rxample he quits when ahead but APs say there is no need to quit because they are playing with an edge... even as they lose $8800 in a day and $29,000 in a week.

    APs find fault with his strategy to move down in denomination after a big win and to move up after a string of losses. APs condemn it but Rob's experience is that the strategy preserves wins and after a string of losses, it puts you in a position to catch a win. (I don't do this, by the way.)

    Yes, I think Rob's system has its own advantages that traditional APs won't see.
    STOP LOSSES/WINS ARE NOTHING SPECIAL. Rob didn't invent this wheel, he just adapted it to VP for his con to sell books or whatever. His system only helps him avoid losing everything in a short period of time and when he wins it helps him not to give it all back that day or whatever. No matter what you will never be able to consistently win using his system. Given enough time everyone using his system will end up in the red. Some sooner rather than later, some in the middle, and some it will take longer if they get lucky.
    That's wishful thinking axel, and totally devoid of any logic. You're speaking from the position of pretending to know anything about the play strategy I use that's made me a consistent winner, and at the same time implying all AP's win.

    Just look at the nonsense you wrote, and I understand why you chose to exclude any details of your silly claims:

    First, I never included my play strategy in either of my books, so your initial assertion has no basis in truth. Big surprise....but who expected a well thought-thru, truthful initial response from you anyway.

    Next, when I win I go home until I choose to play again. I never "give it all back that day or whatever" because I stop playing--something AP's are unable to do by the way.

    Then--and this is your funniest lie--anyone who plays like I do will in fact win consistently, because I have. It is you people with your irresponsible "99.9% means you will lose consistently, and 100.1% means you will win consistently" uneducated rambling that proves you know nothing about how video poker actually works.

    Have you noticed a pattern? Even you uneducated "AP's" with no 401k's should get it. You have no idea if Alan wins or loses at VP so you choose to say he loses. Why? Because he also chooses not to wear the secret AP decoder ring. He also chooses to agree with SOME of what I do. And the best part is, both of us use mostly ap-tactics in our play because they are the simplest form of approaching the game. As do most players. It's only those ap's who choose to go on forums and pretend they have the patent on "intelligent vp play" who have talked themselves into believing that they're the few....the different....the oh-so-very-special among all players.

    Yet NONE of you play any different pay tables than the rest of us, because there aren't any different pay tables out there. All you people do is create +EV and winners out Of slot club and other side fluff that the rest of us look at as player loyalty extras, having zero to do with our machine/gaming results. AND WHEN FORUM AP'S ARE ALLOWED TO SELF-VALUE THEIR SLOT CLUB ETC. REWARDS, YOU WILL NEVER RUN ACROSS ONE WHO SAYS THEY LOSE.

    Wise up.

  17. #337
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I think what Rob is saying is that he doesn't follow the "rules" of AP play. For rxample he quits when ahead but APs say there is no need to quit because they are playing with an edge... even as they lose $8800 in a day and $29,000 in a week.

    APs find fault with his strategy to move down in denomination after a big win and to move up after a string of losses. APs condemn it but Rob's experience is that the strategy preserves wins and after a string of losses, it puts you in a position to catch a win. (I don't do this, by the way.)

    Yes, I think Rob's system has its own advantages that traditional APs won't see.
    STOP LOSSES/WINS ARE NOTHING SPECIAL. Rob didn't invent this wheel, he just adapted it to VP for his con to sell books or whatever. His system only helps him avoid losing everything in a short period of time and when he wins it helps him not to give it all back that day or whatever. No matter what you will never be able to consistently win using his system. Given enough time everyone using his system will end up in the red. Some sooner rather than later, some in the middle, and some it will take longer if they get lucky.

    AxelWolf, I assume for the AP "The ship will come in" at some point. Would you be willing to acknowledge it might be a mighty long wait? Are you sure everybody arrives safely? Is the journey toward the payoff always a calm sea?

  18. #338
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Axel I'm not going to fight you. If that was your intention, I'm sorry. I thought you just wanted an explanation.
    Alan, per your tagline, there's nothing wrong with quitting while ahead. The problem is you are not quitting. You are just pausing. Pause for one second, one minute, one hour, one day, one week, one year or whatever. But you are not changing the results by doing it. You are just changing when you play. The one good thing that comes our of it is you are playing less on a negative game so you lose less money. So forget all the Argentino pie in the sky voodoo bullshit.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  19. #339
    Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post
    Originally Posted by Keystone View Post
    Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post

    Please say it isn’t so Kj. How will I get through life if I get “nothing” from you. Lol. You have been my inspiration!

    As far as me being different, you’re probaly right. I’m an independent thinker, and don’t pick sides. I’ve had my quarrels with blackhole, but lately I’d have to say I agree with most of what he says, including ridiculing the mindless posts between you, Bobo and me. Even keystone has become one my favorite posters. He always has me laughing. Good stuff there.

    Btw, you need to check out some my early posts on BJTF. I had some good debates with several APs, including Don S, on different counts, and the casino experience in general. Freightman even commented he’d never seen someone get so many helpfuls as a newbie poster. Obviously, people turned on me when I defended caisnos against some of the stupid comments they were making. Most APs don’t know that the casinos main objective is not to see how much an APs can take from them. That’s a joke. Btw, most APs don’t have much of a sense of humor either. They can’t spot sacrasim.

    As far as our disagreements. They have only been over two topics: 1) mindplay and 2) beast mode. Why is it so hard for you to accept that someone can think different than you on some topic?

    Yes, I’m a part time recreational AP, but I still get things from the casino prespective. And I know this is rare for an AP. When I see these young counters come through my local casinos, they do kind of piss me off. I’ve seen more and more of them lately.

    They are the true definition of a parasite. They come in to “take” without contributing anything. For example, recently one came though and won $8,000 at bj before they were finally backed off, probably 86d. He played with 3 different dealers and didn’t tip any of them even one dollar. How do I know, because I was there and they told me. It shocked them that someone could be that callous, winning that much money and not leave even a one dollar tip to a waitress or dealer. I expect this guy later bragged to all his AP friends how he took this casino for so much money while leaving no tip.

    So no, I don’t have much respect for this type of AP? I will always defend the casino here. All APs are not the same though. I’ve met some very good compassionate ones, and shared phone numbers with them. I actually have an AP friend from Vegas who comes to my area about once every two months.

    So kJ, back to your threat about no longer responding to my posts, except in a negative way. That’s your call. But I won’t be doing the the same with you. That’s not how I’m wired. When I see you say something that makes sense, I’ll agree with you, and probably comment favorably. And when I see you say something that makes no sense, like beast mode, I’ll probably ridicule you. Btw, I was not the only AP that did this when you went on your beast mode rant.

    I do hope that someday you can grow up and accept that people are different and everybody doesn’t think the same way. I wish you - and BOBO- the best. See I have no ill will towards BOBO, even though he went on BJTF just to attack me. I forgive my attackers. I just want us to all get along as one big happy family! Lol . Btw, I don’t really believe that. If that happened, these forums wouldn’t be any fun.
    Why thank you Bob, nice of you to say....I am trying very hard to keep quiet with the insults, but when you have an illiterate miserable puke like BlackPole, and a total fucking boob like Moses, who was obviously dropped on his head multiple times as a young, ignorant toddler,providing endless material, it just sort of flows .....Maybe you can answer a question for me...who is this Freighter character that I`ve read about a few times?.....I`m getting sort of lost trying to keep up and may need a scorecard....There`s Tater...Freighter...Masturbator.....Thanks in advance for any light you can shed....It`s very confusing trying to keep track of alternative lifestyle Moses and his gang of butt pirates
    About Frieghtman, he was the defacto leader on BJTF. Think of him as the hall bully in junior high school. BJTF is kind of like Lords of the Fly, with a bunch of juveniles running the insane asylum. It has a certain pecking order, and unwritten rules a newbie is not supposed to violate. Most - not all - of the regulars all think they are smartest people who ever lived. They’re APs after all. Lol. At least, that’s what they tell each other. If you don’t know your place in the pecking order, the whole gang comes down on you hard. When I first registered and asked questions on BJTF, they treated me well and I got a lot of “helpfuls”. Don’t know why? I must have said things that were different for an AP but not over the line.

    Anyway, back to Freightman. He thinks he’s the funniest person alive with his insults, but his jokes are about two levels below Moses. Btw, I truelly find Moses jokes pretty funny. Moses was always my favorite poster over BJTF, until he got the boot and sent to zenzone. I found out about Zenzone through BJTF. Some members were talking to Moses through BTJF and letting people know he was over there, until Norm put a stop to it. I’m glad Dan doesn’t do that here.

    Back to Freightman: I crossed some line with that gang (I think I talked about tipping or said something positive about casinos) and Freightman took it upon himself to take me on. Btw, if you ever want to drive an AP crazy just talk about tipping in a casino. It’s like scarching a chalk board. It really sets them off. Look at what kj did when I mentioned tipping. He spent about 5 paragraphs trying to justify being cheap and not tipping.

    When Freightman took me on, it backfired on him, and he became so frazzled he had to get counseling. I’m not kidding. He lost it and even other forum members told him to put me on ignore, because he was unable to argue with me on my level. I was really getting worried about him for a while. You see I don’t take these forums too seriously so people like Freightman - and there were quite a few others - attacking me constantly didn’t have any affect on me. This drives APs crazy.

    As a side story, Freightman was Bosox’s hero. About every other post Bosox made he’d praise Freightman. Bosox was like the side kick to the hall bully. You know the guy from junior highschool. I don’t know if you noticed but Bosox is a follower. He needs someone to look up too. That’s why Bosox appears lost now. Freightman has retired from posting because he got his feelings hurt when he made some post and someone (it wasn’t me) put him in his place and this post got like 15 Helpfuls. On BJTF, members can rate posts by clicking helpful or unhelpful.. This really hurt Freightman’s feelings and he retired a short time latter. What I’ve noticed is APs as a group are very sensitive people. They get their feelings hurt easily.

    Anyway, that’s the short version. That’s why I’m cutting Bobo some slack. He lost his idol over at BJTF so he’s lost now. You can tell he’s aimless going around looking for someone to attack since he has no direction. Hopefully, Freightman will come out of retirement soon to give Bosox some direction.
    Thanks for the explanation Bob...another question- why does Moronses have the line "Hammer da Butt" written under his name?....Is that some sort of special mating call between him and the Tater?.....sounds gay, no?

  20. #340
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Axel I'm not going to fight you. If that was your intention, I'm sorry. I thought you just wanted an explanation.
    Alan, per your tagline, there's nothing wrong with quitting while ahead. The problem is you are not quitting. You are just pausing. Pause for one second, one minute, one hour, one day, one week, one year or whatever. But you are not changing the results by doing it. You are just changing when you play. The one good thing that comes our of it is you are playing less on a negative game so you lose less money. So forget all the Argentino pie in the sky voodoo bullshit.

    Well said Mickeycrimm. I do not know why it is so hard to comprehend?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. prosecuted for playing abandoned slot credits
    By kewlJ in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-22-2017, 05:46 PM
  2. 40 cent Keno bet wins over $100,000
    By Vegas Vic in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2011, 08:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •