Originally Posted by
Alan Mendelson
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
One of us certainly is a FUCKING LIAR, son of a shyster!
I didn't say you challenged Redietz. I clearly said Singer did. If you hadn't taken the short bus all those years and actually learned how to read, you would have read that.
But you agreed to receive and review the package. And before you deny that, you providing your address and telling Redietz to mail it to you was you agreeing to that.
And then you changed your story about when you would get to the office to view the "package" 7 times, from twice a week, to once a week, to every other week, to once a month, to once a quarter (every 3 months), to you didn't have keys to your own office, to you were retiring and the office was closed. Tell me you didn't, because I will post those posts from you, you fucking liar!
You can do all the CAPS you want. Those posts are still right here on this site.
That's right Mr #1 Hater. All of those posts are on this site and every one of them says I never doubted redietz.
Now if redietz would confirm this it will save me the trouble of copying and pasting those posts again as well as my private messages to redietz telling him that sending the package was not necessary.
But do we have to go thru this bullshit one more time Mr #1 Hater? If we do, I'm prepared. And I'm ready.
What do you say redietz?
What do you say Mr #1 Hater?
It's in both of your hands now.
I already answered all of this in a post above. You decided you didn't want the material after I responded "yay!" I said you didn't have to publicly vouch for me, but if my plane went down, I expected you to confirm that I was the R.E.Dietz in the package. I expected you to pick up the package and look at it. The reason you not doing so annoyed me was that I understood you might not know what you were looking at, journalistic experience aside, so I hand wrote a brief note page for each section that gave a vanilla summary of what each section was about. I had done that prior to you deciding that you didn't want the stuff, so I felt you had an obligation to at least pick it up and take a look since I put in the work.
Now, since you're an accomplished journalist -- and I'm serious, not snarky -- what say you regarding:
1) Why the hell you wouldn't bother to look at it?
2) Why were you so averse to proving Singer wrong?
I was living in Orange at the time -- 3512 Meadowridge to be precise -- so your office and home were directly across LA. I gave you the address and told you to drop in anytime to verify that I was me and say hello. I was there three years. You never stopped by.
So I ask you again, why were you so averse to conclusively demonstrating (not an opinion, mind you, but proof) that Singer was wrong and talking out of his ass, as he usually does? What did you owe this guy that overrode any sense of journalistic integrity?